Spectral Representation
The Kallen-Lehmann representation: exact structure of the interacting propagator
4.12 Motivation: The Exact Propagator
In the free theory, the 2-point function is the Feynman propagator with a single pole at $p^2 = m^2$. In the interacting theory, the exact 2-point function receives corrections from all loop diagrams. What is the most general structure this exact propagator can have?
The Kallen-Lehmann spectral representation answers this question using only Lorentz invariance, unitarity (completeness of states), and positivity of the Hilbert space norm. It is an exact, non-perturbative result.
π‘Why Is This Important?
The spectral representation tells us the exact propagator is a "weighted sum" of free propagators with different masses. The weight function (spectral density) encodes all the information about the particle spectrum of the theory β bound states, resonances, and multi-particle continua. It is one of the few exact results in interacting QFT.
4.13 Derivation of the Kallen-Lehmann Representation
Consider the exact 2-point function in the interacting theory:
where $|\Omega\rangle$ is the exact vacuum of the interacting theory. Insert a complete set of intermediate states. By Lorentz invariance, these states can be labelled by total 4-momentum $p^\mu$ and invariant mass squared $\mu^2 = p^2$:
where $|\lambda,\mathbf{p}\rangle$ represents a state with quantum numbers $\lambda$ boosted to momentum $\mathbf{p}$. Consider $t_x > t_y$ (the other case is analogous). Insert the completeness relation:
(The vacuum term vanishes since $\langle\Omega|\phi|\Omega\rangle = 0$ by the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ symmetry $\phi\to-\phi$.) Using translation invariance $\phi(x) = e^{iP\cdot x}\phi(0)e^{-iP\cdot x}$:
Define the spectral density (or spectral function):
where $m_\lambda^2$ is the invariant mass squared of state $|\lambda\rangle$. After combining both time orderings and performing the $d^3p$ integral:
where $D_F(x-y;\mu^2)$ is the free Feynman propagator with mass $\mu$. This is the Kallen-Lehmann spectral representation in position space.
4.14 Momentum-Space Form and the Exact Propagator
Fourier transforming to momentum space:
The spectral density $\rho(\mu^2)$ has a specific structure dictated by the particle content:
This gives the exact propagator the structure:
The first term is an isolated pole at $p^2 = m^2$ corresponding to the single-particle state with residue $Z$. The second term is a branch cut starting at $p^2 = 4m^2$ (the two-particle threshold) from the continuum of multi-particle states.
π‘Reading the Spectral Density
The spectral density is like a "mass spectrum" of the theory:
- Delta function at $m^2$: The stable single-particle state (pole in propagator)
- Continuum above $4m^2$: Two-particle states and beyond (branch cut)
- Additional delta functions: Would indicate bound states below the continuum threshold
- Peaks in the continuum: Resonances (unstable particles)
4.15 Connection to Unitarity
The spectral density satisfies a crucial sum rule from the equal-time commutation relation $[\phi(x),\pi(y)]_{t_x=t_y} = i\delta^3(\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{y})$:
Since $\rho(\mu^2) \geq 0$ (it is a sum of squared matrix elements), the single-particle contribution gives:
Since the continuum contribution is strictly positive in an interacting theory:
This is a non-perturbative constraint on the wavefunction renormalization. In the free theory, $\rho_{\text{cont}} = 0$ and $Z = 1$. Interactions always reduce $Z$ below 1 because the field operator creates multi-particle states as well as the single particle.
The optical theorem relates the imaginary part of the propagator to the spectral density:
This connects the spectral representation directly to unitarity: the imaginary part of scattering amplitudes is related to the total rate of producing intermediate states.
4.16 Worked Example: One-Loop Self-Energy
Let us verify the spectral structure using the one-loop self-energy in $\phi^4$ theory. The exact propagator is related to the self-energy $\Sigma(p^2)$ by Dyson resummation:
The physical mass $m$ is defined by the pole condition:
Near the pole, expand $\Sigma(p^2) \approx \Sigma(m^2) + (p^2-m^2)\Sigma'(m^2) + \cdots$:
where the wavefunction renormalization is:
At one loop in $\phi^4$, $\Sigma'(m^2) \sim \lambda^2/(4\pi)^2$ from the bubble diagram (the tadpole is momentum-independent so $\Sigma'_{\text{tadpole}} = 0$). Thus $Z = 1 - O(\lambda^2) < 1$, consistent with the non-perturbative bound. The imaginary part of $\Sigma(p^2)$ is nonzero for $p^2 > 4m^2$, confirming the onset of the two-particle continuum at the expected threshold.
π‘The Physical Mass vs the Bare Mass
The pole of the exact propagator defines the physical mass $m$, which differs from the bare mass $m_0$ in the Lagrangian. The residue $Z$ at this pole is the probability that the field creates a single-particle state rather than a multi-particle cloud. Renormalization conditions fix $m$ and $Z$ to their physical values.
Key Concepts β Spectral Representation
- Kallen-Lehmann: exact propagator = integral of free propagators weighted by $\rho(\mu^2)$
- Spectral density $\rho(\mu^2) \geq 0$ encodes the full particle spectrum
- Isolated pole at $p^2 = m^2$ with residue $Z$ = stable single particle
- Branch cut at $p^2 \geq 4m^2$ = multi-particle continuum
- Sum rule: $Z + \int\rho_{\text{cont}} = 1$ implies $0 < Z < 1$ in interacting theory
- Optical theorem: $\text{Im}\,G^{(2)} \propto \rho$, connecting to unitarity
- Physical mass defined by pole of exact propagator, $Z$ by its residue
- Non-perturbative result: valid to all orders and beyond perturbation theory