Bhabha Scattering & Pair Production
Interference between channels and crossing symmetry connecting different processes
4.13 Bhabha Scattering: eβΊeβ» β eβΊeβ»
When the final-state particles are the same species as the initial state, a new diagram appears. Bhabha scattering ($e^+e^- \to e^+e^-$) has two tree-level diagrams:
s-channel (annihilation)
The $e^+e^-$ annihilates into a virtual photon, which creates a new $e^+e^-$ pair. Identical to the eβΊeβ» β ΞΌβΊΞΌβ» diagram but with electrons in the final state.
t-channel (scattering)
The electron and positron exchange a virtual photon without annihilating. This diagram exists because the final state is identical to the initial state.
The total amplitude is the sum (with a crucial relative minus sign from fermion statistics):
π‘Why the Relative Minus Sign?
The relative minus sign between the s and t channel amplitudes arises from Fermi statistics. In the t-channel diagram, the fermion lines are connected differently from the s-channel, effectively exchanging two identical fermion operators. By the spin-statistics theorem, this exchange produces a factor of $(-1)$.
4.14 The Bhabha Cross Section
Squaring the amplitude gives three distinct contributions:
The s-channel squared term is identical to eβΊeβ» β ΞΌβΊΞΌβ» (we already computed it):
The t-channel squared term: The trace calculation proceeds identically but with$s \leftrightarrow t$. The photon propagator has $1/t^2$ and the kinematics rearrange to give:
The interference term: This is the genuinely new calculation. Cross terms between the s and t channels produce a single trace over eight gamma matrices (rather than a product of two four-gamma traces). Using the trace identity for eight gamma matrices:
Combining all three pieces (in the massless limit):
Converting to the CM scattering angle $\theta$ using $t = -(s/2)(1-\cos\theta)$ and $u = -(s/2)(1+\cos\theta)$:
4.15 Interference Effects in Bhabha Scattering
The angular distribution of Bhabha scattering is dramatically different from $e^+e^- \to \mu^+\mu^-$due to the t-channel contribution:
- 1.Forward peak: The t-channel term has $1/t^2 \sim 1/\sin^4(\theta/2)$, producing a strong forward peak ($\theta \to 0$). This is Coulomb-like scattering.
- 2.Backward enhancement: The s-channel term contributes a $(1+\cos^2\theta)$pattern, enhancing the backward direction.
- 3.Destructive interference: The cross term is negative (note the minus sign), reducing the cross section at intermediate angles.
π‘Bhabha Scattering at Colliders
Bhabha scattering is the most important "calibration process" at eβΊeβ» colliders. Its large, precisely calculable cross section at small angles (dominated by the t-channel) is used to measure the luminosity of the collider. The LEP experiment at CERN measured Bhabha scattering to 0.05% precision β requiring QED calculations to two-loop order.
4.16 Pair Production from Crossing Symmetry
The process $\gamma\gamma \to e^+e^-$ is related to Compton scattering by crossing symmetry. The idea is that an incoming particle with momentum $p$ is equivalent to an outgoing antiparticle with momentum $-p$.
Starting from the Compton amplitude $\gamma(k) + e^-(p) \to \gamma(k') + e^-(p')$, we cross:
to obtain $\gamma(k_1) + \gamma(k_2) \to e^-(p_-) + e^+(p_+)$. The Compton Mandelstam variables transform as:
Applying this crossing to the Compton result, the pair production cross section in the CM frame (where $|\vec{k}_1| = |\vec{k}_2| = \omega$ and $\sqrt{s} = 2\omega$) is:
where $|\vec{p}| = \sqrt{\omega^2 - m^2}$ is the magnitude of the final-state electron 3-momentum. Note the threshold condition: pair production requires $\sqrt{s} \geq 2m$, i.e., $\omega \geq m$.
4.17 Properties of Pair Production
Near threshold ($\omega \to m$, or $\beta = |\vec{p}|/\omega \to 0$): the phase space factor $|\vec{p}|/|\vec{k}| = \beta$ suppresses the cross section, and:
High-energy limit ($s \gg m^2$, all masses negligible):
The logarithmic enhancement arises from the t and u channel propagators going nearly on-shell when the outgoing electron or positron is collinear with an incoming photon.
π‘Crossing Symmetry as a Computational Tool
Crossing symmetry is enormously powerful: once you compute one process, you immediately get several related processes for free. Compton scattering ($e\gamma \to e\gamma$), pair production ($\gamma\gamma \to e^+e^-$), and pair annihilation ($e^+e^- \to \gamma\gamma$) are all the same amplitude evaluated in different kinematic regions. The amplitudes are analytic functions of the Mandelstam variables, continued between the physical regions of each process.
4.18 Pair Annihilation: eβΊeβ» β Ξ³Ξ³
The reverse process, $e^+e^- \to \gamma\gamma$, is obtained from pair production by time reversal (or equivalently, by another crossing). By detailed balance, at the same CM energy:
but the cross sections differ by the ratio of phase space factors and flux. In the non-relativistic limit ($v \to 0$), the annihilation cross section becomes:
The $1/v$ enhancement at low velocity is characteristic of s-wave annihilation. Multiplying by the relative velocity gives the annihilation rate$\sigma v \to \pi\alpha^2/m^2$, which is finite and well-behaved.
Key Concepts (Page 3)
- β’ Bhabha scattering has both s-channel (annihilation) and t-channel (exchange) diagrams with a relative minus sign
- β’ The interference term involves a single trace over 8 gamma matrices
- β’ The t-channel produces a strong forward peak ($\sim 1/\sin^4(\theta/2)$), used for luminosity measurement
- β’ Crossing symmetry relates Compton, pair production, and pair annihilation amplitudes
- β’ Pair production threshold: $\sqrt{s} \geq 2m_e$, with Ο βΌ Ξ² near threshold
- β’ Pair annihilation: Ο βΌ ΟΞ±Β²/(mΒ²v) at low velocity (1/v enhancement)