courseshub.world · Lives in Mathematics and Physics

Jean-Pierre Serre

Jean-Pierre Serre

A course on the mathematician who reshaped topology at twenty-four, algebraic geometry at twenty-nine, and number theory for the following half-century, and whose books taught three generations how to write mathematics.

Born 15 September 1926, Bages Living Fields Medal 1954, aged 27 Level advanced undergraduate → graduate
The \(E^2\) page for \(\Omega S^3\to PS^3\to S^3\). The total space is contractible, so every arrow \(d^3\) must be an isomorphism; this forces \(H_q(\Omega S^3)=\mathbb Z\) in every even degree.
Lesson 00

How to use this course

Jean-Pierre Serre has worked in three fields, and in each he changed the basic tools. His thesis gave topologists the spectral sequence of a fibration and the first general theorems on homotopy groups of spheres. His papers of 1955 and 1956 brought sheaf cohomology into algebraic geometry. From about 1959 he turned to number theory, where his work on Galois representations led, through his 1987 modularity conjecture, to the proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem. He received the first Abel Prize in 2003 and turned 100 in September 2026.

Prerequisites for Part II
  • Lessons 04–05: singular homology and the fundamental group; the long exact sequence of a fibration in homotopy.
  • Lessons 06–07: a first course in algebraic geometry (varieties, sheaves) and some complex analysis in several variables.
  • Lesson 08: Galois theory, \(p\)-adic numbers and group cohomology in low degrees.
  • Lesson 09: free groups and presentations.
  • Lesson 10: elliptic curves and modular forms at the level of a first graduate course.

Each technical lesson opens with a paragraph for the general reader, then gives precise statements, proof sketches and exercises with folded solutions. The lessons follow the order in which he worked: topology (1950–1953), algebraic geometry (1953–1960), and number theory and group theory (from 1959 onward). Serre’s own books are the best companions to almost every lesson, and the reading list at the end says which.

Reference

Timeline

1926Born 15 September in Bages, Pyrénées-Orientales; both parents are pharmacists.
1932Primary school in Vauvert, near Nîmes.
1937Enters the Lycée de Nîmes.
1944First prize in mathematics at the Concours Général; baccalauréat.
1945Enters the École Normale Supérieure in Paris.
1948Agrégation. Joins the CNRS. Joins the Bourbaki group around this time, its youngest member.
1951Doctorate at the Sorbonne under Henri Cartan: Homologie singulière des espaces fibrés.
1953Groupes d’homotopie et classes de groupes abéliens: finiteness of homotopy groups of spheres.
1954Fields Medal at the International Congress in Amsterdam, aged 27. Teaches at Nancy, 1954–56.
1955Faisceaux algébriques cohérents (FAC). Serre duality.
1956Géométrie algébrique et géométrie analytique (GAGA). Elected to the chair of Algebra and Geometry at the Collège de France.
1960Kähler analogues of the Weil conjectures.
1962Corps locaux. Invited speaker at the International Congress in Stockholm.
1964Cohomologie galoisienne.
1970Cours d’arithmétique.
1972Open image theorem for elliptic curves.
1974Foreign Member of the Royal Society. Weight-one modular forms with Pierre Deligne.
1977Arbres, amalgames, SL\(_2\). Elected to the Académie des Sciences.
1985Balzan Prize.
1987Publishes his modularity conjecture for mod \(p\) Galois representations. CNRS Gold Medal.
1994Retires from the Collège de France; honorary professor.
1995AMS Steele Prize for Mathematical Exposition.
2000Wolf Prize in Mathematics, shared with Raoul Bott.
2003First Abel Prize.
2008–09Chandrashekhar Khare and Jean-Pierre Wintenberger prove the modularity conjecture.
2026Fifth volume of the Œuvres (June). Turns 100 on 15 September; the “Serre 100” conference at the Institut Henri Poincaré, 15–16 September, where he speaks remotely.
Part I · Formation
Lesson 01

Bages, Vauvert and Nîmes, 1926–1945

Jean-Pierre Serre was born on 15 September 1926 in Bages, a village in the Pyrénées-Orientales near Perpignan. His parents, Jean Serre and Adèle Diet, were both pharmacists; his mother had studied pharmacy at the University of Montpellier. He started primary school at Vauvert, in the Gard near Nîmes, in 1932.

In 1937 he entered the Lycée de Nîmes, now the Lycée Alphonse-Daudet. He has recalled that his interest in mathematics began early and that he first learned calculus on his own, from books at home. The war years passed in the provincial south. In 1944 he won first prize in mathematics at the Concours Général, the national competition for lycée pupils, and passed his baccalauréat. He stayed one more year at Nîmes to prepare for the entrance examination of the École Normale Supérieure, and entered it in 1945.

Two features of the later mathematician are already visible here. He learned by reading, alone, and he worked fast. Both would shape a career in which a large part of his influence came from books and letters as much as from papers.

Lesson 02

The École Normale and the Cartan seminar, 1945–1951

At the École Normale Supérieure, Serre came under the influence of Henri Cartan, who taught there and ran a weekly seminar that became the centre of French mathematics after the war. The Séminaire Cartan of these years worked through sheaf theory, the new spectral sequences of Jean Leray, and the homological algebra being built by Cartan and Samuel Eilenberg. Serre took the agrégation in 1948 and was given a research post at the CNRS, which he held until 1954.

Around 1948 he joined the Bourbaki group, the collective of French mathematicians writing a unified account of mathematics on axiomatic foundations. He was its youngest member, and he would write and revise Bourbaki drafts for many years. The group’s habits of complete definitions, structural thinking and relentless rewriting suited him.

Leray had invented sheaves and spectral sequences while a prisoner of war, to study the cohomology of a space fibred over another. His versions were technical and tied to particular cohomology theories. Serre’s task, set by Cartan, was to find out what spectral sequences could say about homotopy groups, the most difficult invariants in topology. He saw that Leray’s machinery could be adapted to singular homology and to a very general notion of fibration, which made it applicable to loop spaces and path spaces, where the old theory did not reach.

Lesson 03

The thesis and the Fields Medal, 1951–1954

Serre defended his thesis, Homologie singulière des espaces fibrés. Applications, at the Sorbonne in 1951; it appeared that year in the Annals of Mathematics. It introduced what is now called the Serre spectral sequence (Lesson 04) and used it to compute the homology of loop spaces. By applying it to the path-loop fibration he could, for the first time, prove general facts about the homotopy groups of spheres. In 1952 he lectured on these results in Princeton.

Over the next two years he developed the method with Cartan, using Eilenberg–MacLane spaces to “kill” homotopy groups one at a time. In 1953 his paper on classes of abelian groups proved that almost all homotopy groups of spheres are finite and located their first \(p\)-torsion (Lesson 05). At the same time, through the Cartan seminar, he took part in the theory of Stein manifolds, where Cartan’s Theorems A and B, proved with sheaf cohomology, gave a complete account of coherent analytic sheaves.

In 1954 the Fields Medal was awarded at the International Congress of Mathematicians in Amsterdam to Kunihiko Kodaira and to Serre, who was 27. He remains the youngest person ever to receive it. From 1954 to 1956 he taught at the University of Nancy. By then he had already begun to move from topology to algebraic geometry.

Part II · The mathematics
Lesson 04

The spectral sequence of a fibration

For the general reader. A fibration is a space built by attaching a copy of one space (the fibre) over each point of another (the base), in a way that is twisted globally but trivial locally. A spectral sequence is a bookkeeping device that computes the holes of the total space from the holes of the fibre and base, with corrections. Serre made this device work in exactly the setting topologists needed.

Goals
  • State the Serre spectral sequence in homology and cohomology.
  • Understand Serre fibrations and the path-loop fibration.
  • Compute the homology of \(\Omega S^n\) and the cohomology of \(\mathbb{CP}^n\).

Serre fibrations

A map \(\pi:E\to B\) is a Serre fibration if it has the homotopy lifting property for all cubes \(I^n\): every homotopy \(I^n\times I\to B\) whose start lifts to \(E\) lifts entirely. Fibre bundles are Serre fibrations. The key new example is the path fibration: for a pointed space \(B\), let \(PB\) be the space of paths starting at the base point, and \(\pi(\gamma)=\gamma(1)\). The fibre over the base point is the loop space \(\Omega B\), and \(PB\) is contractible. Serre’s weak hypothesis made this fibration available, and with it the loop space.

Theorem (Serre, 1951)

Let \(F\to E\to B\) be a Serre fibration with \(B\) path-connected and \(\pi_1(B)\) acting trivially on \(H_*(F)\) (for instance \(B\) simply connected). There is a spectral sequence with

\[ E^2_{p,q}=H_p\big(B;H_q(F)\big)\ \Longrightarrow\ H_{p+q}(E), \qquad d^r:E^r_{p,q}\to E^r_{p-r,\,q+r-1}. \]

In cohomology with coefficients in a ring, \(E_2^{p,q}=H^p(B;H^q(F))\Rightarrow H^{p+q}(E)\), with \(d_r\) of bidegree \((r,1-r)\); the spectral sequence is multiplicative and each \(d_r\) is a derivation.

Proof idea. Filter the singular chains of \(E\) by how far they reach over skeleta of \(B\), or, as Serre did, by cubical chains whose projection to \(B\) has low dimension in the first coordinates. The associated graded is computed by the homology of the fibres, which are all homotopy equivalent when \(B\) is path-connected. The \(\pi_1\) hypothesis makes the local coefficient system \(H_q(F)\) constant.

The loop space of a sphere

Take \(\Omega S^n\to PS^n\to S^n\) with \(n\ge2\). The base has homology only in degrees \(0\) and \(n\), so \(E^2_{p,q}\) is nonzero only in the columns \(p=0\) and \(p=n\), where it equals \(H_q(\Omega S^n)\). The only possible differential is \(d^n:E^n_{n,q}\to E^n_{0,q+n-1}\). Since \(PS^n\) is contractible, everything except \(E_{0,0}\) must die, so every \(d^n\) is an isomorphism. Starting from \(H_0=\mathbb Z\) this gives

\[ H_q(\Omega S^n)\cong\begin{cases}\mathbb Z, & (n-1)\mid q,\\ 0, & \text{otherwise.}\end{cases} \]

The hero picture at the top of the page shows the case \(n=3\).

Exercise 4.1Use the cohomology spectral sequence of the Hopf fibration \(S^1\to S^{2n+1}\to\mathbb{CP}^n\) to show \(H^*(\mathbb{CP}^n;\mathbb Z)\cong\mathbb Z[x]/(x^{n+1})\) with \(\deg x=2\). You may assume \(\mathbb{CP}^n\) is simply connected.

Show solution
Here \(E_2^{p,q}=H^p(\mathbb{CP}^n)\otimes H^q(S^1)\), nonzero only for \(q=0,1\), so the only differential is \(d_2:E_2^{p,1}\to E_2^{p+2,0}\). The total space has cohomology only in degrees \(0\) and \(2n+1\). In degree 1, \(E_2^{1,0}=H^1(\mathbb{CP}^n)=0\) since the space is simply connected, and \(E_2^{0,1}=\mathbb Z\) must be killed, so \(d_2:E_2^{0,1}\to E_2^{2,0}=H^2\) is injective and its cokernel must vanish: \(H^2=\mathbb Z x\) with \(x=d_2(y)\), \(y\) the generator of \(H^1(S^1)\). By the derivation property \(d_2(x^k y)=x^{k+1}\). Inductively, for \(2k+2\le 2n\), the groups \(H^{2k+2}\) must be generated by \(x^{k+1}\) and odd groups vanish. Above dimension \(2n\) the base has no cohomology, so \(x^{n+1}=0\), and \(x^ny\) survives to give \(H^{2n+1}(S^{2n+1})\).

Exercise 4.2Let \(F\to E\to B\) satisfy the hypotheses of the theorem, with \(B\) and \(F\) finite complexes. Using field coefficients, show \(\chi(E)=\chi(B)\chi(F)\).

Show solution
Over a field, \(E^2_{p,q}=H_p(B)\otimes H_q(F)\), so \(\sum(-1)^{p+q}\dim E^2_{p,q}=\chi(B)\chi(F)\). Each differential has total degree \(-1\), so passing from \(E^r\) to its homology \(E^{r+1}\) preserves the alternating sum (the Euler characteristic of a finite complex equals that of its homology). Finitely many pages suffice, and \(E^\infty\) is the associated graded of \(H_*(E)\), whose alternating sum is \(\chi(E)\).

Exercise 4.3Using the result above with field coefficients \(\mathbb Q\), compute the Poincaré series \(\sum_q \dim H_q(\Omega S^4;\mathbb Q)\,t^q\).

Show solution
\(H_q(\Omega S^4)=\mathbb Z\) for \(q\) divisible by 3 and 0 otherwise, so the series is \(1+t^3+t^6+\cdots=1/(1-t^3)\).
Lesson 05

Homotopy groups of spheres

For the general reader. The homotopy group \(\pi_i(S^n)\) counts the essentially different ways to wrap an \(i\)-dimensional sphere around an \(n\)-dimensional one. Before Serre only scattered values were known. He proved that, apart from two families of exceptions, all these groups are finite, and he found where their prime factors first appear.

Goals
  • Understand Serre classes and the Hurewicz theorem modulo a class.
  • State and sketch the finiteness theorem.
  • State the theorem on first \(p\)-torsion and check it against known groups.

Classes of abelian groups

A Serre class \(\mathcal C\) is a family of abelian groups closed under subgroups, quotients and extensions. Examples: the zero group alone; finite groups; finite groups of order prime to \(p\); finitely generated groups. A homomorphism is a \(\mathcal C\)-isomorphism if its kernel and cokernel lie in \(\mathcal C\). Serre’s idea was to do homotopy theory “modulo \(\mathcal C\)”: to ignore, for example, all finite groups, or all torsion prime to \(p\).

Theorem (Hurewicz modulo \(\mathcal C\), Serre 1953)

Let \(X\) be simply connected and \(\mathcal C\) a Serre class satisfying mild closure conditions (for instance finite groups, or \(p'\)-groups). If \(\pi_i(X)\in\mathcal C\) for \(1<i<n\), then \(H_i(X)\in\mathcal C\) for \(0<i<n\) and the Hurewicz map \(\pi_n(X)\to H_n(X)\) is a \(\mathcal C\)-isomorphism.

Theorem (Serre, 1951–1953)

For \(n\ge1\), the group \(\pi_i(S^n)\) is finite for all \(i\ne n\), with one exception: when \(n\) is even, \(\pi_{2n-1}(S^n)\cong\mathbb Z\oplus(\text{finite})\).

Proof sketch. Work modulo finite groups, that is, rationally. For \(n\) odd, the Serre spectral sequence of the fibrations \(K(\mathbb Z,m-1)\to P\to K(\mathbb Z,m)\) shows by induction that \(H^*(K(\mathbb Z,n);\mathbb Q)\) is an exterior algebra on a class of degree \(n\). Hence the map \(S^n\to K(\mathbb Z,n)\) representing a generator of \(H^n\) is an isomorphism in rational homology. Its homotopy fibre therefore has finite homology in every degree, and the Hurewicz theorem modulo finite groups makes its homotopy groups finite; the long exact sequence then gives \(\pi_i(S^n)\) finite for \(i\neq n\). For \(n\) even, \(H^*(K(\mathbb Z,n);\mathbb Q)\) is a polynomial ring, and one compares \(S^n\) with the total space of a fibration over \(K(\mathbb Z,n)\) that kills the square of the generator; this produces the extra \(\mathbb Z\) in degree \(2n-1\), detected by the Whitehead product \([\iota_n,\iota_n]\).

Theorem (first \(p\)-torsion, Serre 1953)

Let \(p\) be a prime and \(n\ge3\). Then \(\pi_{n+k}(S^n)\) has no \(p\)-torsion for \(0<k<2p-3\), and its \(p\)-primary part is \(\mathbb Z/p\) for \(k=2p-3\).

The proof uses the mod \(p\) cohomology of Eilenberg–MacLane spaces, which Serre computed for \(p=2\) in terms of Steenrod squares; Cartan completed the odd primes. That computation introduced the admissible sequences now used to describe the Steenrod algebra.

Exercise 5.1Use the Hopf fibration \(S^1\to S^3\to S^2\) to show \(\pi_i(S^2)\cong\pi_i(S^3)\) for \(i\ge3\). Check that the result agrees with the finiteness theorem for \(n=2\).

Show solution
The long exact sequence contains \(\pi_i(S^1)\to\pi_i(S^3)\to\pi_i(S^2)\to\pi_{i-1}(S^1)\). Since \(\pi_j(S^1)=0\) for \(j\ge2\), the middle map is an isomorphism for \(i\ge3\). Then \(\pi_3(S^2)\cong\pi_3(S^3)=\mathbb Z\): this is the exceptional \(\mathbb Z\) in degree \(2n-1=3\). For \(i\ge4\), \(\pi_i(S^3)\) is finite because 3 is odd, so \(\pi_i(S^2)\) is finite too.

Exercise 5.2Predict the first appearance of 2-, 3- and 5-torsion in \(\pi_{n+k}(S^n)\) for large \(n\), and check against the stable groups \(\pi_1^s=\mathbb Z/2\), \(\pi_2^s=\mathbb Z/2\), \(\pi_3^s=\mathbb Z/24\), \(\pi_4^s=\pi_5^s=0\), \(\pi_6^s=\mathbb Z/2\), \(\pi_7^s=\mathbb Z/240\).

Show solution
\(2p-3\) gives \(k=1,3,7\) for \(p=2,3,5\). Indeed \(\pi_1^s=\mathbb Z/2\) is the first 2-torsion; the first group divisible by 3 is \(\pi_3^s=\mathbb Z/24=\mathbb Z/8\oplus\mathbb Z/3\); and the first divisible by 5 is \(\pi_7^s=\mathbb Z/240=\mathbb Z/16\oplus\mathbb Z/3\oplus\mathbb Z/5\). In each case the \(p\)-part at the first appearance is exactly \(\mathbb Z/p\).

Exercise 5.3Show that \(\mathcal C_p\), the class of finite abelian groups of order prime to \(p\), is a Serre class.

Show solution
Subgroups and quotients of a finite group of order prime to \(p\) are finite with order dividing the original order. For an extension \(0\to A\to B\to C\to0\), \(|B|=|A||C|\), which is prime to \(p\) when both factors are.
Lesson 06

Coherent sheaves and duality

For the general reader. In 1955 Serre showed that the sheaf methods built for complex manifolds work for algebraic varieties over any field, using the coarse Zariski topology. The paper, known as FAC, made cohomology the basic language of algebraic geometry and set the stage for Grothendieck’s schemes.

Goals
  • Know the definition of a coherent sheaf and the cohomology of projective space.
  • State Serre’s vanishing and finiteness theorems and Serre duality.
  • Derive Riemann–Roch consequences for curves.

FAC

On a variety \(X\) with structure sheaf \(\mathcal O_X\), a sheaf of \(\mathcal O_X\)-modules is coherent if it is locally the cokernel of a map \(\mathcal O_X^m\to\mathcal O_X^n\). Serre defined cohomology through Čech cochains for the Zariski topology, proved that affine varieties have no higher cohomology for coherent sheaves, and computed projective space. On \(\mathbb P^r\) over a field \(k\), with \(\mathcal O(n)\) the twisting sheaf:

\[ H^0(\mathbb P^r,\mathcal O(n))=k[x_0,\dots,x_r]_n,\qquad H^r(\mathbb P^r,\mathcal O(n))\cong H^0(\mathbb P^r,\mathcal O(-n-r-1))^\vee, \]

and \(H^i(\mathbb P^r,\mathcal O(n))=0\) for \(0<i<r\).

Theorem (Serre, FAC 1955)

Let \(X\subseteq\mathbb P^r_k\) be a closed subvariety and \(\mathcal F\) a coherent sheaf on \(X\). Then:

  1. each \(H^i(X,\mathcal F)\) is a finite-dimensional \(k\)-vector space, and it vanishes for \(i>\dim X\);
  2. there is \(n_0\) such that for \(n\ge n_0\), \(\mathcal F(n)\) is generated by its global sections and \(H^i(X,\mathcal F(n))=0\) for all \(i>0\).
Serre duality (1955)

Let \(X\) be a smooth projective variety of dimension \(n\) over a field \(k\), with canonical sheaf \(\omega_X=\Omega^n_X\). For every locally free sheaf \(\mathcal E\) there is a natural perfect pairing

\[ H^i(X,\mathcal E)\times H^{n-i}(X,\mathcal E^\vee\otimes\omega_X)\longrightarrow H^n(X,\omega_X)\cong k. \]

Serre proved duality first for compact complex manifolds, using Dolbeault cohomology and the theory of distributions, and gave the algebraic version in FAC’s sequel. Grothendieck later extended it to proper morphisms. For a curve of genus \(g\) and a line bundle \(L\) of degree \(d\), duality turns the Riemann–Roch formula into \(h^0(L)-h^0(\omega\otimes L^{-1})=d+1-g\).

Two further results from these years are standard. Serre’s criterion (1957): a Noetherian scheme \(X\) is affine if and only if \(H^1(X,\mathcal I)=0\) for every coherent sheaf of ideals \(\mathcal I\). And at the end of FAC Serre asked whether every finitely generated projective module over \(k[x_1,\dots,x_n]\) is free. Daniel Quillen and Andrei Suslin proved independently in 1976 that it is.

Exercise 6.1Use Serre duality on \(\mathbb P^1\), where \(\omega=\mathcal O(-2)\), to compute \(h^1(\mathbb P^1,\mathcal O(n))\) for all \(n\).

Show solution
\(h^1(\mathcal O(n))=h^0(\mathcal O(-n)\otimes\mathcal O(-2))=h^0(\mathcal O(-n-2))\), which is \(-n-1\) for \(n\le-2\) and 0 otherwise. For example \(h^1(\mathcal O(-3))=2\).

Exercise 6.2Let \(C\subset\mathbb P^2\) be a smooth plane curve of degree \(d\). From the exact sequence \(0\to\mathcal O(-d)\to\mathcal O_{\mathbb P^2}\to\mathcal O_C\to0\) and \(\chi(\mathcal O_{\mathbb P^2}(m))=\tfrac{(m+1)(m+2)}{2}\), derive the genus formula \(g=\tfrac{(d-1)(d-2)}{2}\).

Show solution
\(\chi\) is additive, so \(\chi(\mathcal O_C)=\chi(\mathcal O)-\chi(\mathcal O(-d))=1-\tfrac{(1-d)(2-d)}{2}=1-\tfrac{(d-1)(d-2)}{2}\). For a connected curve \(\chi(\mathcal O_C)=h^0-h^1=1-g\), so \(g=\tfrac{(d-1)(d-2)}{2}\).

Exercise 6.3Combine Riemann–Roch \(\chi(L)=\deg L+1-g\) with duality to show \(\deg\omega_C=2g-2\) and \(h^0(\omega_C)=g\).

Show solution
Duality with \(L=\mathcal O\) gives \(h^0(\omega)=h^1(\mathcal O)=g\) and \(h^1(\omega)=h^0(\mathcal O)=1\). So \(\chi(\omega)=g-1\). Riemann–Roch gives \(\chi(\omega)=\deg\omega+1-g\), hence \(\deg\omega=2g-2\).
Lesson 07

GAGA

For the general reader. A complex projective variety can be studied with polynomials or with holomorphic functions. In 1956 Serre proved that, for compact projective varieties, the two approaches give exactly the same answers. The title of his paper, Géométrie algébrique et géométrie analytique, abbreviated GAGA, became the name of the principle.

Goals
  • State the GAGA comparison theorems.
  • Deduce Chow’s theorem.
  • See why projectivity, or at least properness, is essential.

Let \(X\) be a complex projective variety and \(X^{\mathrm{an}}\) the associated complex analytic space. Each algebraic coherent sheaf \(\mathcal F\) on \(X\) gives an analytic coherent sheaf \(\mathcal F^{\mathrm{an}}=\mathcal F\otimes_{\mathcal O_X}\mathcal O_{X^{\mathrm{an}}}\).

Theorem (Serre, GAGA 1956)

Let \(X\) be a projective variety over \(\mathbb C\).

  1. For every coherent algebraic sheaf \(\mathcal F\), the natural maps \(H^i(X,\mathcal F)\to H^i(X^{\mathrm{an}},\mathcal F^{\mathrm{an}})\) are isomorphisms for all \(i\).
  2. \(\mathcal F\mapsto\mathcal F^{\mathrm{an}}\) is an equivalence between the categories of coherent algebraic and coherent analytic sheaves on \(X\).

Proof idea. For \(X=\mathbb P^r\) and \(\mathcal F=\mathcal O(n)\), both sides can be computed directly; the analytic computation uses Cartan’s results on Stein spaces. Every coherent sheaf on \(\mathbb P^r\) has a resolution by sums of \(\mathcal O(n)\), by FAC, and a five-lemma argument extends part 1 to all coherent sheaves. For part 2 one uses Cartan’s Theorem A analogue on \(\mathbb P^r\): every coherent analytic sheaf becomes globally generated after twisting, so it is a cokernel of a map between sums of \(\mathcal O(n)^{\mathrm{an}}\), and such maps are algebraic by part 1.

Corollary (Chow’s theorem, 1949)

Every closed analytic subset of \(\mathbb P^r(\mathbb C)\) is algebraic.

GAGA is the reason that Hodge theory, a theory about harmonic forms on Kähler manifolds, says something about algebraic varieties. It was generalized to proper schemes by Grothendieck, and its philosophy, that analytic objects over a compact algebraic base are algebraic, recurs in rigid-analytic geometry and in the theory of algebraic stacks.

Exercise 7.1Show that every holomorphic line bundle on \(\mathbb P^n(\mathbb C)\) is isomorphic to some \(\mathcal O(k)\). You may use that the algebraic Picard group of \(\mathbb P^n\) is \(\mathbb Z\), generated by \(\mathcal O(1)\).

Show solution
A holomorphic line bundle is an invertible coherent analytic sheaf. By GAGA part 2 it is \(\mathcal L^{\mathrm{an}}\) for a coherent algebraic sheaf \(\mathcal L\), and the equivalence preserves the property of being invertible (since \(\mathcal L\otimes\mathcal L^\vee\to\mathcal O\) is an isomorphism iff its analytification is). So \(\mathcal L\cong\mathcal O(k)\) algebraically, hence analytically.

Exercise 7.2The function \(e^z\) on \(\mathbb C\) is holomorphic but not a polynomial. Explain why this does not contradict GAGA, and show that every meromorphic function on \(\mathbb P^1(\mathbb C)\) is rational.

Show solution
\(\mathbb A^1\) is not projective, and GAGA needs compactness; \(e^z\) has an essential singularity at \(\infty\), so it does not extend meromorphically to \(\mathbb P^1\). A meromorphic function \(f\) on \(\mathbb P^1\) has finitely many poles \(a_i\in\mathbb C\) (and possibly \(\infty\)). Multiplying by \(\prod(z-a_i)^{m_i}\) gives an entire function with at worst a pole at \(\infty\), which by Liouville’s theorem is a polynomial. So \(f\) is rational.
Lesson 08

Local fields and Galois cohomology

For the general reader. Around 1959 Serre turned to number theory. His books Corps locaux (1962) and Cohomologie galoisienne (1964) recast local class field theory and the arithmetic of algebraic groups in the language of group cohomology. They are still the standard references, and the questions he posed in them still guide research.

Goals
  • Define Galois cohomology and cohomological dimension.
  • Use Hilbert 90 and Kummer theory.
  • State Serre’s Conjectures I and II.

Definitions

Let \(K\) be a field with separable closure \(K_s\) and absolute Galois group \(G_K=\mathrm{Gal}(K_s/K)\), a profinite group. For a discrete \(G_K\)-module \(A\), the Galois cohomology groups are \(H^i(K,A)=H^i(G_K,A)\), computed with continuous cochains. For a non-abelian group \(G\) defined over \(K\), the pointed set \(H^1(K,G)\) classifies \(K\)-forms of objects with automorphism group \(G\), and torsors under \(G\).

Hilbert’s Theorem 90 and Kummer theory

\(H^1(K,K_s^\times)=0\), and more generally \(H^1(K,\mathrm{GL}_n)=\{1\}\). If \(n\) is prime to the characteristic, the exact sequence \(1\to\mu_n\to K_s^\times\xrightarrow{\,n\,}K_s^\times\to1\) gives

\[ H^1(K,\mu_n)\cong K^\times/K^{\times n},\qquad H^2(K,\mu_n)\cong\mathrm{Br}(K)[n]. \]

The cohomological dimension \(\mathrm{cd}_p(K)\) is the least \(d\) such that \(H^i(K,A)=0\) for all \(i>d\) and all finite \(p\)-primary \(A\). Finite fields have dimension 1; by Tate’s theorems, \(p\)-adic fields and totally imaginary number fields have dimension 2.

Conjecture I (Serre, 1962; theorem of Steinberg, 1965)

If \(K\) is perfect with \(\mathrm{cd}(K)\le1\) and \(G\) is a connected linear algebraic group over \(K\), then \(H^1(K,G)=\{1\}\).

Conjecture II (Serre, 1962)

If \(K\) is perfect with \(\mathrm{cd}(K)\le2\) and \(G\) is a semisimple, simply connected algebraic group over \(K\), then \(H^1(K,G)=\{1\}\).

Conjecture II is known for many groups, including the classical groups and the case \(G=\mathrm{SL}_1(D)\) through the Merkurjev–Suslin theorem, and for number fields its analogue is the Hasse principle of Kneser, Harder and Chernousov. It remains open in general, with the groups of type \(E_8\) the hardest case. The book also introduced Serre’s view of cohomological invariants, which he and others developed in later decades.

Exercise 8.1Using Kummer theory, count the quadratic extensions of \(\mathbb Q_p\) for odd \(p\) and for \(p=2\). You may use \(\mathbb Q_p^\times\cong\mathbb Z\times\mathbb Z_p^\times\), with \(\mathbb Z_p^\times/\mathbb Z_p^{\times2}\) of order 2 for odd \(p\) and 4 for \(p=2\).

Show solution
Quadratic extensions correspond to subgroups of index 2 in \(G_K\), equivalently to nonzero elements of \(H^1(K,\mu_2)=K^\times/K^{\times2}\): the class of \(a\) gives \(K(\sqrt a)\). For odd \(p\), \(|\mathbb Q_p^\times/\mathbb Q_p^{\times2}|=2\cdot2=4\), giving 3 quadratic extensions. For \(p=2\) the group has order \(2\cdot4=8\), giving 7.

Exercise 8.2Let \(K=\mathbb F_q\). Show that \(\mathrm{Br}(K)=0\), and explain how this agrees with Wedderburn’s theorem that finite division rings are commutative.

Show solution
\(G_K\cong\hat{\mathbb Z}\), which has cohomological dimension 1, and \(\bar K^\times\) is a torsion module (every element is a root of unity), so \(H^2(G_K,\bar K^\times)=0\). So \(\mathrm{Br}(K)=H^2(K,\bar K^\times)=0\). A non-commutative finite division ring with centre \(K\) would give a nonzero Brauer class, so none exists.
Lesson 09

Trees and amalgams

For the general reader. A tree is a graph with no cycles. In his 1977 book Arbres, amalgames, SL\(_2\), Serre showed that a group acting on a tree can be read off from the pieces of the action: stabilizers of vertices and edges, glued along the quotient graph. The theory, completed with Hyman Bass, is now a basic tool of geometric group theory.

Goals
  • State the structure theorem for groups acting on trees.
  • Derive the Nielsen–Schreier theorem and the decomposition of \(\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb Z)\).
  • Meet the tree of \(\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb Q_p)\).
Theorem (Serre)

Let a group \(G\) act on a tree \(T\) without inverting edges.

  1. If the action is free, \(G\) is a free group.
  2. If the quotient \(G\backslash T\) is a single edge with vertices \(P,Q\) and edge \(e\) lifting to an edge of \(T\), then \(G\cong G_P*_{G_e}G_Q\), the amalgamated free product of the stabilizers.
  3. Conversely, every amalgam \(A*_C B\) acts on a tree with quotient an edge and stabilizers \(A,B,C\).

Bass extended part 2 to arbitrary quotient graphs: \(G\) is the fundamental group of a graph of groups. As a corollary, every subgroup of a free group acts freely on the same tree, so it is free (Nielsen–Schreier).

Two examples

\(\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb Z)\) acts on a tree embedded in the upper half-plane, with quotient an edge, and so

\[ \mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb Z)\cong\mathbb Z/4 *_{\mathbb Z/2}\mathbb Z/6. \]

For a prime \(p\), the vertices of the Bruhat–Tits tree of \(\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb Q_p)\) are homothety classes of \(\mathbb Z_p\)-lattices in \(\mathbb Q_p^2\); each vertex has \(p+1\) neighbours. From this action Serre recovered Ihara’s theorem that every torsion-free discrete subgroup of \(\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb Q_p)\) is free, and the decomposition \(\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb Z[1/p])\cong\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb Z)*_{\Gamma_0(p)}\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb Z)\).

Serre also defined Euler characteristics for groups with torsion-free subgroups of finite index, by \(\chi(G)=\chi(H)/[G:H]\). For an amalgam of finite groups, \(\chi(A*_CB)=\tfrac1{|A|}+\tfrac1{|B|}-\tfrac1{|C|}\).

Exercise 9.1Compute the abelianization of \(\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb Z)\) from the amalgam.

Show solution
The abelianization of \(A*_CB\) is \((A^{ab}\oplus B^{ab})/\langle(c,-c)\rangle\). Here it is \((\mathbb Z/4\oplus\mathbb Z/6)/\langle(2,3)\rangle\), of order \(24/2=12\). The class of \((1,1)\) has order 12: \(6(1,1)=(2,0)\) and \(4(1,1)=(0,4)\) are not in \(\{0,(2,3)\}\). So the abelianization is \(\mathbb Z/12\).

Exercise 9.2Show \(\chi(\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb Z))=-\tfrac1{12}\). Deduce that a torsion-free subgroup of index \(m\) is free of rank \(1+\tfrac m{12}\), and check this for the principal congruence subgroup \(\Gamma(3)\), of index 24.

Show solution
\(\chi=\tfrac14+\tfrac16-\tfrac12=-\tfrac1{12}\). A torsion-free subgroup \(H\) of finite index acts freely on the tree, so it is free, of some rank \(r\), with \(\chi(H)=1-r\). Then \(1-r=-\tfrac m{12}\). For \(\Gamma(3)\), \(r=1+2=3\). The value \(-\tfrac1{12}=\zeta(-1)\) is no accident; Serre’s 1971 work on cohomology of arithmetic groups relates such Euler characteristics to zeta values.
Lesson 10

Galois representations and modularity

For the general reader. The symmetries of the points of finite order on an elliptic curve form a representation of the Galois group of the rational numbers. Serre proved that, for curves without extra symmetry, this representation is as large as it can be. He then conjectured a precise rule saying which two-dimensional representations come from modular forms. That conjecture, made in 1987, connected Fermat’s Last Theorem to modular forms and was proved in full in 2009.

Goals
  • State the open image theorem.
  • State Serre’s modularity conjecture with its level and weight.
  • Follow the path from the Frey curve to Fermat.

The open image theorem

Let \(E\) be an elliptic curve over a number field \(K\). For a prime \(\ell\), the Galois group acts on the \(\ell\)-power torsion points, giving \(\rho_{E,\ell^\infty}:G_K\to\mathrm{GL}_2(\mathbb Z_\ell)\), and on the \(\ell\)-torsion, giving \(\bar\rho_{E,\ell}:G_K\to\mathrm{GL}_2(\mathbb F_\ell)\).

Theorem (Serre, 1972)

If \(E\) does not have complex multiplication, the image of \(G_K\to\prod_\ell\mathrm{GL}_2(\mathbb Z_\ell)\) is open. In particular \(\bar\rho_{E,\ell}\) is surjective for all but finitely many \(\ell\).

The proof combines the Chebotarev density theorem, the classification of subgroups of \(\mathrm{GL}_2(\mathbb F_\ell)\), Raynaud’s results on finite flat group schemes, and the theory of abelian \(\ell\)-adic representations that Serre developed in his 1968 book. Serre asked whether, over \(\mathbb Q\), the bound on exceptional \(\ell\) can be made uniform in \(E\). This uniformity question is still open.

The modularity conjecture

A continuous representation \(\bar\rho:G_{\mathbb Q}\to\mathrm{GL}_2(\bar{\mathbb F}_p)\) is odd if \(\det\bar\rho(c)=-1\) for complex conjugation \(c\). It is modular if it is the reduction of the representation attached to a Hecke eigenform.

Conjecture (Serre, 1987; theorem of Khare–Wintenberger, 2009)

Every continuous, odd, irreducible \(\bar\rho:G_{\mathbb Q}\to\mathrm{GL}_2(\bar{\mathbb F}_p)\) is modular. In the strong form, it arises from an eigenform of level \(N(\bar\rho)\), the prime-to-\(p\) Artin conductor, and weight \(k(\bar\rho)\), an explicit recipe in terms of the restriction of \(\bar\rho\) to inertia at \(p\).

The strong form already had a striking consequence in 1987. Gerhard Frey had suggested that a solution \(a^p+b^p=c^p\) gives an elliptic curve \(y^2=x(x-a^p)(x+b^p)\) with strange properties. Serre isolated the precise statement needed, the “epsilon conjecture” that the level can be lowered. Kenneth Ribet proved it in 1986, so that Fermat’s Last Theorem followed from the modularity of semistable elliptic curves. Andrew Wiles, with Richard Taylor, proved that in 1994. The weak form implies the strong form by work of Ribet and others, and Khare and Wintenberger, using Mark Kisin’s modularity lifting theorems, proved the full conjecture.

Exercise 10.1Let \(E/\mathbb Q\) be an elliptic curve. Using the Weil pairing, show \(\det\bar\rho_{E,\ell}\) is the mod \(\ell\) cyclotomic character, and conclude that \(\bar\rho_{E,\ell}\) is odd and \(\det\bar\rho_{E,\ell}\) is surjective onto \(\mathbb F_\ell^\times\).

Show solution
The Weil pairing \(e_\ell:E[\ell]\times E[\ell]\to\mu_\ell\) is bilinear, alternating, non-degenerate and Galois equivariant, so \(e_\ell(\sigma P,\sigma Q)=e_\ell(P,Q)^{\det\bar\rho(\sigma)}=\sigma(e_\ell(P,Q))=e_\ell(P,Q)^{\chi_\ell(\sigma)}\). Hence \(\det\bar\rho=\chi_\ell\). Complex conjugation inverts roots of unity, so \(\chi_\ell(c)=-1\). Since \(\mathrm{Gal}(\mathbb Q(\mu_\ell)/\mathbb Q)\cong\mathbb F_\ell^\times\), \(\chi_\ell\) is surjective.

Exercise 10.2Suppose \(a^p+b^p=c^p\) with \(p\ge5\) prime, \(abc\ne0\), \(a,b,c\) coprime, \(a\equiv-1\pmod4\) and \(b\) even. The Frey curve has minimal discriminant \(2^{-8}(abc)^{2p}\) and is semistable. Granting that \(\bar\rho_{E,p}\) is irreducible, unramified outside \(2p\), and has Serre weight 2 and conductor \(N(\bar\rho)=2\), explain the contradiction.

Show solution
At an odd prime \(q\mid abc\) the curve has multiplicative reduction and \(q\)-adic valuation of the discriminant divisible by \(p\), so by Tate curve theory \(\bar\rho\) is unramified at \(q\ne p\). By modularity of \(E\) and Ribet’s level lowering, \(\bar\rho\) comes from a weight-2 newform of level 2. But \(X_0(2)\) has genus 0, so \(S_2(\Gamma_0(2))=0\). There is no such form, a contradiction.

Exercise 10.3Why does the open image theorem fail for curves with complex multiplication? Take \(E:y^2=x^3-x\), with the extra endomorphism \((x,y)\mapsto(-x,iy)\).

Show solution
Over \(K=\mathbb Q(i)\) the Galois action commutes with the endomorphism ring \(\mathbb Z[i]\), so the image of \(G_K\) in \(\mathrm{GL}_2(\mathbb Z_\ell)\) lies in the units of \(\mathbb Z[i]\otimes\mathbb Z_\ell\), a commutative group of dimension 2 as an \(\ell\)-adic Lie group. \(\mathrm{GL}_2(\mathbb Z_\ell)\) has dimension 4, so the image cannot be open.
Part III · Life and legacy
Lesson 11

The Collège de France, 1956–1994

In 1956, at the age of 29, Serre was elected to the chair of Algebra and Geometry at the Collège de France. The post carries one obligation: to lecture each year on new research. For 38 years he used his courses to work out subjects he was learning or creating, and many of them became books: local fields, Galois cohomology, Lie algebras and Lie groups, abelian \(\ell\)-adic representations, trees, the Mordell–Weil theorem, and rational points of curves over finite fields. He retired in 1994 and became honorary professor.

His correspondence shaped the period as much as his papers. The letters with Alexander Grothendieck, mostly from 1955 to 1970 and published in 2001, record the building of modern algebraic geometry: Serre suggests, objects, finds references, and corrects. In 1958 his notion of locally isotrivial fibre spaces led Grothendieck towards the étale topology. In 1960 Serre proved a Kähler analogue of the Weil conjectures, which pointed the way to Pierre Deligne’s proof of the Riemann hypothesis over finite fields in 1974. His letters with John Tate, published in 2015, follow number theory across half a century.

He collaborated with Armand Borel on the Borel–Serre compactification of locally symmetric spaces (1973), with Deligne on modular forms of weight one (1974), with Hyman Bass on trees, and with Tate on good reduction of abelian varieties (1968). He spent many terms at the Institute for Advanced Study and at Harvard. His doctoral students include Michel Broué, Jean-Marc Fontaine and Pierre Gabriel, but his influence on students passed mostly through courses, books and letters.

His later research continued in number theory and group theory: the distribution of eigenvalues of Hecke operators, the number of points of curves over finite fields, finite subgroups of Lie groups, and the arithmetic of algebraic groups.

DiscussionPick one of his short books and one paper, and compare how they present the same idea. What does the book gain from being written after the research?

Lesson 12

Honours, books and legacy

Serre’s honours span seven decades. After the Fields Medal (1954) came the Prix Peccot-Vimont of the Collège de France (1955), the Prix Gaston Julia (1970), the Émile Picard Medal of the Académie des Sciences (1971), Foreign Membership of the Royal Society (1974), the Balzan Prize (1985), the CNRS Gold Medal (1987), the Steele Prize for Mathematical Exposition (1995) and the Wolf Prize (2000). In 2003 the Norwegian Academy awarded him the first Abel Prize, citing his key role in giving modern form to topology, algebraic geometry and number theory. He was elected to the Académie des Sciences in 1977 and to academies in the Netherlands, the United States, Sweden, Russia and Norway, among others. He holds the Grand Cross of both the Légion d’honneur and the Ordre national du Mérite.

His collected papers, the Œuvres, run to five volumes, the last published in June 2026 and covering work through 2025. In September 2026 the Collège de France and the Institut Henri Poincaré held a two-day conference to mark his 100th birthday, and he took part remotely with a mathematical lecture.

Legacy

  • Topology: the Serre spectral sequence, Serre classes and localization at a prime are the working tools of homotopy theory.
  • Algebraic geometry: FAC and GAGA made cohomology of coherent sheaves the language of the subject and prepared the ground for Grothendieck.
  • Number theory: Galois cohomology, the open image theorem and the modularity conjecture are central to the Langlands programme and to the proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem.
  • Exposition: A Course in Arithmetic, Linear Representations of Finite Groups, Local Fields and Trees remain standard textbooks, noted for brevity and precision.

Final projectChoose one result from Part II. Write a two-page account for a strong undergraduate that states it, works one example in full, and explains which earlier idea Serre transplanted from another field to prove it.

Reference

Sources and further reading

Biography

  1. J. J. O’Connor and E. F. Robertson, Jean-Pierre Serre, MacTutor History of Mathematics.
  2. Jean-Pierre Serre, Wikipedia.
  3. Collège de France, Jean-Pierre Serre, Algebra and Geometry chair (1956–1994).
  4. Collège de France, Conference for the 100th birthday of Jean-Pierre Serre, 2026.
  5. VnExpress International, Youngest-ever Fields Medal winner Jean-Pierre Serre turns 100, September 2026.
  6. P. Colmez and J.-P. Serre (eds.), Grothendieck–Serre Correspondence, AMS and SMF, 2004.
  7. P. Colmez and J.-P. Serre (eds.), Correspondance Serre–Tate, SMF, 2015.

Mathematics

  1. J.-P. Serre, Homologie singulière des espaces fibrés. Applications, Ann. of Math. 54 (1951).
  2. J.-P. Serre, Groupes d’homotopie et classes de groupes abéliens, Ann. of Math. 58 (1953).
  3. J.-P. Serre, Faisceaux algébriques cohérents, Ann. of Math. 61 (1955).
  4. J.-P. Serre, Un théorème de dualité, Comment. Math. Helv. 29 (1955).
  5. J.-P. Serre, Géométrie algébrique et géométrie analytique, Ann. Inst. Fourier 6 (1956).
  6. J.-P. Serre, Local Fields, Galois Cohomology, Trees, A Course in Arithmetic, Abelian \(\ell\)-adic Representations and Elliptic Curves, Springer and Benjamin.
  7. J.-P. Serre, Propriétés galoisiennes des points d’ordre fini des courbes elliptiques, Invent. Math. 15 (1972).
  8. J.-P. Serre, Sur les représentations modulaires de degré 2 de \(\mathrm{Gal}(\bar{\mathbb Q}/\mathbb Q)\), Duke Math. J. 54 (1987).
  9. C. Khare and J.-P. Wintenberger, Serre’s modularity conjecture (I), (II), Invent. Math. 178 (2009).
  10. J. McCleary, A User’s Guide to Spectral Sequences, Cambridge, 2001.
  11. R. Hartshorne, Algebraic Geometry, Springer, 1977, chapter III and appendix B.