Bhabha Scattering & Pair Production
Interference between channels and crossing symmetry connecting different processes
4.13 Bhabha Scattering: e⁺e⁻ → e⁺e⁻
When the final-state particles are the same species as the initial state, a new diagram appears. Bhabha scattering ($e^+e^- \to e^+e^-$) has two tree-level diagrams:
s-channel (annihilation)
The $e^+e^-$ annihilates into a virtual photon, which creates a new $e^+e^-$ pair. Identical to the e⁺e⁻ → μ⁺μ⁻ diagram but with electrons in the final state.
t-channel (scattering)
The electron and positron exchange a virtual photon without annihilating. This diagram exists because the final state is identical to the initial state.
The total amplitude is the sum (with a crucial relative minus sign from fermion statistics):
💡Why the Relative Minus Sign?
The relative minus sign between the s and t channel amplitudes arises from Fermi statistics. In the t-channel diagram, the fermion lines are connected differently from the s-channel, effectively exchanging two identical fermion operators. By the spin-statistics theorem, this exchange produces a factor of $(-1)$.
4.14 The Bhabha Cross Section
Squaring the amplitude gives three distinct contributions:
The s-channel squared term is identical to e⁺e⁻ → μ⁺μ⁻ (we already computed it):
The t-channel squared term: The trace calculation proceeds identically but with$s \leftrightarrow t$. The photon propagator has $1/t^2$ and the kinematics rearrange to give:
The interference term: This is the genuinely new calculation. Cross terms between the s and t channels produce a single trace over eight gamma matrices (rather than a product of two four-gamma traces). Using the trace identity for eight gamma matrices:
Combining all three pieces (in the massless limit):
Converting to the CM scattering angle $\theta$ using $t = -(s/2)(1-\cos\theta)$ and $u = -(s/2)(1+\cos\theta)$:
4.15 Interference Effects in Bhabha Scattering
The angular distribution of Bhabha scattering is dramatically different from $e^+e^- \to \mu^+\mu^-$due to the t-channel contribution:
- 1.Forward peak: The t-channel term has $1/t^2 \sim 1/\sin^4(\theta/2)$, producing a strong forward peak ($\theta \to 0$). This is Coulomb-like scattering.
- 2.Backward enhancement: The s-channel term contributes a $(1+\cos^2\theta)$pattern, enhancing the backward direction.
- 3.Destructive interference: The cross term is negative (note the minus sign), reducing the cross section at intermediate angles.
💡Bhabha Scattering at Colliders
Bhabha scattering is the most important "calibration process" at e⁺e⁻ colliders. Its large, precisely calculable cross section at small angles (dominated by the t-channel) is used to measure the luminosity of the collider. The LEP experiment at CERN measured Bhabha scattering to 0.05% precision — requiring QED calculations to two-loop order.
4.16 Pair Production from Crossing Symmetry
The process $\gamma\gamma \to e^+e^-$ is related to Compton scattering by crossing symmetry. The idea is that an incoming particle with momentum $p$ is equivalent to an outgoing antiparticle with momentum $-p$.
Starting from the Compton amplitude $\gamma(k) + e^-(p) \to \gamma(k') + e^-(p')$, we cross:
to obtain $\gamma(k_1) + \gamma(k_2) \to e^-(p_-) + e^+(p_+)$. The Compton Mandelstam variables transform as:
Applying this crossing to the Compton result, the pair production cross section in the CM frame (where $|\vec{k}_1| = |\vec{k}_2| = \omega$ and $\sqrt{s} = 2\omega$) is:
where $|\vec{p}| = \sqrt{\omega^2 - m^2}$ is the magnitude of the final-state electron 3-momentum. Note the threshold condition: pair production requires $\sqrt{s} \geq 2m$, i.e., $\omega \geq m$.
4.17 Properties of Pair Production
Near threshold ($\omega \to m$, or $\beta = |\vec{p}|/\omega \to 0$): the phase space factor $|\vec{p}|/|\vec{k}| = \beta$ suppresses the cross section, and:
High-energy limit ($s \gg m^2$, all masses negligible):
The logarithmic enhancement arises from the t and u channel propagators going nearly on-shell when the outgoing electron or positron is collinear with an incoming photon.
💡Crossing Symmetry as a Computational Tool
Crossing symmetry is enormously powerful: once you compute one process, you immediately get several related processes for free. Compton scattering ($e\gamma \to e\gamma$), pair production ($\gamma\gamma \to e^+e^-$), and pair annihilation ($e^+e^- \to \gamma\gamma$) are all the same amplitude evaluated in different kinematic regions. The amplitudes are analytic functions of the Mandelstam variables, continued between the physical regions of each process.
4.18 Pair Annihilation: e⁺e⁻ → γγ
The reverse process, $e^+e^- \to \gamma\gamma$, is obtained from pair production by time reversal (or equivalently, by another crossing). By detailed balance, at the same CM energy:
but the cross sections differ by the ratio of phase space factors and flux. In the non-relativistic limit ($v \to 0$), the annihilation cross section becomes:
The $1/v$ enhancement at low velocity is characteristic of s-wave annihilation. Multiplying by the relative velocity gives the annihilation rate$\sigma v \to \pi\alpha^2/m^2$, which is finite and well-behaved.
Key Concepts (Page 3)
- • Bhabha scattering has both s-channel (annihilation) and t-channel (exchange) diagrams with a relative minus sign
- • The interference term involves a single trace over 8 gamma matrices
- • The t-channel produces a strong forward peak ($\sim 1/\sin^4(\theta/2)$), used for luminosity measurement
- • Crossing symmetry relates Compton, pair production, and pair annihilation amplitudes
- • Pair production threshold: $\sqrt{s} \geq 2m_e$, with σ ∼ β near threshold
- • Pair annihilation: σ ∼ πα²/(m²v) at low velocity (1/v enhancement)