Part IV, Chapter 4 | Page 3 of 4

Bhabha Scattering & Pair Production

Interference between channels and crossing symmetry connecting different processes

4.13 Bhabha Scattering: e⁺e⁻ → e⁺e⁻

When the final-state particles are the same species as the initial state, a new diagram appears. Bhabha scattering ($e^+e^- \to e^+e^-$) has two tree-level diagrams:

s-channel (annihilation)

The $e^+e^-$ annihilates into a virtual photon, which creates a new $e^+e^-$ pair. Identical to the e⁺e⁻ → μ⁺μ⁻ diagram but with electrons in the final state.

$$\mathcal{M}_s = \frac{-e^2}{s}[\bar{v}_2\gamma^\mu u_1][\bar{u}_3\gamma_\mu v_4]$$

t-channel (scattering)

The electron and positron exchange a virtual photon without annihilating. This diagram exists because the final state is identical to the initial state.

$$\mathcal{M}_t = \frac{-e^2}{t}[\bar{u}_3\gamma^\mu u_1][\bar{v}_2\gamma_\mu v_4]$$

The total amplitude is the sum (with a crucial relative minus sign from fermion statistics):

$$\boxed{\mathcal{M}_{\text{Bhabha}} = \mathcal{M}_s - \mathcal{M}_t}$$

💡Why the Relative Minus Sign?

The relative minus sign between the s and t channel amplitudes arises from Fermi statistics. In the t-channel diagram, the fermion lines are connected differently from the s-channel, effectively exchanging two identical fermion operators. By the spin-statistics theorem, this exchange produces a factor of $(-1)$.

4.14 The Bhabha Cross Section

Squaring the amplitude gives three distinct contributions:

$$\overline{|\mathcal{M}|^2} = \overline{|\mathcal{M}_s|^2} + \overline{|\mathcal{M}_t|^2} - 2\,\text{Re}\,\overline{\mathcal{M}_s \mathcal{M}_t^*}$$

The s-channel squared term is identical to e⁺e⁻ → μ⁺μ⁻ (we already computed it):

$$\overline{|\mathcal{M}_s|^2} = \frac{2e^4}{s^2}(t^2 + u^2)$$

The t-channel squared term: The trace calculation proceeds identically but with$s \leftrightarrow t$. The photon propagator has $1/t^2$ and the kinematics rearrange to give:

$$\overline{|\mathcal{M}_t|^2} = \frac{2e^4}{t^2}(s^2 + u^2)$$

The interference term: This is the genuinely new calculation. Cross terms between the s and t channels produce a single trace over eight gamma matrices (rather than a product of two four-gamma traces). Using the trace identity for eight gamma matrices:

$$2\,\text{Re}\,\overline{\mathcal{M}_s \mathcal{M}_t^*} = \frac{2e^4}{st}\cdot 2u^2$$

Combining all three pieces (in the massless limit):

$$\boxed{\overline{|\mathcal{M}_{\text{Bhabha}}|^2} = 2e^4\left[\frac{t^2+u^2}{s^2} + \frac{s^2+u^2}{t^2} - \frac{2u^2}{st}\right]}$$

Converting to the CM scattering angle $\theta$ using $t = -(s/2)(1-\cos\theta)$ and $u = -(s/2)(1+\cos\theta)$:

$$\frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega}\bigg|_{\text{Bhabha}} = \frac{\alpha^2}{2s}\left[\frac{1+\cos^4(\theta/2)}{\sin^4(\theta/2)} - \frac{2\cos^4(\theta/2)}{\sin^2(\theta/2)} + \frac{1+\cos^2\theta}{2}\right]$$

4.15 Interference Effects in Bhabha Scattering

The angular distribution of Bhabha scattering is dramatically different from $e^+e^- \to \mu^+\mu^-$due to the t-channel contribution:

  • 1.Forward peak: The t-channel term has $1/t^2 \sim 1/\sin^4(\theta/2)$, producing a strong forward peak ($\theta \to 0$). This is Coulomb-like scattering.
  • 2.Backward enhancement: The s-channel term contributes a $(1+\cos^2\theta)$pattern, enhancing the backward direction.
  • 3.Destructive interference: The cross term is negative (note the minus sign), reducing the cross section at intermediate angles.

💡Bhabha Scattering at Colliders

Bhabha scattering is the most important "calibration process" at e⁺e⁻ colliders. Its large, precisely calculable cross section at small angles (dominated by the t-channel) is used to measure the luminosity of the collider. The LEP experiment at CERN measured Bhabha scattering to 0.05% precision — requiring QED calculations to two-loop order.

4.16 Pair Production from Crossing Symmetry

The process $\gamma\gamma \to e^+e^-$ is related to Compton scattering by crossing symmetry. The idea is that an incoming particle with momentum $p$ is equivalent to an outgoing antiparticle with momentum $-p$.

Starting from the Compton amplitude $\gamma(k) + e^-(p) \to \gamma(k') + e^-(p')$, we cross:

$$k \to k_1, \quad -p' \to k_2, \quad -k' \to p_-, \quad p \to -p_+$$

to obtain $\gamma(k_1) + \gamma(k_2) \to e^-(p_-) + e^+(p_+)$. The Compton Mandelstam variables transform as:

$$s_{\text{Compton}} \to t_{\text{pair}}, \qquad u_{\text{Compton}} \to u_{\text{pair}}, \qquad t_{\text{Compton}} \to s_{\text{pair}}$$

Applying this crossing to the Compton result, the pair production cross section in the CM frame (where $|\vec{k}_1| = |\vec{k}_2| = \omega$ and $\sqrt{s} = 2\omega$) is:

$$\boxed{\frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega}\bigg|_{\gamma\gamma\to e^+e^-} = \frac{\alpha^2}{2s}\frac{|\vec{p}|}{|\vec{k}|}\left[\frac{t-m^2}{u-m^2} + \frac{u-m^2}{t-m^2} + 4\left(\frac{m^2}{t-m^2} + \frac{m^2}{u-m^2}\right) - 4\left(\frac{m^2}{t-m^2} + \frac{m^2}{u-m^2}\right)^2\right]}$$

where $|\vec{p}| = \sqrt{\omega^2 - m^2}$ is the magnitude of the final-state electron 3-momentum. Note the threshold condition: pair production requires $\sqrt{s} \geq 2m$, i.e., $\omega \geq m$.

4.17 Properties of Pair Production

Near threshold ($\omega \to m$, or $\beta = |\vec{p}|/\omega \to 0$): the phase space factor $|\vec{p}|/|\vec{k}| = \beta$ suppresses the cross section, and:

$$\sigma_{\text{threshold}} \approx \frac{\pi\alpha^2}{m^2}\beta \qquad (\beta \to 0)$$

High-energy limit ($s \gg m^2$, all masses negligible):

$$\sigma_{\text{high-E}} \approx \frac{4\pi\alpha^2}{s}\left[\ln\frac{s}{m^2} - 1\right] \qquad (s \gg m^2)$$

The logarithmic enhancement arises from the t and u channel propagators going nearly on-shell when the outgoing electron or positron is collinear with an incoming photon.

💡Crossing Symmetry as a Computational Tool

Crossing symmetry is enormously powerful: once you compute one process, you immediately get several related processes for free. Compton scattering ($e\gamma \to e\gamma$), pair production ($\gamma\gamma \to e^+e^-$), and pair annihilation ($e^+e^- \to \gamma\gamma$) are all the same amplitude evaluated in different kinematic regions. The amplitudes are analytic functions of the Mandelstam variables, continued between the physical regions of each process.

4.18 Pair Annihilation: e⁺e⁻ → γγ

The reverse process, $e^+e^- \to \gamma\gamma$, is obtained from pair production by time reversal (or equivalently, by another crossing). By detailed balance, at the same CM energy:

$$\overline{|\mathcal{M}(e^+e^- \to \gamma\gamma)|^2} = \overline{|\mathcal{M}(\gamma\gamma \to e^+e^-)|^2}$$

but the cross sections differ by the ratio of phase space factors and flux. In the non-relativistic limit ($v \to 0$), the annihilation cross section becomes:

$$\boxed{\sigma(e^+e^- \to \gamma\gamma) \approx \frac{\pi\alpha^2}{m^2}\frac{1}{v} \qquad (v \to 0)}$$

The $1/v$ enhancement at low velocity is characteristic of s-wave annihilation. Multiplying by the relative velocity gives the annihilation rate$\sigma v \to \pi\alpha^2/m^2$, which is finite and well-behaved.

Key Concepts (Page 3)

  • • Bhabha scattering has both s-channel (annihilation) and t-channel (exchange) diagrams with a relative minus sign
  • • The interference term involves a single trace over 8 gamma matrices
  • • The t-channel produces a strong forward peak ($\sim 1/\sin^4(\theta/2)$), used for luminosity measurement
  • • Crossing symmetry relates Compton, pair production, and pair annihilation amplitudes
  • • Pair production threshold: $\sqrt{s} \geq 2m_e$, with σ ∼ β near threshold
  • • Pair annihilation: σ ∼ πα²/(m²v) at low velocity (1/v enhancement)
← Compton Scattering
Page 3 of 4
Chapter 4: Elementary QED Processes I
Worked Examples →