Module 7
Computational Psychiatry
Bayesian-brain failure modes map onto psychiatric symptom dimensions. Aberrant precision on priors is proposed to underlie hallucinations and delusions in schizophrenia; elevated sensory precision underlies autistic hypersensitivity; and altered reward prediction errors underlie depression and addiction. Computational psychiatry formalises these mappings as testable parameter shifts.
1. Schizophrenia — Weak Priors
Adams 2013 proposed that schizophrenia involves attenuated precision on high-level priors. The consequence: ambiguous sensory data are over-weighted, producing hallucinations (endogenous sensory generation) and delusions (aberrant inference about causes). The diagnostic hollow-mask illusion — normally perceived as convex despite contrary depth cues — is resistable in schizophrenia because the convex-face prior is down-weighted.
2. Autism HIPPEA
Pellicano & Burr 2012 proposed HIPPEA (High, Inflexible Precision of Prediction Errors in Autism): elevated sensory-channel precision. The consequence: reduced generalisation, sensory overload, and a preference for structured predictable environments. Evidence includes psychophysical tasks (Palmer 2017) and pupillometry (Lawson 2017). HIPPEA integrates symptom diversity (sensory, social, perceptual) under a single computational profile.
Simulation: Precision Profiles
Click Run to execute the Python code
Code will be executed with Python 3 on the server
3. Depression, Addiction, Hallucinogens
Depression is increasingly modelled as suppressed reward prediction errors and rigid, over-confident priors about failure. Addiction involves excess reward prediction error on drug-associated cues plus impaired inhibition. Psychedelics (psilocybin, LSD) are proposed to destabilise high-level priors via 5-HT2A activation, temporarily enabling “re-inference” and explaining both mystical experiences and therapeutic effects in treatment-resistant depression (Carhart-Harris 2019 REBUS model).
Key References
• Adams, R. A., Stephan, K. E., Brown, H. R., Frith, C. D. & Friston, K. J. (2013). “The computational anatomy of psychosis.” Front. Psychiatry, 4, 47.
• Pellicano, E. & Burr, D. (2012). “When the world becomes ‘too real’: a Bayesian explanation of autistic perception.” Trends Cogn. Sci., 16, 504–510.
• Carhart-Harris, R. L. & Friston, K. J. (2019). “REBUS and the anarchic brain: toward a unified model of the brain action of psychedelics.” Pharmacol. Rev., 71, 316–344.
• Stephan, K. E. et al. (2016). “Computational neuroimaging strategies for single-patient predictions.” Neuroimage, 145, 180–199.