Part V

Clinical Phenotypes

From the first attack (CIS) through relapsing-remitting disease, the transition to secondary progression, and the primary progressive form — the Lublin 2014 framework, the modern PIRA concept, and the differential against NMOSD and MOGAD.

1. The Clinical Continuum of MS

Modern MS is best understood as a single biological process expressed along a continuum of clinical states. The historical splitting of cases into discrete «courses» remains useful for prognosis, communication and trial design, but does not correspond to fundamentally distinct diseases.

~85%

Onset as RRMS

Relapsing-remitting; majority transition over decades to SPMS.

~10%

Onset as PPMS

Primary progressive; gradual disability without distinct relapses.

~5%

Other / variant

Aggressive MS, paediatric, late-onset, tumefactive.

2. Clinically Isolated Syndrome (CIS)

A first clinical episode of CNS demyelination, lasting >24 h, in the absence of fever or infection, in someone not previously known to have MS. CIS is the prototypical «single-attack» presentation; with appropriate MRI and CSF support it now often is diagnostic of MS under McDonald 2017.

  • Conversion to MS by 10 years: ~80% if any T2 lesion on baseline MRI; ~20% if MRI normal (Fisniku et al., Brain 2008).
  • CHAMPS (Jacobs et al., NEJM 2000) and ETOMS (Comi et al., Lancet 2001) trials demonstrated that early IFN-β reduces conversion to clinically definite MS by ~40%.
  • Modern practice: treat CIS with high MRI burden as MS at diagnosis.

3. Radiologically Isolated Syndrome (RIS)

MRI lesions meeting MS dissemination-in-space criteria, found incidentally in someone with no clinical history of demyelinating events. ~30% convert to a clinical first event within 5 years; risk is higher with infratentorial or spinal-cord lesions, gadolinium-enhancing lesions, or positive CSF OCBs.

RIS is not yet formally MS (McDonald 2017), but two recent randomised trials (TERIS with teriflunomide, ARISE with dimethyl fumarate; Lebrun-Frenay et al., JAMA Neurol 2023; Okuda et al., Ann Neurol 2023) showed early DMT delays first clinical event — raising the prospect of treating MS before symptom onset.

4. Relapsing-Remitting MS (RRMS)

The commonest course at onset. Defined by clearly delineated relapses with full or partial recovery, separated by clinical stability. Classical features:

  • Relapse — new neurological symptoms or worsening of previous symptoms, lasting >24 h, in the absence of fever or infection (a «true» relapse); pseudo-relapses (Uhthoff phenomenon, infection-driven worsening) must be distinguished.
  • Annualised relapse rate (ARR) — modern untreated cohorts ~0.4–0.6; on placebo arms of pivotal trials ~0.3–0.4 (a falling secular trend).
  • Recovery — ~85% of relapses recover >75% of deficit within 12 weeks; partial residual is the rule with longer disease duration.
  • Activity — relapses + new MRI lesions defines «active» disease in Lublin terminology.

In the pre-DMT era, ~60% of RRMS patients transitioned to SPMS within 20 years; modern long-term registries suggest this fraction is now substantially lower, particularly in patients started early on high-efficacy DMTs (Brown et al., JAMA 2019; Spelman et al., Neurology 2021).

5. Secondary Progressive MS (SPMS)

SPMS is a phase of gradual, irreversible disability accumulation following an initial RRMS course, with or without superimposed relapses or MRI activity. Diagnosis is retrospective: at least 6–12 months of progression, independent of any relapse, in a previously RRMS patient.

  • Median time RRMS → SPMS — ~20 years (untreated, London-Ontario cohort); shorter in older-onset patients.
  • Pathology — axonal loss, cortical demyelination, meningeal B-cell follicles, slow expansion of chronic active (paramagnetic-rim) lesions.
  • DMT efficacy — modest. Siponimod showed a 21% relative reduction in 3-month confirmed disability progression in EXPAND (Kappos et al., Lancet 2018), driven mostly by «active» SPMS.

Modern terminology distinguishes active (relapses or new MRI lesions) versus not-active, and with progression versus without progression, giving four SPMS subtypes that determine eligibility for specific DMTs.

6. Primary Progressive MS (PPMS)

~10–15% of MS cases. Progressive disability accumulation from onset, without preceding relapses. Characteristic features:

  • Older onset — mean age ~40, vs ~30 for RRMS.
  • Sex ratio — closer to 1:1.
  • Typical syndrome — progressive spastic paraparesis with bladder dysfunction, secondary to spinal-cord predominant disease (the «chronic progressive myelopathy» presentation).
  • MRI — fewer cerebral T2 lesions than RRMS; cord atrophy prominent.
  • CSF — OCBs in ~85–90% (slightly less than RRMS).

ORATORIO (Montalban et al., NEJM 2017) was the first to demonstrate DMT efficacy in PPMS: ocrelizumab reduced 12-week confirmed disability progression by 24% over 120 weeks; the effect was greatest in younger patients with gadolinium-enhancing lesions, suggesting that anti-CD20 works in PPMS via the same mechanism it works in RRMS — suppression of inflammatory activity.

7. The Lublin/Reingold/Kappos 2014 Phenotype Framework

The 2014 revision of MS clinical phenotypes (Lublin et al., Neurology 2014) replaced the older 1996 classification (which included «progressive-relapsing MS») with a two-axis description:

CourseActivity (relapse / new MRI)Progression (independent of relapse)
Relapsing-remittingActive / Not activeNot progressing
Secondary progressiveActive / Not activeWith / Without progression
Primary progressiveActive / Not activeWith / Without progression
Clinically isolated syndromeActive / Not activen/a

The framework abandons «progressive-relapsing MS» and unifies progressive courses (primary & secondary) by their shared activity/progression axes. It is now the basis of regulatory labelling in major jurisdictions.

HLA-DRB1*15:01 — the dominant MS-susceptibility allele (PDB 1IEA)

Crystal structure of HLA-DR2 (DRA1*0101 / DRB1*15:01) presenting MBP85-99 (Smith et al., J Exp Med 1998). DRB1*15:01 carries a single-copy odds ratio of ~3 for MS; homozygotes ~6 (additive on the log scale). The structural picture explains how a single class-II groove can generate a quantitatively dominant susceptibility signal across the entire MS phenotype spectrum.

Drag to rotate · scroll to zoom · right-drag to pan. Powered by 3Dmol.js (Rego & Koes 2014).

8. PIRA — Progression Independent of Relapse Activity

Modern long-term registries have shown that, even in apparently RRMS patients with very few relapses, a slow accumulation of confirmed disability occurs between relapses. This phenomenon — PIRA — has transformed thinking about progression:

  • Kappos et al., JAMA Neurol 2020: pooled OPERA-I/II analysis — ~80% of confirmed disability accumulation in RRMS was independent of relapses.
  • Implication: progression is not exclusive to SPMS; it is a continuous process underlying RRMS, masked by relapse-driven recovery.
  • Mechanism: chronic compartmentalised inflammation, paramagnetic-rim lesions, cortical pathology, slow neurodegeneration.
  • Therapeutic target: BTK inhibitors are designed primarily for PIRA / smouldering disease.

9. Paediatric, Late-Onset & Aggressive MS

  • Paediatric MS — ~3–5% of cases. Almost always RRMS; relapses ~2–3× more frequent than in adults; cognitive impact disproportionate.
  • Late-onset MS (> 50 yr) — ~5%. Higher proportion of PPMS; less responsive to DMT; more comorbidity; differential against vascular small-vessel disease and CADASIL.
  • Aggressive MS — rapid disability accrual (≥ EDSS 4 within 5 years). Definition heterogeneous. Trial-based criteria from the European MS Platform inform treatment escalation. Increasingly treated with high-efficacy DMTs from the outset (induction strategy) or autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (AHSCT, MIST trial).
  • Tumefactive MS — large (> 2 cm) lesions with mass effect, ring enhancement, sometimes mimicking glioma. May respond dramatically to corticosteroids; biopsy reveals demyelinating, not neoplastic, pathology.
  • Marburg variant — rare, fulminant, often fatal subacute demyelination.
  • Balo’s concentric sclerosis — concentric rings of demyelination on MRI; pathologically MS, often aggressive.

10. The Differentials — NMOSD & MOGAD

Two distinct demyelinating diseases were carved out of «MS» in the modern era and must be excluded before MS is diagnosed:

FeatureMSNMOSD (AQP4-IgG)MOGAD (MOG-IgG)
AntibodyNone pathogenicAnti-AQP4Anti-MOG
Optic neuritisUnilateral, mild-moderateSevere, often bilateral, posteriorBilateral, with optic-disc swelling
MyelitisShort (< 2 segments), partial, dorsalLongitudinally extensive (≥ 3 segments), centralLongitudinally extensive often
CSF OCBs>95%~20%~10%
DMT responseStandard MS DMTs workWorsened by some MS DMTs (IFN-β, fingolimod, natalizumab); treated with eculizumab, satralizumab, inebilizumab, rituximabSteroids, IVIG, rituximab; some MS DMTs may worsen

Misdiagnosis of NMOSD or MOGAD as MS exposes patients to ineffective and sometimes harmful therapy. Modern practice is to test AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG (cell-based assays) at presentation in any «MS-like» optic-neuritis or myelitis with atypical features.

Key references for further reading. Lublin et al., Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: 2013 revisions, Neurology 2014; Kappos et al., Contribution of relapse-independent progression to disability accrual, JAMA Neurol 2020; Montalban et al., Ocrelizumab vs placebo in PPMS (ORATORIO), NEJM 2017; Wingerchuk et al., NMOSD diagnostic criteria, Neurology 2015; Banwell et al., MOGAD diagnostic criteria, Lancet Neurol 2023.
Share:XRedditLinkedIn