Landau Parameters
Decomposing quasiparticle interactions into angular momentum channels and extracting measurable quantities
4.1 Decomposition in Angular Momentum Channels
In Landau's Fermi liquid theory, the quasiparticle interaction function $f(\mathbf{k}, \mathbf{k}')$ depends on the angle between the two momenta on the Fermi surface. For a rotationally invariant system, this function depends only on the angle $\theta$ between $\mathbf{k}$ and $\mathbf{k}'$. We can therefore expand it in Legendre polynomials:
Legendre polynomial expansion of the interaction function
The factor $(2l+1)$ is conventional and ensures that $f_l$ equals the average of$f(\theta)$ weighted by $P_l(\cos\theta)$:
Each angular momentum channel $l$ corresponds to a distinct physical process. The $l = 0$ channel describes isotropic (s-wave) interactions, $l = 1$ captures p-wave (dipolar) interactions related to current-current coupling, and higher channels describe increasingly anisotropic scattering processes.
Key Insight: In practice, for most Fermi liquids, only $f_0$ and $f_1$ are large. Higher harmonics are suppressed because the interaction is relatively smooth on the Fermi surface. This makes the Landau parameter framework extraordinarily powerful: a small number of parameters captures the full low-energy physics.
4.2 Symmetric and Antisymmetric Parameters
Since quasiparticles carry spin-1/2, the interaction function has two independent components corresponding to the spin channel. For two quasiparticles with spins $\sigma$ and $\sigma'$, we decompose:
Spin decomposition of the interaction function
Symmetric (Spin) Channel: $f^s$
The spin-symmetric part describes density-density interactions. It governs:
- - Effective mass renormalization
- - Compressibility
- - Sound velocity
- - Specific heat enhancement
Antisymmetric (Spin) Channel: $f^a$
The spin-antisymmetric part describes spin-spin interactions. It governs:
- - Spin susceptibility
- - Paramagnetic properties
- - Spin-wave collective modes
- - Wilson ratio
Each channel is independently expanded in Legendre polynomials:
4.3 Dimensionless Landau Parameters
It is conventional and physically illuminating to define dimensionless Landau parameters by multiplying by the density of states at the Fermi level:
Dimensionless Landau parameters, where $N(0) = m^* k_F / (\pi^2 \hbar^2)$ (3D)
The density of states $N(0)$ involves the renormalized effective mass $m^*$, not the bare mass. This is crucial because $m^*$ itself depends on $F_1^s$, creating a self-consistency condition. The dimensionless parameters $F_l$ are the natural measure of interaction strength: when$|F_l| \ll 1$, the system is weakly interacting in that channel, while $|F_l| \sim 1$ or larger indicates strong correlations.
Important: The dimensionless Landau parameters are not small perturbative corrections. For liquid $^3$He near ambient pressure, $F_0^s \approx 10$ and $F_1^s \approx 6$, indicating an extremely strongly interacting Fermi liquid. Yet the Landau framework remains valid because it is based on the existence of quasiparticles, not on weak interactions.
4.4 Physical Observables from Landau Parameters
The power of the Landau parameter framework is that all thermodynamic and transport properties of the Fermi liquid at low temperatures can be expressed in terms of a few parameters. Here are the central results:
Effective Mass
The p-wave symmetric parameter renormalizes the mass through backflow currents
This relation encodes the Galilean invariance of the system. The effective mass $m^*$ determines the linear specific heat coefficient $\gamma = (\pi^2/3) k_B^2 N(0)$, which is directly measurable.
Compressibility
$\kappa_0$ is the free Fermi gas compressibility; $F_0^s$ stiffens/softens the equation of state
Spin Susceptibility
$\chi_0$ is the Pauli susceptibility; $F_0^a$ controls paramagnetic enhancement
Sound Velocities
First sound velocity (hydrodynamic, collisional regime)
Zero sound velocity (collisionless regime)
Wilson Ratio
The Wilson ratio isolates the spin-antisymmetric interaction
4.5 Pomeranchuk Stability Conditions
The Fermi liquid is stable only if the Fermi surface does not undergo a spontaneous deformation. Pomeranchuk (1958) showed that stability in each angular momentum channel requires:
Pomeranchuk stability conditions for each channel
Violation of any one of these inequalities signals an instability of the Fermi liquid ground state toward a spontaneous symmetry breaking:
$F_0^s < -1$
Negative compressibility: the system phase separates. This is the liquid-gas phase transition, realized in$^3$He at very low densities.
$F_0^a < -1$
Divergent spin susceptibility: the system becomes ferromagnetic (Stoner instability). This is approached but never reached in normal $^3$He.
$F_1^s < -3$
Negative effective mass: current instability. The quasiparticle picture breaks down and the system develops spontaneous currents.
$F_l^{s,a} < -(2l+1)$ (general)
Spontaneous Fermi surface distortion with angular momentum $l$ symmetry. These are called Pomeranchuk instabilities or nematic Fermi surface transitions.
Modern Relevance: Pomeranchuk instabilities in the $l = 2$ channel ($F_2^s < -5$) have been proposed as the origin of nematic order in certain strongly correlated electron systems, including iron-based superconductors and some quantum Hall states.
4.6 Measured Values for He-3 and Electron Systems
Liquid Helium-3
Liquid $^3$He is the prototypical Fermi liquid. The Landau parameters have been determined from thermodynamic and transport measurements at low temperatures (T < 100 mK) and various pressures:
| Parameter | P = 0 bar | P = 27 bar | Physical Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| $F_0^s$ | 10.07 | 75.63 | Compressibility |
| $F_1^s$ | 6.05 | 14.29 | Effective mass |
| $F_0^a$ | -0.525 | -0.741 | Spin susceptibility |
| $F_1^a$ | -0.56 | -0.41 | Spin current |
| $m^*/m$ | 3.02 | 5.76 | $1 + F_1^s/3$ |
Electron Gas (Jellium Model)
For the electron gas at metallic densities ($r_s \sim 2\text{--}5$), the situation is quite different. The long-range Coulomb interaction makes $F_0^s$ diverge, but this divergence is exactly cancelled by the uniform positive background (jellium), and the screened interaction gives finite parameters:
- - $F_0^s$ is large and positive (strong screening), but physical observables remain well-defined via the compressibility sum rule
- - $F_1^s$ is typically small ($m^*/m \approx 1$ for $r_s < 3$)
- - $F_0^a$ is negative and small in magnitude (weak exchange enhancement of susceptibility)
- - In real metals, band structure effects complicate the picture, but the Landau framework remains applicable with appropriate modifications
4.7 Connection to Forward Scattering Amplitude
The Landau interaction function has a deep connection to scattering theory. The quasiparticle interaction$f(\theta)$ can be related to the forward scattering amplitude of two quasiparticles on the Fermi surface:
The interaction function equals the forward (zero momentum transfer) scattering amplitude
This identification is more than formal. It connects the phenomenological Landau parameters to microscopic many-body theory:
1. Perturbation Theory
In weak coupling, $f_l$ can be computed order-by-order in the interaction strength. For the electron gas, the leading terms come from direct (Hartree) and exchange (Fock) diagrams, plus screening corrections (RPA).
2. Sum Rules
The forward scattering amplitude satisfies sum rules related to conservation laws. For example, Galilean invariance requires $m^*/m = 1 + F_1^s/3$, while particle number conservation constrains the compressibility relation.
3. Renormalization Group
Shankar (1994) showed that the Landau Fermi liquid theory emerges naturally as the low-energy fixed point of a renormalization group analysis. The Landau parameters are the marginal couplings of this fixed point, and the forward scattering channel is the only one that survives at low energies.
The scattering amplitude also connects to the quasiparticle lifetime. While forward scattering does not decay the quasiparticle (it only shifts energy), the full scattering amplitude at finite momentum transfer gives the $T^2$ lifetime:
Quasiparticle decay rate: forward scattering gives the Landau parameters, finite-angle scattering gives the lifetime
Key Takeaways
- - The quasiparticle interaction $f(\theta)$ decomposes into angular momentum channels $f_l$ via Legendre polynomials
- - Spin structure gives symmetric ($F_l^s$) and antisymmetric ($F_l^a$) parameters, each controlling distinct physics
- - Dimensionless $F_l = N(0) f_l$ measures interaction strength; can be large (strongly interacting) while Fermi liquid theory remains valid
- - Pomeranchuk stability $F_l^{s,a} > -(2l+1)$ prevents spontaneous Fermi surface deformations
- - All low-temperature observables ($m^*, \kappa, \chi, c_1$) expressible in terms of $F_0^s, F_0^a, F_1^s$
- - Helium-3 is the paradigmatic strongly interacting Fermi liquid with large, well-measured Landau parameters
- - Forward scattering amplitude connects phenomenology to microscopic theory and renormalization group
Detailed Derivations
Derivation of the Pomeranchuk stability conditions
The Pomeranchuk conditions follow from requiring that the energy cost of any infinitesimal Fermi surface deformation be positive.
Step 1: Consider a general deformation of the Fermi surface parametrized by:
where $\nu_\sigma(\hat{\mathbf{k}})$ is the deformation amplitude. Expand in spherical harmonics: $\nu_\sigma(\hat{\mathbf{k}}) = \sum_{lm} \nu_{lm}^\sigma\,Y_{lm}(\hat{\mathbf{k}})$.
Step 2: The energy change to second order in $\delta n$ is:
Step 3: The kinetic energy contribution is $\sum_{\mathbf{k}\sigma} \epsilon_k^{(0)}\,\delta n_{\mathbf{k}\sigma} = N^*(0)\sum_{lm\sigma} |\nu_{lm}^\sigma|^2 / 2$. The interaction term decomposes into angular momentum channels using the addition theorem for spherical harmonics:
Step 4: Decomposing into spin-symmetric ($\nu^s = \nu_\uparrow + \nu_\downarrow$) and spin-antisymmetric ($\nu^a = \nu_\uparrow - \nu_\downarrow$) channels, the total energy change becomes:
Step 5: For the Fermi liquid to be stable, $\delta E > 0$ for all possible deformations. This requires each coefficient to be positive:
When any condition is violated, the corresponding Fermi surface deformation lowers the energy, signaling a spontaneous symmetry breaking (Pomeranchuk instability).
Derivation of the first sound velocity $c_1$ from the Landau parameters
Step 1: First sound is an adiabatic density wave in the hydrodynamic (collision-dominated) regime. The velocity is $c_1^2 = (\partial P / \partial \rho)_s = n\,\partial\mu/\partial n$ at constant entropy per particle.
Step 2: From the compressibility result, $\partial\mu/\partial n = (1 + F_0^s)/N^*(0)$. Using $N^*(0) = m^* k_F / (\pi^2\hbar^2)$ and $n = k_F^3 / (3\pi^2)$:
Step 3: Recognizing $v_F^* = \hbar k_F / m^*$ as the renormalized Fermi velocity:
Or equivalently, in terms of the bare Fermi velocity:
For liquid He-3 at zero pressure: $F_0^s \approx 10$, $F_1^s \approx 6$, giving $c_1 \approx v_F \cdot \sqrt{11/3}/3 \approx 183$ m/s, in excellent agreement with experiment.
Derivation of the Wilson ratio
Step 1: The Wilson ratio is defined as:
Step 2: Substitute the Fermi liquid results: $\chi = \chi_0 \cdot (m^*/m)/(1 + F_0^a)$ and $\gamma = \gamma_0 \cdot m^*/m$. The ratio is:
Step 3: For the free Fermi gas, $(\pi^2 k_B^2 / 3\mu_B^2)(\chi_0/\gamma_0) = 1$, so:
The Wilson ratio isolates the spin-antisymmetric interaction: $R_W > 1$ for negative $F_0^a$ (enhanced spin fluctuations), and $R_W \to \infty$ at the Stoner instability $F_0^a \to -1$. For He-3, $R_W \approx 1/(1 - 0.67) \approx 3$. In heavy-fermion metals, $R_W$ values of 2โ5 are common, indicating strong exchange enhancement. A Wilson ratio of exactly 2 characterizes the single-impurity Kondo effect.
Derivation 2: Forward Scattering Amplitude and Landau Parameters
The Landau interaction function can be connected rigorously to microscopic scattering amplitudes. This derivation shows how the phenomenological parameters arise from the second functional derivative of the energy.
Step 1: The total energy of the Fermi liquid is a functional of the quasiparticle distribution $n_k$. The Landau interaction function is defined as the second functional derivative:
This quantity represents the change in energy of quasiparticle $k$ when quasiparticle $k'$ is added to the system. Physically, it is the forward scattering amplitude for two quasiparticles on the Fermi surface.
Step 2: For a rotationally invariant system, $f_{kk'}$ depends only on the angle $\theta$ between $\mathbf{k}$ and $\mathbf{k}'$ (both on the Fermi surface). We decompose the scattering amplitude using Legendre polynomials:
The orthogonality of Legendre polynomials allows extraction of each component:
Step 3: Define dimensionless Landau parameters by multiplying by the density of states at the Fermi level:
where $N(0) = m^* k_F / (\pi^2 \hbar^2)$ in three dimensions. The dimensionless parameters $F_\ell$ measure the interaction strength relative to the kinetic energy scale at the Fermi surface.
Step 4: Including spin, we separate symmetric and antisymmetric channels. The physical meaning of the leading parameters is:
$F_0^s$ (s-wave, spin-symmetric): Controls the compressibility $\kappa/\kappa_0 = (m^*/m)/(1 + F_0^s)$. A positive $F_0^s$ stiffens the equation of state (repulsive density-density interaction), while $F_0^s \to -1$ drives the compressibility to infinity, signaling phase separation.
$F_0^a$ (s-wave, spin-antisymmetric): Controls the spin susceptibility $\chi/\chi_0 = (m^*/m)/(1 + F_0^a)$. A negative $F_0^a$ enhances the paramagnetic response. At $F_0^a = -1$, the susceptibility diverges (Stoner ferromagnetic instability).
$F_1^s$ (p-wave, spin-symmetric): Renormalizes the effective mass via $m^*/m = 1 + F_1^s/3$. This relation is exact and follows from Galilean invariance: the backflow of surrounding quasiparticles when one quasiparticle moves increases its inertia. A large positive $F_1^s$ (as in He-3) indicates that each quasiparticle drags a substantial cloud of excitations.
The forward scattering interpretation makes the connection to microscopic theory transparent: $f_\ell$ can in principle be computed from many-body perturbation theory (Feynman diagrams), quantum Monte Carlo, or extracted from experiment. The Landau framework guarantees that only these few numbers are needed for all low-energy physics.
Derivation 3: Stability Conditions (Pomeranchuk Criteria)
We derive the Pomeranchuk stability conditions $F_\ell^{s,a} > -(2\ell+1)$ for each angular momentum channel, showing that violation leads to spontaneous Fermi surface deformation.
Step 1: Consider an infinitesimal deformation of the equilibrium Fermi surface. Parametrize the local Fermi momentum as:
The corresponding change in the occupation function is $\delta n_{k\sigma} = -\delta(\epsilon_k - \mu) \, \hbar v_F \, \delta k_F(\hat{\mathbf{k}}, \sigma)$. Expand the deformation in spherical harmonics:
Step 2: The energy change has two contributions: kinetic energy (cost of moving quasiparticles away from the equilibrium Fermi surface) and interaction energy (from the Landau function). Computing to second order:
where $u^s = u^\uparrow + u^\downarrow$ and $u^a = u^\uparrow - u^\downarrow$ are the density and spin deformation amplitudes.
Step 3: Combining and using $F_\ell = N(0) f_\ell$, the total energy change in each channel becomes:
Step 4: Stability requires $\delta E > 0$ for all possible deformations. Since each $(\ell, m)$ channel is independent, we need every coefficient to be positive:
Step 5: Physical consequences of violation. When a Pomeranchuk condition is violated, the corresponding Fermi surface deformation lowers the total energy, triggering a phase transition:
$F_0^s = -1$ (phase separation): The compressibility $\kappa \propto 1/(1 + F_0^s)$ diverges and then becomes negative. The uniform liquid is unstable against density fluctuations: it spontaneously separates into high-density and low-density phases (spinodal decomposition). This is the liquid-gas transition in He-3 at very low densities.
$F_0^a = -1$ (ferromagnetic instability): The spin susceptibility $\chi \propto 1/(1 + F_0^a)$ diverges. The system spontaneously magnetizes (Stoner transition). The Fermi surfaces for spin-up and spin-down become unequal, breaking time-reversal symmetry. In He-3, $F_0^a \approx -0.7$ at the melting pressure โ close but not reaching the instability.
$F_1^s = -3$ (negative effective mass): The effective mass $m^* = m(1 + F_1^s/3)$ vanishes and then becomes negative. The quasiparticle picture breaks down entirely: the group velocity reverses relative to the momentum. The system develops spontaneous currents (current instability). This condition is never approached in known Fermi liquids.
Higher-order Pomeranchuk instabilities ($\ell \geq 2$) break rotational symmetry of the Fermi surface without changing the total density or magnetization. The $\ell = 2$ case produces an ellipsoidal Fermi surface โ a "nematic" Fermi liquid that has been observed in several strongly correlated materials.
Derivation 4: Transport Equation and Collective Mode Dispersion
We derive the linearized Boltzmann transport equation for Landau quasiparticles and show how the Landau interaction term gives rise to collective modes.
Step 1: In kinetic theory, the quasiparticle distribution function $n_{k\sigma}(\mathbf{r}, t)$ obeys the Boltzmann equation. For small deviations from equilibrium, write $n_{k\sigma} = n_k^0 + \delta n_{k\sigma}$. The linearized transport equation is:
where $\mathbf{v}_k = \nabla_k \epsilon_k / \hbar$ is the quasiparticle group velocity and $I_{\text{coll}}$ is the collision integral.
Step 2: The crucial feature of Fermi liquid theory is the molecular field (or mean-field) term. The local quasiparticle energy is modified by the surrounding perturbation:
The molecular field $\delta\epsilon_{k\sigma} = \sum_{k'\sigma'} f_{k\sigma, k'\sigma'} \, \delta n_{k'\sigma'}$ acts as an additional restoring force on the quasiparticles. This self-consistent coupling between quasiparticle motion and the interaction is the origin of collective modes in Fermi liquids.
Step 3: In the collisionless regime ($\omega \tau \gg 1$), drop the collision integral and seek plane-wave solutions $\delta n_{k\sigma} \propto e^{i(\mathbf{q} \cdot \mathbf{r} - \omega t)}$. Restrict to the Fermi surface by writing:
Substituting into the linearized equation and using $\mathbf{v}_k = v_F \hat{\mathbf{k}}$ on the Fermi surface:
Step 4: Define $s = \omega / (q v_F)$ and $\cos\alpha = \hat{\mathbf{q}} \cdot \hat{\mathbf{k}}$. For the spin-symmetric, $\ell = 0$ channel with isotropic perturbation $\nu(\hat{\mathbf{k}}) = \nu(\alpha)$, the equation becomes:
Solving for $\nu(\alpha) = A \cos\alpha / (s - \cos\alpha)$ and requiring self-consistency gives the eigenvalue equation for zero sound:
which can also be written as $s \coth^{-1}(s) = 1 + 1/F_0^s$. Solutions with $s > 1$ (phase velocity exceeding the Fermi velocity) represent propagating zero sound modes. For large $F_0^s$, $s \to \sqrt{(1 + F_0^s)/3}$, recovering the first sound result.
Step 5: The spin-antisymmetric channel ($F_0^a$ replacing $F_0^s$) gives spin zero sound: a propagating spin-density wave. Including higher harmonics $F_\ell$ couples different angular momentum channels and produces a richer spectrum of collective modes. The general eigenvalue problem is an infinite matrix equation in the $\ell$-basis, which in practice is truncated at low $\ell$.
Physical picture: The molecular field provides a self-consistent restoring force that allows collective oscillations to propagate even in the absence of collisions. In ordinary sound, collisions maintain local equilibrium and provide the restoring force. In zero sound, the Landau interaction itself plays this role. This is why zero sound exists in the collisionless regime $\omega \tau \gg 1$ (low temperature), while first sound exists in the hydrodynamic regime $\omega \tau \ll 1$ (higher temperature).
Historical Context
The decomposition of the Landau interaction function into angular momentum channels was introduced by Landau himself in his original 1956โ1957 papers, but the systematic extraction of the dimensionless parameters $F_l^{s,a}$ from experimental data became possible only with the advent of ultra-low temperature techniques in the 1960s and 1970s.
The definitive measurements of the He-3 Landau parameters were carried out by Daniel Greywall (Bell Labs, 1983) through precise specific heat measurements, and by John Wheatley and collaborators (UCSD, 1970s) through NMR susceptibility and sound velocity measurements. These experiments confirmed Landau's predictions quantitatively, establishing He-3 as the paradigmatic Fermi liquid. The pressure dependence of the Landau parameters revealed that He-3 becomes increasingly strongly interacting under compression, with $F_0^s$ increasing from $\sim 10$ at zero pressure to $\sim 76$ at the melting pressure.
The Pomeranchuk stability conditions were derived by Isaak Ya. Pomeranchuk in 1958. They have experienced a renaissance in the 2000sโ2010s as theoretical tools for understanding nematic electronic states in strongly correlated materials. The observation of electronic nematicity in Sr$_3$Ru$_2$O$_7$ (Borzi et al., 2007) and in iron-based superconductors has been interpreted in terms of $l = 2$ Pomeranchuk instabilities, bringing Landau's framework into direct contact with modern materials research.
Landau's Parameterization Philosophy
Landau's approach to the Fermi liquid was revolutionary in its philosophy: rather than attempting to solve the full many-body Schrรถdinger equation, he recognized that the low-energy physics of an interacting Fermi system is governed by a small number of phenomenological parameters. This is an early example of what would later be formalized as effective field theory โ the idea that low-energy physics is insensitive to microscopic details and can be captured by the most general Lagrangian consistent with the symmetries. Landau's parameterization anticipated the Wilsonian renormalization group by nearly two decades. The key insight was that the quasiparticle interaction on the Fermi surface is a marginal coupling: it neither grows nor decays under renormalization, and therefore must be retained as a free parameter of the effective theory. All irrelevant couplings (higher-energy processes, off-shell scattering) are absorbed into the values of the Landau parameters.
Experimental Determination in He-3
The experimental program to determine the Landau parameters of He-3 spanned several decades and involved multiple complementary techniques. Greywall's 1983 specific heat measurements at Bell Labs provided the definitive values of $m^*/m$ (and hence $F_1^s$) as a function of pressure, with an accuracy of better than 1%. Abel, Anderson, and Wheatley (1966) measured the spin susceptibility via NMR, extracting $F_0^a$. Sound velocity measurements by Halperin and Varoquaux and others provided $F_0^s$ through the first sound relation. The zero sound velocity, first observed by Abel, Anderson, and Wheatley in 1966, gave an independent check on $F_0^s$. Later, spin-wave experiments and transverse sound measurements constrained $F_1^a$ and higher harmonics. The remarkable consistency among these independent measurements โ all described by the same set of Landau parameters โ constitutes one of the strongest experimental validations of any many-body theory.
Modern Relevance
The Landau parameter framework continues to find new applications in 21st-century physics. In ultracold atomic gases, Feshbach resonances allow continuous tuning of $F_0$ from weak to strong coupling, enabling direct tests of Fermi liquid predictions. In heavy-fermion materials, effective masses as large as $m^*/m \sim 1000$ correspond to enormous values of $F_1^s$, pushing the Landau framework to its limits. The discovery of electronic nematicity in iron-based superconductors (FeSe, BaFe$_2$As$_2$) has been analyzed as a $d$-wave Pomeranchuk instability, connecting Landau's 1950s theory directly to modern materials science. In neutron star physics, the Landau parameters of dense nuclear matter determine the equation of state, neutrino emissivity, and collective oscillation modes that control neutron star cooling and gravitational wave signatures. The universality and economy of Landau's parameterization ensure its continued centrality in condensed matter and many-body physics.
Applications
Applications of the Landau Parameter Framework
Interactive Simulations
Pomeranchuk Stability Diagram: F_0^s vs F_1^s Plane
PythonClick Run to execute the Python code
Code will be executed with Python 3 on the server
Landau Parameters for He-3: Computing All Measurable Quantities
FortranClick Run to execute the Fortran code
Code will be compiled with gfortran and executed on the server