Audio data accumulates fast: a single forest recorder produces tens of gigabytes per month, and a network of such recorders quickly exceeds the capacity of any human listener. Acoustic indicesare numerical summaries that map a long recording onto one or a few real numbers correlating with biological activity, spectral complexity, or anthropogenic interference. They are the workhorse of large-scale ecoacoustic monitoring.
Acoustic Indices โ Quantifying Soundscapes
Acoustic indices are summary statistics computed from audio recordings that characterize the soundscape without requiring species identification.
The Acoustic Complexity Index (ACI)
$I_{k,j}$ is intensity in frequency band $k$ at time step $j$. High ACI = complex, modulated soundscape typical of high biodiversity.
Acoustic Entropy Index (H)
$H \in [0,1]$: pure tones $\to 0$; broadband noise $\to 1$. Intermediate values characterise rich biological soundscapes.
The NDSI โ Normalized Difference Soundscape Index
$\alpha$ = anthrophony band (1โ2 kHz), $\beta$ = biophony band (2โ11 kHz). NDSI $\in [-1,+1]$: $+1$ pristine, $-1$ degraded. Analogous to NDVI in remote sensing.
Summary of Major Indices
| Index | Authors | Measures | Proxy for |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACI | Pieretti 2011 | Temporal intensity modulation | Biotic richness |
| H | Sueur 2008 | Spectrotemporal entropy | Acoustic evenness |
| ADI | Pekin 2012 | Shannon diversity | Species richness |
| AEI | Villanueva-Rivera 2011 | Gini coefficient | Acoustic dominance |
| BI | Boelman 2007 | Mean energy 2โ8 kHz | Avian abundance |
| NDSI | Joo 2011 | Bio/anthropo ratio | Habitat intactness |
Index correlation and complementarity
No single index captures "ecosystem health". The ACI is sensitive to short-time amplitude modulation typical of bird song; the BI weighs biological vs anthropogenic bands; the NDSI is a bio/anthrophony ratio; the H (entropy) captures spectral evenness. Using two or three complementary indices in combination dramatically outperforms any single one.