Near-Degeneracy and Fine Structure
Quasi-degenerate perturbation theory, relativistic corrections, and spin-orbit coupling
Real physical systems often exhibit near-degeneracy rather than exact degeneracy. We also examine the hydrogen fine structure as a masterful application combining degenerate perturbation theory with relativistic and spin-orbit corrections.
Near-Degenerate Perturbation Theory
When two levels are not exactly degenerate but have a small energy gap compared to the perturbation, non-degenerate perturbation theory gives poor results. Consider two levels with:
The solution is quasi-degenerate perturbation theory: treat the near-degenerate subspace exactly (like degenerate PT) and the rest perturbatively. The effective $2 \times 2$ matrix becomes:
where $W_{ij} = \langle i|\hat{H}'|j\rangle$. The eigenvalues are:
This reduces to the degenerate result when $E_1^{(0)} = E_2^{(0)}$ and to the non-degenerate result when $|E_1^{(0)} - E_2^{(0)}| \gg |W_{12}|$. It smoothly interpolates between the two limits.
Avoided Level Crossings
A beautiful consequence of near-degenerate perturbation theory is the avoided crossing (also called anti-crossing). If we tune a parameter that would make two levels cross in the absence of coupling ($W_{12} = 0$), the off-diagonal coupling $W_{12} \neq 0$ prevents the levels from actually crossing:
This is a manifestation of the von Neumann-Wigner no-crossing theorem: for a generic Hermitian matrix depending on a single real parameter, eigenvalues do not cross. Crossings require special symmetry (e.g., different symmetry quantum numbers).
Hydrogen Fine Structure
The hydrogen fine structure consists of two perturbative corrections to the non-relativistic Hamiltonian, both arising from relativistic effects at order $(v/c)^2$:
Relativistic Kinetic Energy Correction
The relativistic energy-momentum relation $E = \sqrt{p^2c^2 + m^2c^4}$, expanded to next order beyond the non-relativistic kinetic energy, gives:
The first-order energy correction is (using $\hat{p}^2 = 2m_e(\hat{H}_0 - \hat{V})$ to avoid computing $\langle p^4\rangle$ directly):
Using the expectation values $\langle 1/r\rangle = 1/(n^2 a_0)$ and $\langle 1/r^2\rangle = 1/(n^3(l+1/2)a_0^2)$:
Spin-Orbit Coupling
The electron's magnetic moment interacts with the magnetic field produced by the nucleus (in the electron's rest frame). After the Thomas precession correction:
To evaluate $\langle\hat{\vec{S}}\cdot\hat{\vec{L}}\rangle$, use the total angular momentum $\hat{\vec{J}} = \hat{\vec{L}} + \hat{\vec{S}}$:
The first-order correction (for $l \neq 0$):
Combined Fine Structure Result
Remarkably, when the relativistic and spin-orbit corrections are combined, the result depends only on $n$ and $j$ (not on $l$ separately):
where $\alpha = e^2/(4\pi\epsilon_0\hbar c) \approx 1/137$ is the fine structure constant. The fine structure corrections are smaller than the Bohr energies by a factor of $\alpha^2 \approx 5.3 \times 10^{-5}$.
Key consequence: States with the same $n$ and $j$ but different $l$ remain degenerate. For example, the $2S_{1/2}$ ($l=0, j=1/2$) and $2P_{1/2}$ ($l=1, j=1/2$) states have the same fine structure energy.
The Lamb Shift
The residual degeneracy between $2S_{1/2}$ and $2P_{1/2}$ predicted by the Dirac equation is actually broken by quantum electrodynamic (QED) effects. The Lamb shift, measured by Willis Lamb in 1947, showed:
This tiny splitting arises from:
- Vacuum fluctuations: The electron interacts with virtual photons of the quantum electromagnetic field
- Self-energy: The electron's interaction with its own field
- Vertex correction: QED corrections to the electron-photon coupling
The Lamb shift was one of the key experimental results that motivated the development of renormalized quantum electrodynamics by Feynman, Schwinger, and Tomonaga.
Key Concepts Summary
- Degeneracy problem: Non-degenerate PT fails when $E_n^{(0)} = E_m^{(0)}$ (vanishing denominators)
- W-matrix: $W_{\alpha\beta} = \langle n^{(0)},\alpha|\hat{H}'|n^{(0)},\beta\rangle$ within the degenerate subspace
- Secular equation: $\det(W - E^{(1)}\mathbf{I}) = 0$ gives first-order energy corrections
- Good basis: Eigenvectors of $W$ define the correct zeroth-order states
- Selection rules: Symmetry ($\Delta m = 0, \Delta l = \pm 1$) reduces the $W$-matrix dramatically
- Linear Stark effect: $\Delta E = \pm 3e\mathcal{E}_0 a_0$ for hydrogen $n=2$ (linear in field)
- Near-degeneracy: Treat the near-degenerate subspace exactly; interpolates between degenerate and non-degenerate limits
- Avoided crossings: Coupled levels repel; minimum gap $= 2|W_{12}|$
- Relativistic correction: $\hat{H}'_{\text{rel}} = -\hat{p}^4/(8m_e^3c^2)$
- Spin-orbit coupling: $\hat{H}'_{\text{SO}} \propto \hat{\vec{S}}\cdot\hat{\vec{L}}/r^3$
- Fine structure: Combined result depends on $n$ and $j$ only, with corrections of order $\alpha^2$
- Lamb shift: QED effect breaking the $2S_{1/2}$/$2P_{1/2}$ degeneracy (~1057 MHz)
Related Topics: Non-Degenerate PT - The foundation upon which degenerate theory builds | Variational Method - Alternative approach that works without small parameters | Time-Dependent PT - For transitions between states