Molecular Orbital Theory
From atomic orbitals to molecular wavefunctions — the LCAO-MO framework, Hückel theory, bond order analysis, Walsh diagrams, and computational applications
2.1 Introduction: MO Theory vs Valence Bond Theory
Molecular orbital (MO) theory and valence bond (VB) theory represent two complementary frameworks for understanding chemical bonding. While VB theory, pioneered by Heitler and London in 1927, describes bonds as arising from the overlap of localized atomic orbitals on individual atoms, MO theory takes a fundamentally different approach: electrons are delocalized over the entire molecule, occupying molecular orbitals that extend across all nuclei.
In VB theory, the wavefunction for H$_2$ is constructed by placing one electron on each atom and forming a singlet spin pairing. The VB wavefunction takes the form:
Heitler–London valence bond wavefunction for H$_2$
In contrast, MO theory first constructs molecular orbitals as linear combinations of atomic orbitals (LCAO), then fills these orbitals with electrons according to the aufbau principle, Pauli exclusion, and Hund's rules. Each electron moves in the average field of all nuclei and other electrons. The MO wavefunction for H$_2$ is:
Molecular orbital wavefunction with both electrons in the bonding orbital
where $\sigma_g = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2(1+S)}}(\phi_A + \phi_B)$ is the bonding molecular orbital. The key advantage of MO theory is its natural treatment of delocalization: electrons are not restricted to localized bonds but can spread over the entire molecular framework. This makes MO theory particularly powerful for describing conjugated systems, metallic bonding, and molecules where VB theory requires many resonance structures.
Key Distinction: VB theory naturally explains bond localization and is intuitive for simple molecules, while MO theory naturally explains delocalization, paramagnetism (e.g., O$_2$), and spectroscopic properties. Both theories, when taken to their complete forms (configuration interaction for MO, generalized VB), converge to the same exact answer.
The triumph of MO theory includes its correct prediction of the paramagnetism of O$_2$ (which VB theory in its simplest form fails to predict), its straightforward extension to polyatomic molecules through symmetry-adapted linear combinations, and its natural connection to computational methods such as Hartree–Fock and density functional theory.
2.2 Derivation: LCAO-MO for H$_2^+$
The simplest molecular system is the hydrogen molecular ion H$_2^+$, which has two protons and one electron. This one-electron problem can be solved exactly in confocal elliptic coordinates, but the LCAO approach provides essential physical insight and generalizes to polyatomic systems. We approximate the molecular orbital as a linear combination of 1s atomic orbitals centered on each proton:
LCAO trial wavefunction for H$_2^+$
where $\phi_A$ and $\phi_B$ are hydrogen 1s orbitals centered on nuclei A and B respectively. We apply the variational principle: minimize the energy expectation value with respect to the coefficients $c_1$ and $c_2$:
Here we define the fundamental integrals. The overlap integral measures the spatial overlap between atomic orbitals on different centers:
Overlap integral — ranges from 0 (no overlap) to 1 (identical orbitals)
The Coulomb integral represents the energy of an electron in orbital $\phi_A$ interacting with both nuclei:
Coulomb integral — energy of an electron localized on atom A
The resonance integral (or exchange integral) captures the stabilization from electron delocalization between the two centers:
Resonance integral — responsible for covalent bond formation
By symmetry, $H_{AA} = H_{BB}$ and $S_{AA} = S_{BB} = 1$. Minimizing $E$ with respect to $c_1$ and $c_2$ (setting $\partial E/\partial c_1 = 0$ and$\partial E/\partial c_2 = 0$) yields the secular equations:
Secular equations in matrix form
For non-trivial solutions ($c_1, c_2 \neq 0$), the secular determinant must vanish:
Expanding this determinant:
Taking square roots and solving for $E$ gives the bonding and antibonding energies:
Bonding ($E_+$) and antibonding ($E_-$) orbital energies
The bonding orbital $E_+$ corresponds to $c_1 = c_2$ (in-phase combination), giving:
Bonding MO — constructive interference, enhanced electron density between nuclei
The antibonding orbital $E_-$ corresponds to $c_1 = -c_2$ (out-of-phase combination), giving:
Antibonding MO — destructive interference, nodal plane between nuclei
Physical Insight: Since $H_{AB}$ is negative (stabilizing) and $S_{AB} > 0$, the antibonding orbital is raised in energy more than the bonding orbital is lowered. This asymmetry means that filling both bonding and antibonding orbitals yields a net repulsion — explaining why He$_2$does not form a stable covalent bond.
2.3 Derivation: Hückel Theory for π Systems
Hückel molecular orbital (HMO) theory is a remarkably effective simplification of the LCAO-MO method for conjugated π systems. Erich Hückel introduced three key approximations in 1931 that make the secular determinant analytically tractable:
Hückel Approximations
- ●All Coulomb integrals are equal: $H_{ii} = \alpha$ for every carbon p$_z$ orbital
- ●Resonance integrals between adjacent atoms: $H_{ij} = \beta$ if atoms $i$ and $j$ are bonded, 0 otherwise
- ●Overlap integrals: $S_{ij} = \delta_{ij}$ (unit overlap matrix)
The parameter $\alpha$ is the energy of an electron in an isolated carbon 2p$_z$ orbital (negative, typically around $-11.4$ eV), and $\beta$ is the resonance integral between adjacent p$_z$ orbitals (negative, typically around $-3.0$ eV). With the substitution$x = (\alpha - E)/\beta$, the secular determinant simplifies considerably.
Butadiene (CH$_2$=CH–CH=CH$_2$)
For butadiene, a linear chain of four carbon atoms, the Hückel secular determinant with $x = (\alpha - E)/\beta$ is:
Hückel secular determinant for butadiene
Expanding this determinant by cofactors along the first row:
This is a quadratic in $x^2$. Solving with the quadratic formula:
Since $E = \alpha - x\beta$ and $\beta < 0$, the four π MO energies in order of increasing energy are:
Hückel orbital energies for butadiene (recall $\beta < 0$, so $E_1$ is lowest)
The four π electrons fill $E_1$ and $E_2$. The total π-electron energy is:
For two isolated ethylene double bonds, $E_\pi = 4\alpha + 4\beta$. The delocalization energy is:
Delocalization energy of butadiene — stabilization from conjugation
Benzene (C$_6$H$_6$)
For benzene, the cyclic topology introduces additional symmetry. The $6 \times 6$ Hückel secular determinant for a cyclic system can be solved using the general formula for cyclic polyenes. With $N = 6$ atoms in a ring, the eigenvalues are:
General Hückel eigenvalues for cyclic polyenes
For benzene ($N = 6$), this yields:
Benzene MO energies — note the doubly degenerate pairs
With six π electrons filling the three lowest levels ($E_1$ and the degenerate pair $E_{2,3}$):
Three isolated ethylene bonds would give $E_\pi = 6\alpha + 6\beta$. The delocalization energy is:
Resonance stabilization energy of benzene — the origin of aromatic stability
Hückel's Rule: The cyclic polyene energy formula shows why $4n+2$ π-electron systems are aromatic (all bonding orbitals filled, large delocalization energy) while $4n$ systems are antiaromatic (degenerate half-filled orbitals, small or zero delocalization energy). This is the quantum mechanical basis of Hückel's rule.
2.4 Derivation: MO Diagrams and Bond Order
The bond order provides a quantitative measure of the net bonding character in a molecule. It is defined as:
where $n_b$ = number of electrons in bonding orbitals, $n_a$ = number in antibonding orbitals
This definition follows from the fact that each pair of electrons in a bonding orbital contributes one unit of bond strength, while each pair in an antibonding orbital removes one unit. To apply this formula to homonuclear diatomics, we need the MO energy level ordering.
For second-row homonuclear diatomics, the molecular orbitals formed from 2s and 2p atomic orbitals are (in approximate order of increasing energy):
Standard MO ordering for O$_2$, F$_2$, Ne$_2$
For the lighter diatomics (Li$_2$ through N$_2$), s-p mixing reverses the ordering of$\sigma_{2p}$ and $\pi_{2p}$:
Modified MO ordering for B$_2$, C$_2$, N$_2$ (with s-p mixing)
Application to Key Diatomics
| Molecule | Electron Configuration | $n_b$ | $n_a$ | Bond Order | Magnetic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N$_2$ (14 e$^-$) | $(\sigma_{2s})^2(\sigma_{2s}^*)^2(\pi_{2p})^4(\sigma_{2p})^2$ | 8 | 2 | 3 | Diamagnetic |
| O$_2$ (16 e$^-$) | $(\sigma_{2s})^2(\sigma_{2s}^*)^2(\sigma_{2p})^2(\pi_{2p})^4(\pi_{2p}^*)^2$ | 8 | 4 | 2 | Paramagnetic |
| F$_2$ (18 e$^-$) | $(\sigma_{2s})^2(\sigma_{2s}^*)^2(\sigma_{2p})^2(\pi_{2p})^4(\pi_{2p}^*)^4$ | 8 | 6 | 1 | Diamagnetic |
Paramagnetism of O$_2$
The paramagnetism of oxygen was one of the great early triumphs of MO theory. In O$_2$, the$\pi_{2p}^*$ level is doubly degenerate. By Hund's rule, the two electrons in this level occupy separate degenerate orbitals with parallel spins, giving a triplet ground state ($^3\Sigma_g^-$) with two unpaired electrons:
Hund's rule filling of degenerate antibonding orbitals in O$_2$
Historical Significance: Simple VB theory predicts O$_2$ to be diamagnetic (O=O with all electrons paired). The experimental observation of paramagnetism by Faraday in 1848 remained unexplained until Mulliken and Hund developed MO theory in the late 1920s. This correct prediction was a decisive factor in the acceptance of MO theory.
2.5 Derivation: Walsh Diagrams for AH$_2$ Molecules
Walsh diagrams, introduced by A. D. Walsh in 1953, show how molecular orbital energies vary continuously with molecular geometry. For AH$_2$ molecules (e.g., H$_2$O, BeH$_2$), the key geometric parameter is the H–A–H bond angle $\theta$, which ranges from 90° to 180°.
At 180° (linear geometry, D$_{\infty h}$ symmetry), the molecular orbitals are classified by the irreducible representations of this point group. As the molecule bends to C$_{2v}$ symmetry, the orbital energies and symmetry labels change. The key orbital energy correlations are:
Orbital energy correlation for AH$_2$ linear-to-bent transition
The critical orbital is the $1\pi_u$ orbital, which is non-bonding in the linear geometry. Upon bending, one component ($3a_1$) gains s-orbital character through mixing and is strongly stabilized, while the other ($1b_1$) remains non-bonding. The energy change of the $3a_1$ orbital as a function of bond angle can be derived from the overlap between the central atom's s and p orbitals with the hydrogen s orbitals:
Approximate energy of the $3a_1$ orbital as a function of bond angle
Why H$_2$O is Bent
Water has 8 valence electrons occupying the $1a_1$, $1b_2$, $2a_1$, and$3a_1$/$1b_1$ levels. The $3a_1$ orbital is occupied and is strongly stabilized upon bending. The net energy change upon bending from 180° to the equilibrium angle is:
The strong stabilization of $3a_1$ outweighs the destabilization of $1b_2$
The large stabilization of the occupied $3a_1$ orbital upon bending more than compensates for the slight destabilization of $1b_2$, driving H$_2$O to a bent geometry with$\theta = 104.5°$.
Why BeH$_2$ is Linear
BeH$_2$ has only 4 valence electrons, filling $1a_1$ and $1b_2$ (or equivalently,$1\sigma_g$ and $1\sigma_u$ in the linear geometry). Crucially, the $3a_1$ orbital is empty:
Since the $3a_1$ orbital is unoccupied, there is no stabilization from bending. The slight destabilization of $1b_2$ upon bending, combined with the loss of the favorable linear$1\sigma_u$ orbital, means that BeH$_2$ prefers the linear 180° geometry.
Walsh's Rule: An AH$_2$ molecule will be bent if there are electrons to occupy the $3a_1$ orbital, which is strongly stabilized upon bending. Molecules with 5–8 valence electrons (NH$_2$, H$_2$O, H$_2$S) are bent, while those with 4 valence electrons (BeH$_2$, BH$_2^+$) are linear. This provides a powerful predictive tool for molecular geometry.
2.6 Applications of MO Theory
Computational Chemistry
MO theory is the foundation of virtually all modern computational chemistry methods. The Hartree–Fock method constructs molecular orbitals as self-consistent solutions to the one-electron Fock equations. Post-Hartree–Fock methods (configuration interaction, coupled cluster, Møller–Plesset perturbation theory) and density functional theory all build upon the MO framework. The LCAO-MO approach naturally leads to the Roothaan–Hall equations, which cast the Hartree–Fock problem as a matrix eigenvalue problem solvable by standard linear algebra:
Roothaan–Hall equations: the matrix form of Hartree–Fock theory
Conjugated Polymers and Organic Electronics
The Hückel model, extended to long conjugated chains, predicts that the π orbital energies form a band structure as $N \to \infty$. The bandwidth is $4|\beta|$, and the HOMO–LUMO gap decreases as $1/N$. This explains the optical properties of conjugated polymers like polyacetylene, polythiophene, and poly(p-phenylene vinylene), which are used in organic LEDs, solar cells, and field-effect transistors. The band gap of polyacetylene is approximately $2|\beta|\sin(\pi/N)$, which for large $N$ approaches zero — predicting metallic behavior, as confirmed experimentally by Shirakawa, MacDiarmid, and Heeger (Nobel Prize, 2000).
MO Theory in Spectroscopy
Electronic transitions observed in UV-Vis spectroscopy correspond to promotions of electrons between molecular orbitals. The absorption wavelength is determined by the MO energy gap. For conjugated systems, Hückel theory predicts the HOMO–LUMO gap:
HOMO–LUMO gap for linear conjugated polyenes with $N$ carbon atoms
This explains the bathochromic shift (red shift) observed with increasing conjugation length: as the chain grows, the energy gap decreases and absorption moves to longer wavelengths. Carotenoids, for example, absorb blue light and appear orange/yellow because their extended conjugation produces a HOMO–LUMO gap in the visible range.
Aromatic Stability
The remarkable stability of aromatic compounds is quantitatively explained by MO theory. The Hückel delocalization energy for benzene ($2\beta \approx 150$ kJ/mol) accounts for the experimentally observed thermodynamic stability relative to cyclohexatriene. The$4n+2$ rule emerges naturally: for a cyclic system with $4n+2$ π electrons, all bonding orbitals (including doubly degenerate pairs) are completely filled, leading to a closed-shell configuration with maximum delocalization energy.
2.7 Historical Development
The development of molecular orbital theory stands as one of the great intellectual achievements of twentieth-century chemistry. Its history involves several key figures whose contributions built upon one another over the course of two decades.
Friedrich Hund (1896–1997)
Hund developed the first molecular orbital descriptions of diatomic molecules in 1926–1928, introducing the concept of bonding and antibonding orbitals. His work on molecular symmetry and the correlation of atomic and molecular energy levels laid the foundation for the entire field. Hund's rules for atomic electron configurations carry his name, and his molecular orbital correlation diagrams remain essential tools.
Robert S. Mulliken (1896–1986)
Mulliken systematized MO theory in a series of landmark papers from 1928 to 1935, developing the notation for molecular orbital symmetry labels ($\sigma_g$, $\pi_u$, etc.) and applying MO theory to predict electronic spectra of diatomics. He received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1966 “for his fundamental work concerning chemical bonds and the electronic structure of molecules by the molecular orbital method.”
John Lennard-Jones (1894–1954)
Lennard-Jones made MO theory quantitative in 1929 by applying it to diatomic molecules with the LCAO approximation. He demonstrated that the MO approach could predict molecular properties such as bond energies and equilibrium distances. His 1929 paper on the electronic structure of diatomic molecules is considered the foundation of modern computational quantum chemistry.
Erich Hückel (1896–1980)
Hückel's 1931 simplification of MO theory for π systems revolutionized organic chemistry. His theory provided the first quantum mechanical explanation of aromaticity and the $4n+2$ rule. Despite initial resistance from the organic chemistry community, Hückel theory became one of the most widely applied quantum chemical methods, remaining in use nearly a century later.
Clemens C. J. Roothaan (1918–2019)
Roothaan's 1951 paper transformed Hartree–Fock theory from an abstract set of integro-differential equations into a computationally tractable matrix eigenvalue problem. By expanding molecular orbitals in a basis set of atomic orbitals, Roothaan derived the equations $\mathbf{FC} = \mathbf{SC}\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}$ that form the starting point of all modern ab initio electronic structure calculations. George Hall independently derived the same equations, and they are often called the Roothaan–Hall equations.
2.8 Interactive Simulations
Hückel Theory: π Orbital Energies and Coefficients for Benzene, Naphthalene, and Butadiene
PythonClick Run to execute the Python code
Code will be executed with Python 3 on the server
Bond Orders and Delocalization Energies for Conjugated Molecules
FortranClick Run to execute the Fortran code
Code will be compiled with gfortran and executed on the server