Electromagnetic Waves in Media
Kramers-Kronig relations, plasma physics, Cherenkov radiation, and the microscopic theory of the dielectric response at the graduate level.
4.1 Microscopic Theory of the Dielectric Function
The dielectric function $\epsilon(\omega)$ relates the displacement field to the applied field: $\mathbf{D} = \epsilon(\omega)\mathbf{E}$. The Lorentz oscillator model treats bound electrons as damped harmonic oscillators:
where $f_j$ are oscillator strengths, $\omega_j$ are resonance frequencies, and $\gamma_j$ are damping rates. The sum rule $\sum_j f_j = Z$ ensures the correct high-frequency limit.
Derivation 1: Lorentz Oscillator Model for $\epsilon(\omega)$
We derive the frequency-dependent dielectric function from the microscopic response of bound electrons.
Step 1: Equation of motion for a bound electron
$$m_e\ddot{x} + m_e\gamma\dot{x} + m_e\omega_0^2 x = -eE_0 e^{-i\omega t}$$
The restoring force gives $\omega_0$; the damping $\gamma$ accounts for radiation and collisional losses.
Step 2: Steady-state displacement
$$x_0 = \frac{-eE_0/m_e}{\omega_0^2 - \omega^2 - i\gamma\omega}$$
Step 3: Polarization
The polarization (dipole moment per volume) for $N$ electrons per unit volume: $P = -Nex_0 = Ne^2 E_0/[m_e(\omega_0^2 - \omega^2 - i\gamma\omega)]$.
Step 4: Dielectric function
Since $\mathbf{D} = \epsilon_0\mathbf{E} + \mathbf{P} = \epsilon_0\epsilon_r\mathbf{E}$:
$$\epsilon_r(\omega) = 1 + \frac{Ne^2}{\epsilon_0 m_e}\frac{1}{\omega_0^2 - \omega^2 - i\gamma\omega}$$
Step 5: Multiple resonances and sum rules
Real atoms have multiple resonances. Introducing oscillator strengths $f_j$: $$\boxed{\epsilon_r(\omega) = 1 + \frac{Ne^2}{\epsilon_0 m_e}\sum_j\frac{f_j}{\omega_j^2 - \omega^2 - i\gamma_j\omega}}$$
The Thomas-Reiche-Kuhn sum rule $\sum_j f_j = Z$ guarantees that at very high frequencies, $\epsilon \to 1 - \omega_p^2/\omega^2$ where $\omega_p = \sqrt{NZe^2/(\epsilon_0 m_e)}$.
4.2 Kramers-Kronig Relations
Causality imposes fundamental constraints relating the real and imaginary parts of the dielectric function:
Derivation 2: Kramers-Kronig Relations from Causality
We derive the Kramers-Kronig relations from the analytic properties of $\chi(\omega)$ in the upper half of the complex frequency plane.
Step 1: Causality in the time domain
The response function $G(t) = \chi(t)$ (the inverse Fourier transform of the susceptibility) must vanish for $t < 0$: the polarization at time $t$ depends only on the field at earlier times.
Step 2: Analyticity in the upper half-plane
Since $G(t) = 0$ for $t < 0$, the Fourier transform $\chi(\omega) = \int_0^\infty G(t)e^{i\omega t}dt$ converges for $\text{Im}(\omega) > 0$. Therefore $\chi(\omega)$ is analytic in the upper half-plane.
Step 3: Apply Cauchy's integral formula
For $\omega$ on the real axis, close the contour in the upper half-plane:
$$\chi(\omega) = \frac{1}{i\pi}\mathcal{P}\!\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{\chi(\omega')}{\omega'-\omega}\,d\omega'$$
The $1/(i\pi)$ comes from the half-residue at the pole on the real axis.
Step 4: Separate real and imaginary parts
Taking real and imaginary parts of the Cauchy relation gives the two Kramers-Kronig dispersion relations.
Step 5: Physical significance
The real part (dispersion) and imaginary part (absorption) of $\chi$ are not independent: measuring the absorption spectrum over all frequencies determines the refractive index at every frequency, and vice versa. This is a profound consequence of causality alone.
4.3 EM Waves in Plasmas
A plasma is a gas of free charged particles. The Drude model (setting $\omega_0 = 0$ in the Lorentz model) gives:
Derivation 3: Plasma Frequency and Wave Propagation
We derive the dispersion relation for electromagnetic waves in a collisionless plasma.
Step 1: Equation of motion for free electrons
With no restoring force ($\omega_0 = 0$) and negligible collisions ($\gamma \to 0$): $m_e\ddot{x} = -eE$. For harmonic fields: $x_0 = eE_0/(m_e\omega^2)$.
Step 2: Dielectric function
$\epsilon(\omega) = 1 - \omega_p^2/\omega^2$ where $\omega_p = \sqrt{Ne^2/(\epsilon_0 m_e)}$.
Step 3: Dispersion relation
The wave equation gives $k^2 c^2 = \omega^2\epsilon = \omega^2 - \omega_p^2$, i.e.:
$$\omega^2 = \omega_p^2 + c^2 k^2$$
Step 4: Cutoff frequency
For $\omega < \omega_p$: $k^2 < 0$, the wave is evanescent. The plasma reflects waves below $\omega_p$. For the ionosphere: $f_p \sim 10$ MHz, reflecting AM radio signals around the Earth. For metals: $\omega_p \sim 10$ eV, making them reflective in the visible spectrum.
Step 5: Phase and group velocity
$$v_p = \frac{c}{\sqrt{1-\omega_p^2/\omega^2}} > c, \qquad v_g = c\sqrt{1-\omega_p^2/\omega^2} < c$$
The product $v_p v_g = c^2$. Information and energy travel at the group velocity, always less than $c$.
4.4 Cherenkov Radiation
When a charged particle moves faster than the phase velocity of light in a medium ($v > c/n$), it emits Cherenkov radiation in a cone:
Derivation 4: Cherenkov Angle and the Frank-Tamm Formula
We derive the Cherenkov radiation condition geometrically and compute the energy spectrum.
Step 1: Huygens construction
The particle at position $z = vt$ emits spherical wavelets expanding at speed $c/n$. When $v > c/n$, the envelope forms a Mach cone with half-angle $\theta_c$.
Step 2: Cone angle
From the geometry: the wavelet travels $(c/n)\Delta t$ while the particle travels $v\Delta t$. The angle satisfies $\cos\theta_c = (c/n)/(v) = 1/(n\beta)$.
Step 3: Frank-Tamm formula
The energy radiated per unit path length per unit frequency interval is:
$$\frac{d^2W}{dx\,d\omega} = \frac{\mu_0 q^2\omega}{4\pi}\left(1-\frac{1}{n^2(\omega)\beta^2}\right)$$
valid for frequencies where $n(\omega)\beta > 1$.
Step 4: Number of photons
Converting to photon number using $dW = \hbar\omega\,dN$:
$$\frac{d^2N}{dx\,d\omega} = \frac{\alpha}{\hbar c}\left(1-\frac{1}{n^2\beta^2}\right) \approx \frac{\alpha}{c}\sin^2\theta_c$$
where $\alpha \approx 1/137$ is the fine structure constant.
Step 5: Spectral character
Since $dN/d\omega \propto 1$ (constant per unit frequency), $dN/d\lambda \propto 1/\lambda^2$. More blue-UV photons are emitted than red, giving Cherenkov radiation its characteristic blue glow. The total number of visible photons is about 300 per cm for a relativistic particle in water.
4.5 Anomalous Dispersion and Absorption
Near a resonance, the index of refraction decreases with frequency (anomalous dispersion). In this region, the group velocity can exceed $c$ or become negative, but no information travels faster than light.
Derivation 5: Sum Rules and the f-Sum Rule
We derive the oscillator strength sum rule from the high-frequency behavior of the dielectric function.
Step 1: High-frequency limit
For $\omega \gg \omega_j$ for all $j$: $\epsilon(\omega) \to 1 - \omega_p^2/\omega^2$ where $\omega_p^2 = Ne^2\sum_j f_j/(\epsilon_0 m_e)$.
Step 2: Physical requirement at high frequencies
At $\omega \gg \omega_j$, all electrons respond as free particles regardless of binding. Thus $\omega_p^2 = NZe^2/(\epsilon_0 m_e)$ where $Z$ is the total number of electrons per atom.
Step 3: Thomas-Reiche-Kuhn sum rule
$$\boxed{\sum_j f_j = Z}$$
Step 4: Integral form (f-sum rule)
Equivalently: $\int_0^\infty\omega\,\text{Im}[\epsilon(\omega)]\,d\omega = \frac{\pi}{2}\omega_p^2$. This constrains the total integrated absorption.
Step 5: Connection to Kramers-Kronig
The sum rule is a consequence of the Kramers-Kronig relation evaluated at $\omega = 0$ combined with the known high-frequency behavior. It connects the microscopic quantum structure (oscillator strengths, related to transition matrix elements) to macroscopic optical properties.
Historical Notes
Kramers (1927) and Kronig (1926): Hendrik Kramers and Ralph Kronig independently derived the dispersion relations bearing their names, showing that causality alone constrains the relationship between absorption and dispersion.
Cherenkov (1934): Pavel Cherenkov observed the faint blue glow emitted by beta particles in water while working with Sergei Vavilov. Frank and Tamm provided the theoretical explanation in 1937. All three (Cherenkov, Frank, Tamm) shared the 1958 Nobel Prize.
Drude (1900): Paul Drude developed the free-electron model of metals, explaining their optical properties (reflectivity, absorption) in terms of a plasma of conduction electrons.
Lorentz (1878): Hendrik Lorentz developed the classical electron oscillator model for dielectric response, treating bound electrons as harmonically bound charges driven by the local electric field.
Applications
Cherenkov Detectors
RICH (Ring Imaging Cherenkov) detectors in particle physics measure the Cherenkov cone angle to identify particles. Super-Kamiokande uses 50,000 tons of water to detect neutrinos via Cherenkov radiation from secondary charged particles.
Plasmonics
Surface plasmon polaritons at metal-dielectric interfaces enable sub-wavelength optics. The Drude dielectric function determines the plasmon dispersion. Applications include biosensing, SERS, and nano-photonic circuits.
Ionospheric Propagation
The ionosphere acts as a plasma with $\omega_p \sim 2\pi\times 10$ MHz. Radio waves below this frequency are reflected, enabling long-range HF communication. GPS signals (1.5 GHz) pass through but experience group delay.
Metamaterials
Engineered structures with artificial Lorentz oscillators can produce negative $\epsilon$ and $\mu$ simultaneously, enabling negative refraction, perfect lensing, and electromagnetic cloaking based on the Kramers-Kronig constraints.
Simulation: EM in Media
This simulation visualizes the Lorentz dielectric function with real and imaginary parts, plasma reflectance and the Drude model, Cherenkov radiation angle and photon yield versus particle velocity, and a numerical verification of the Kramers-Kronig relations.
EM in Media: Kramers-Kronig, Plasma & Cherenkov Radiation
PythonClick Run to execute the Python code
Code will be executed with Python 3 on the server