← The Citric Acid Cycle/Electron Transport & ATP Synthesis

18. Electron Transport & ATP Synthesis

Reading time: ~50 minutes | Key topics: Electron transport chain complexes, redox potentials, chemiosmotic theory, ATP synthase rotary mechanism, P/O ratios, total ATP yield

Overview of Oxidative Phosphorylation

Oxidative phosphorylation is the final stage of aerobic respiration and the process by which the vast majority of cellular ATP is produced. It takes place at the inner mitochondrial membrane, which is folded into cristae to maximize surface area. The process couples two phenomena: (1) the transfer of electrons from NADH and $\text{FADH}_2$ through a series of membrane-bound protein complexes to molecular oxygen, and (2) the use of the resulting proton gradient to drive ATP synthesis.

The electrons flow through four major complexes (I–IV) in order of increasing reduction potential, ultimately reducing $\text{O}_2$ to $\text{H}_2\text{O}$. The free energy released during electron transfer is used to pump protons ($\text{H}^+$) from the matrix to the intermembrane space, establishing an electrochemical gradient called the proton-motive force. ATP synthase (Complex V) then harnesses the flow of protons back down this gradient to catalyze the phosphorylation of ADP to ATP.

The overall reaction for electron transfer from NADH to $\text{O}_2$ is:

$$\text{NADH} + \text{H}^+ + \tfrac{1}{2}\text{O}_2 \;\longrightarrow\; \text{NAD}^+ + \text{H}_2\text{O} \qquad \Delta G^{\circ\prime} = -218.5\;\text{kJ/mol}$$

This enormous free energy release ($-218.5$ kJ/mol) is captured in stages across the three proton-pumping complexes, rather than being released all at once. This stepwise energy extraction is the hallmark of biological elegance in energy transduction.

Electron Transport Chain Complexes

The electron transport chain (ETC) consists of four large multisubunit complexes (I–IV) embedded in the inner mitochondrial membrane, plus two mobile electron carriers: ubiquinone (coenzyme Q, CoQ) and cytochrome c. Each complex contains multiple redox-active prosthetic groups including flavins, iron-sulfur clusters, hemes, and copper centers.

Complex I: NADH-Ubiquinone Oxidoreductase

The largest complex of the ETC (~45 subunits in mammals, ~1 MDa). NADH donates two electrons to the flavin mononucleotide (FMN) prosthetic group. Electrons then pass through a chain of 8–9 iron-sulfur (Fe-S) clusters to ubiquinone (CoQ), reducing it to ubiquinol ($\text{CoQH}_2$). The energy released drives the translocation of 4 $\text{H}^+$ from the matrix to the intermembrane space.

$$\text{NADH} + \text{H}^+ + \text{CoQ} \;\rightarrow\; \text{NAD}^+ + \text{CoQH}_2 \qquad (4\;\text{H}^+\;\text{pumped})$$

Complex II: Succinate Dehydrogenase

This is the same enzyme as Step 6 of the TCA cycle. It oxidizes succinate to fumarate, transferring electrons from covalently bound FAD through three Fe-S clusters to ubiquinone. Complex II is the smallest ETC complex (4 subunits) and is unique in that it does not pump any protons. The relatively small free energy change of the succinate/fumarate couple ($E^{\circ\prime} = +0.031$ V) is insufficient to drive proton translocation.

$$\text{Succinate} + \text{CoQ} \;\rightarrow\; \text{Fumarate} + \text{CoQH}_2 \qquad (0\;\text{H}^+\;\text{pumped})$$

Complex III: Ubiquinol-Cytochrome c Oxidoreductase

Also called the cytochrome bc$_1$ complex. It accepts electrons from $\text{CoQH}_2$ and transfers them one at a time to the soluble carrier cytochrome c via the Q cycle mechanism. The Q cycle effectively doubles the number of protons translocated per pair of electrons by recycling one electron from ubiquinol back to ubiquinone on the matrix side. The result is 4 $\text{H}^+$ transferred per pair of electrons (2 from $\text{CoQH}_2$ oxidation + 2 from Q cycle).

$$\text{CoQH}_2 + 2\;\text{Cyt}\;c_{\text{ox}} \;\rightarrow\; \text{CoQ} + 2\;\text{Cyt}\;c_{\text{red}} + 2\text{H}^+_{\text{IMS}} \qquad (4\;\text{H}^+\;\text{pumped total})$$

Complex IV: Cytochrome c Oxidase

The terminal oxidase of the ETC. It accepts electrons from reduced cytochrome c and transfers them through a Cu$_\text{A}$ center, heme a, and a binuclear heme a$_3$-Cu$_\text{B}$ center to molecular oxygen, reducing it to water. For each pair of electrons, 2 $\text{H}^+$ are pumped across the membrane, and 2 additional $\text{H}^+$ are consumed from the matrix to form water (so-called β€œscalar” protons).

$$2\;\text{Cyt}\;c_{\text{red}} + \tfrac{1}{2}\text{O}_2 + 2\text{H}^+_{\text{matrix}} \;\rightarrow\; 2\;\text{Cyt}\;c_{\text{ox}} + \text{H}_2\text{O} \qquad (2\;\text{H}^+\;\text{pumped})$$

Summary of Proton Pumping

Total protons pumped per NADH: Complex I (4) + Complex III (4) + Complex IV (2) = 10 $\text{H}^+$. Total protons pumped per $\text{FADH}_2$: Complex II (0) + Complex III (4) + Complex IV (2) = 6 $\text{H}^+$. This difference in proton yield is the fundamental reason why NADH generates more ATP than $\text{FADH}_2$.

Redox Potentials and Free Energy

The driving force for electron transport is the difference in standard reduction potential ($\Delta E^{\circ\prime}$) between donor and acceptor redox couples. The total redox span from NADH to $\text{O}_2$ is:

$$\Delta E^{\circ\prime}_{\text{total}} = E^{\circ\prime}(\text{O}_2/\text{H}_2\text{O}) - E^{\circ\prime}(\text{NAD}^+/\text{NADH}) = +0.816 - (-0.320) = +1.136\;\text{V}$$

The free energy available from each electron transfer step is related to the redox potential difference by the Nernst-related equation:

$$\Delta G^{\circ\prime} = -nF\Delta E^{\circ\prime}$$

where $n$ is the number of electrons transferred (2 for each NADH or $\text{FADH}_2$) and $F$ is the Faraday constant (96,485 C/mol). For each complex, the free energy captured is:

Complex$\Delta E^{\circ\prime}$ (V)$\Delta G^{\circ\prime}$ (kJ/mol)$\text{H}^+$ pumped
Complex I$+0.365$$-70.4$4
Complex III$+0.190$$-36.7$4
Complex IV$+0.581$$-112.1$2

The sum of the free energies ($-70.4 - 36.7 - 112.1 = -219.2$ kJ/mol) closely matches the total $\Delta G^{\circ\prime} = -218.5$ kJ/mol, confirming that nearly all the available energy is partitioned among the three proton-pumping complexes. Complex II, which does not pump protons, captures a much smaller fraction of the total redox potential.

Chemiosmotic Theory

The chemiosmotic hypothesis, proposed by Peter Mitchell in 1961 (Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 1978), explains how the energy from electron transport is coupled to ATP synthesis. Mitchell's revolutionary insight was that the free energy of electron transfer is not used to directly drive a chemical reaction, but instead creates an electrochemical proton gradient across the inner mitochondrial membrane.

The proton-motive force (pmf, or $\Delta p$) has two components: a chemical gradient ($\Delta\text{pH}$) and an electrical potential ($\Delta\psi$):

$$\Delta p = \Delta\psi - \frac{2.303\,RT}{F}\,\Delta\text{pH}$$

At physiological temperature (37$^\circ$C, T = 310.15 K), the factor $2.303\,RT/F \approx 61.5$ mV, giving:

$$\Delta p \approx \Delta\psi + 61.5 \cdot \Delta\text{pH} \quad\text{(mV)}$$

In mitochondria, the membrane potential ($\Delta\psi \approx 150\text{--}180$ mV, matrix negative) dominates over the pH gradient ($\Delta\text{pH} \approx 0.5\text{--}1.0$ units, matrix alkaline). Typical values give a total proton-motive force of approximately 180–220 mV, corresponding to a free energy of about $-21$ kJ/mol per proton translocated.

Key Evidence for Chemiosmosis

  • Intact membrane required: Electron transport and ATP synthesis are uncoupled if the inner membrane is disrupted or made permeable to protons.
  • Proton gradient is sufficient: Artificially imposed pH gradients can drive ATP synthesis in the absence of electron transport.
  • Uncouplers dissipate the gradient: Small hydrophobic weak acids (DNP, FCCP) shuttle protons across the membrane, collapsing $\Delta p$ and stimulating electron transport while abolishing ATP synthesis.
  • Ionophores verify the components: Valinomycin (K$^+$ ionophore) collapses $\Delta\psi$; nigericin ($\text{K}^+/\text{H}^+$ exchanger) collapses $\Delta\text{pH}$. Either alone partially inhibits; together they abolish ATP synthesis.

ATP Synthase (Complex V)

ATP synthase is a remarkable molecular machine β€” a rotary motor that converts the proton-motive force into the chemical energy of ATP. It consists of two functionally distinct domains:

F$_0$ Domain (Membrane Portion)

  • c-ring: Composed of 8–15 identical c-subunits (number varies by species; 8 in bovine, 10 in yeast, 15 in some bacteria). Each c-subunit contains a proton-binding carboxylate residue (Asp or Glu).
  • a-subunit: Contains two half-channels for proton access β€” one open to the intermembrane space, one to the matrix. Protons enter from the IMS side, bind to c-subunit carboxylates, ride the ring as it rotates, and exit from the matrix side.
  • b-subunit dimer: Forms the peripheral stalk connecting F$_0$ to F$_1$, acting as a stator to prevent co-rotation of the $\alpha_3\beta_3$ hexamer.

F$_1$ Domain (Matrix Portion)

  • $\alpha_3\beta_3$ hexamer: The catalytic head, shaped like a flattened sphere. The three $\beta$-subunits contain the catalytic sites for ATP synthesis; the three $\alpha$-subunits are regulatory/structural.
  • $\gamma$-subunit: The central asymmetric shaft that rotates within the $\alpha_3\beta_3$ hexamer. Its asymmetry drives sequential conformational changes in the $\beta$-subunits.
  • $\delta$ and $\varepsilon$ subunits: Connect the $\gamma$-shaft to the c-ring, coupling c-ring rotation to $\gamma$-subunit rotation.

Paul Boyer's binding change mechanism (Nobel Prize 1997, shared with John Walker) describes how the three $\beta$-subunits cycle through three conformational states:

  • Open (O): Low affinity for substrates and products. ADP and P$_i$ bind; ATP is released.
  • Loose (L): Binds ADP + P$_i$ loosely. Substrates are trapped but not yet catalyzed.
  • Tight (T): Catalyzes the formation of ATP from bound ADP + P$_i$. ATP is bound very tightly ($K_d \sim 10^{-12}$ M). The energy input from proton flow is needed primarily to release the product ATP, not to drive the condensation reaction itself.

Each 120$^\circ$ rotation of the $\gamma$-subunit converts one $\beta$-subunit from T $\rightarrow$ O (releasing ATP), one from O $\rightarrow$ L (binding substrates), and one from L $\rightarrow$ T (forming ATP). A full 360$^\circ$ rotation produces 3 ATP molecules. The number of $\text{H}^+$ required per full rotation equals the number of c-subunits in the c-ring.

For a c-ring with 10 subunits (yeast/mammalian consensus), approximately 10/3 $\approx$ 3.3 $\text{H}^+$ flow through F$_0$ per ATP synthesized. Including the 1 $\text{H}^+$ consumed by the phosphate carrier (which imports P$_i$ in symport with $\text{H}^+$), the total cost is approximately 4 $\text{H}^+$ per ATP. This gives the P/O ratios:

$$\text{NADH:}\quad \frac{10\;\text{H}^+}{4\;\text{H}^+/\text{ATP}} = 2.5\;\text{ATP per NADH}$$
$$\text{FADH}_2:\quad \frac{6\;\text{H}^+}{4\;\text{H}^+/\text{ATP}} = 1.5\;\text{ATP per FADH}_2$$

Total ATP Yield from Glucose

We can now calculate the complete ATP yield from the aerobic oxidation of one glucose molecule through glycolysis, pyruvate dehydrogenase, the TCA cycle, and oxidative phosphorylation:

SourceDirect YieldATP Equivalents
Glycolysis (substrate-level)2 ATP2
Glycolysis (NADH)2 NADH5 (or 3)*
Pyruvate dehydrogenase2 NADH5
TCA cycle (NADH)6 NADH15
TCA cycle ($\text{FADH}_2$)2 $\text{FADH}_2$3
TCA cycle (GTP)2 GTP2
TOTAL30–32
$$\text{Total ATP} = 2 + 5 + 5 + 15 + 3 + 2 = 32\;\text{ATP per glucose (malate-aspartate shuttle)}$$

*The yield from glycolytic NADH depends on which shuttle system transports the electrons into the mitochondria, since the inner mitochondrial membrane is impermeable to NADH:

  • Malate-aspartate shuttle (heart, liver, kidney): Transfers electrons to mitochondrial NAD$^+$, producing NADH inside the matrix. Yield: 2.5 ATP per cytoplasmic NADH ($\rightarrow$ 32 ATP total).
  • Glycerol-3-phosphate shuttle (skeletal muscle, brain): Transfers electrons to mitochondrial FAD, producing $\text{FADH}_2$. Yield: 1.5 ATP per cytoplasmic NADH ($\rightarrow$ 30 ATP total).

Fortran: ETC Redox Potential Calculator

The following Fortran program computes the complete energetics of the electron transport chain using double-precision arithmetic. It calculates the redox potential drop ($\Delta E^{\circ\prime}$) and free energy change ($\Delta G^{\circ\prime} = -nF\Delta E^{\circ\prime}$) for each complex, the proton-motive force at 37$^\circ$C, P/O ratios, and the total ATP balance sheet for complete glucose oxidation.

Electron Transport Chain: Complete Energy Analysis

Fortran

Calculates redox potentials, free energies, proton-motive force, and ATP yield using Fortran double precision

etc_energetics.f90185 lines

Click Run to execute the Fortran code

Code will be compiled with gfortran and executed on the server

Key Concepts

1. Electrons from NADH traverse Complexes I $\rightarrow$ III $\rightarrow$ IV, while $\text{FADH}_2$ electrons enter at Complex II, bypassing Complex I. This accounts for the different ATP yields (2.5 vs. 1.5).

2. The total redox span from $\text{NAD}^+/\text{NADH}$ to $\text{O}_2/\text{H}_2\text{O}$ is +1.136 V, corresponding to $\Delta G^{\circ\prime} = -218.5$ kJ/mol β€” partitioned among three proton-pumping complexes.

3. The chemiosmotic theory (Mitchell, 1961) established that electron transport creates a proton-motive force ($\Delta p = \Delta\psi + 61.5 \cdot \Delta\text{pH}$ mV at 37$^\circ$C) across the inner mitochondrial membrane.

4. ATP synthase is a rotary molecular motor: proton flow through the F$_0$ c-ring drives $\gamma$-subunit rotation within the F$_1$ $\alpha_3\beta_3$ hexamer, cycling each $\beta$-subunit through Open $\rightarrow$ Loose $\rightarrow$ Tight conformations (Boyer's binding change mechanism).

5. Approximately 4 $\text{H}^+$ are required per ATP synthesized (3 through ATP synthase + 1 for phosphate import), giving P/O ratios of 2.5 (NADH) and 1.5 ($\text{FADH}_2$).

6. Complete aerobic oxidation of one glucose yields 30–32 ATP, depending on the NADH shuttle used for glycolytic NADH. This represents ~34% thermodynamic efficiency compared to the free energy of glucose combustion ($\Delta G^{\circ\prime} = -2,840$ kJ/mol).

7. Uncouplers (DNP, FCCP) dissipate the proton gradient without inhibiting electron transport, converting the energy to heat. This is the mechanism of thermogenesis by UCP1 (thermogenin) in brown adipose tissue.