Chapter 11.1: General ASEP with Langmuir Kinetics
Beyond TASEP: Two-Way Hopping and Bulk Reactions
The TASEP is a special case of the Asymmetric Simple Exclusion Process (ASEP), which allows hopping in both directions. Moreover, on real roads, vehicles enter and exit not just at boundaries but also along the road (on-ramps, off-ramps, parking). This bulk attachment/detachment is precisely the Langmuir kinetics from Chapter 10.1. Coupling ASEP with Langmuir yields a rich model that interpolates between transport-dominated and reaction-dominated regimes.
11.1.1 The Full ASEP Master Equation
In the general ASEP, particles hop to the right with rate\(p\) and to the left with rate\(q\), subject to exclusion. The bulk update rules are:
$$10 \xrightarrow{p} 01, \qquad 01 \xrightarrow{q} 10$$
The mean-field current in the bulk is:
$$J = (p - q)\,\rho(1-\rho)$$
The effective drift velocity is \(v_{\text{eff}} = p - q\). When \(q = 0\), this reduces to the TASEP. When \(p = q\), we get the Symmetric Simple Exclusion Process (SSEP) with zero net current.
General Boundary Conditions
The most general open boundary conditions involve four parameters:
- α: Injection rate at the left boundary (\(0 \to 1\) at site 1)
- γ: Extraction rate at the left boundary (\(1 \to 0\) at site 1)
- δ: Injection rate at the right boundary (\(0 \to 1\) at site L)
- β: Extraction rate at the right boundary (\(1 \to 0\) at site L)
In traffic terms: \(\alpha\) is the main on-ramp entrance rate, \(\beta\) is the main off-ramp exit rate, \(\delta\) represents vehicles entering from a merging road at the end, and \(\gamma\) represents vehicles making U-turns near the beginning.
The boundary densities imposed by the left and right reservoirs are:
$$\rho_L = \frac{\alpha}{\alpha + \gamma}, \qquad \rho_R = \frac{\delta}{\delta + \beta}$$
11.1.2 Langmuir Coupling: Bulk Attachment and Detachment
In addition to boundary-driven transport, we now allow particles to attach to and detach from the lattice at every site in the bulk:
$$0 \xrightarrow{\omega_A} 1 \quad \text{(attachment)}, \qquad 1 \xrightarrow{\omega_D} 0 \quad \text{(detachment)}$$
These are exactly the Langmuir adsorption/desorption processes from Chapter 10.1. In traffic, they represent vehicles entering from side streets (attachment) or exiting to side streets (detachment).
The Competition Parameter
The crucial insight is the scaling of the Langmuir rates with system size. For a lattice of \(L\) sites, the total Langmuir contribution scales as \(\omega L\)(summed over all bulk sites), while the boundary contribution is\(O(1)\). For both mechanisms to compete, we set:
$$\omega_A = \frac{\Omega_A}{L}, \qquad \omega_D = \frac{\Omega_D}{L}$$
The dimensionless competition parameter \(\Omega = (\Omega_A + \Omega_D)\) controls the relative importance of bulk kinetics versus boundary-driven transport:
- \(\Omega \ll 1\): Transport-dominated — boundary conditions control the density profile (TASEP-like behavior)
- \(\Omega \gg 1\): Reaction-dominated — Langmuir kinetics control the bulk density toward the equilibrium\(\rho_{\text{eq}} = \Omega_A / (\Omega_A + \Omega_D)\)
- \(\Omega \sim 1\): Both mechanisms compete — new phases emerge
Mean-Field Equation
The continuum mean-field equation for the ASEP+Langmuir system is:
$$\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} + (p-q)\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\bigl[\rho(1-\rho)\bigr] = \Omega_A(1-\rho) - \Omega_D \rho$$
The left side is the ASEP conservation law; the right side is the Langmuir source/sink. In steady state, the density profile satisfies the ODE:
$$(p-q)(1-2\rho)\frac{d\rho}{dx} = \Omega_A(1-\rho) - \Omega_D \rho$$
11.1.3 The Langmuir Equilibrium Density
Setting the Langmuir source term to zero gives the bulk equilibrium density:
$$\rho_{\text{eq}} = \frac{\Omega_A}{\Omega_A + \Omega_D} = \frac{K}{1 + K}$$
where \(K = \Omega_A / \Omega_D\) is the Langmuir equilibrium constant. This is a fixed point of the bulk dynamics, attracting the local density. When transport is weak, the entire bulk converges to\(\rho_{\text{eq}}\) regardless of boundary conditions.
The competition between boundary-imposed densities and the Langmuir equilibrium density creates the rich phase structure we will explore in the next chapter. The key question is: what happens when \(\rho_L \neq \rho_{\text{eq}} \neq \rho_R\)? The answer is a five-phase diagram with domain wall localisation.
11.1.4 Simulation: ASEP + Langmuir
We simulate the general ASEP with Langmuir kinetics using a continuous-time Monte Carlo algorithm and compare transport-dominated versus reaction-dominated regimes.
ASEP + Langmuir: Transport vs Reaction Regimes
PythonClick Run to execute the Python code
Code will be executed with Python 3 on the server
11.1.5 Transport-Dominated vs Reaction-Dominated
The steady-state ODE can be solved by separation of variables. Defining\(\xi = x/L\) (rescaled position on\([0,1]\)):
$$(1-2\rho)\frac{d\rho}{d\xi} = \Omega_A(1-\rho) - \Omega_D \rho$$
This has a fixed point at \(\rho = \rho_{\text{eq}}\). The flow direction depends on whether\(\rho > \rho_{\text{eq}}\) or\(\rho < \rho_{\text{eq}}\):
When \(\rho < 1/2\): The factor \((1-2\rho) > 0\), so\(d\rho/d\xi > 0\) when\(\rho < \rho_{\text{eq}}\) (density increases rightward toward equilibrium).
When \(\rho > 1/2\): The factor \((1-2\rho) < 0\), so the flow reverses. This creates the possibility of matching LD and HD solutions through a shock.
Mean-Field ODE: Transport vs Reaction Regimes
PythonClick Run to execute the Python code
Code will be executed with Python 3 on the server
Key Takeaways
- The general ASEP allows bidirectional hopping with rates\(p\) (forward) and\(q\) (backward), giving current\(J = (p-q)\rho(1-\rho)\).
- Langmuir kinetics (attachment \(\omega_A\), detachment \(\omega_D\)) model bulk on/off-ramps.
- The scaling \(\omega \sim 1/L\) ensures competition between boundary transport and bulk reactions.
- The parameter \(\Omega = (\Omega_A + \Omega_D)L\) controls the crossover from TASEP-like to Langmuir-like behavior.
- The Langmuir equilibrium density \(\rho_{\text{eq}} = \Omega_A/(\Omega_A + \Omega_D)\) acts as a bulk attractor, competing with boundary-imposed densities.