How to use this course
Giovanni Domenico Cassini was the leading observational astronomer of the later seventeenth century. With better telescopes than anyone else, he found the rotation periods of Jupiter and Mars, four moons of Saturn and the main gap in its rings. His tables of Jupiter’s satellites made it possible to find longitude on land and led, in other hands, to the first measurement of the speed of light. He directed the Paris Observatory for four decades and founded a family that ran it for four generations. He was also a conservative in theory: he doubted the finite speed of light, preferred his own ovals to Kepler’s ellipses for a time, and believed the Earth to be elongated at the poles. This course presents the observer, the organizer and the questions on which he was wrong.
Each technical lesson opens with a paragraph for the general reader, then gives precise statements in modern notation, derivations and exercises with folded solutions. Italy and France used the Gregorian calendar throughout Cassini’s life, so all dates are Gregorian.
Timeline
| 1625 | Born 8 June at Perinaldo, in the Ligurian hills inland from Sanremo, son of Jacopo Cassini and Julia Crovesi. |
| 1644–45 | Invited to Bologna by the Marquis Cornelio Malvasia to work at his observatory at Panzano. |
| 1650 | Professor of astronomy at the University of Bologna, in the chair left vacant by Bonaventura Cavalieri. |
| 1652–53 | Observes and writes on the comet of 1652. Designs a new meridian line for the church of San Petronio. |
| 1655 | The San Petronio meridian, 66.8 m long, is completed. |
| 1657 | Advises on the dispute between Bologna and Ferrara over the waters of the Reno. |
| 1664–67 | With telescopes by Giuseppe Campani: rotation of Jupiter (1664–65), rotation of Mars (1666). |
| 1668 | Publishes tables of the motions of Jupiter’s satellites. |
| 1669 | Leaves Bologna on 25 February for Paris, recruited by Jean-Baptiste Colbert for Louis XIV’s new Academy of Sciences. |
| 1671 | The Paris Observatory opens; he directs it until his death. Discovers Iapetus. |
| 1672 | Discovers Rhea. Paris and Cayenne observations of Mars give the solar parallax. |
| 1673 | Becomes a French subject on 14 July: Jean-Dominique Cassini. |
| 1674 | Marries Geneviève de Laistre. |
| 1675 | Observes the dark gap in Saturn’s ring, now the Cassini division. |
| 1676 | 22 August: announces a new inequality in the eclipses of Jupiter’s satellites; Ole Rømer explains it by the finite speed of light. |
| 1677 | Birth of his son Jacques, later Cassini II. |
| 1679 | Presents his large map of the Moon to the Academy. |
| 1680–81 | Edmond Halley works with him in Paris on the comet of 1680. |
| 1683 | Starts the meridian survey of France south of Paris; gives an account of the zodiacal light. |
| 1684 | Discovers Tethys and Dione. |
| 1690 | Observes differential rotation in Jupiter’s atmosphere. |
| 1693 | Publishes the laws of the Moon’s rotation and new tables of Jupiter’s satellites. |
| 1695 | Travels in Italy with Jacques and restores the San Petronio meridian. |
| 1700–01 | With Jacques, extends the meridian arc south to Perpignan. |
| 1711 | Nearly blind. |
| 1712 | Dies 14 September in Paris, aged 87. |
Perinaldo and Genoa, 1625–1644
Giovanni Domenico Cassini was born on 8 June 1625 at Perinaldo, a hill village above the Ligurian coast near Sanremo. His father, Jacopo Cassini, was from Tuscany; his mother was Julia Crovesi. He was brought up largely by a maternal uncle. After two years of schooling at Vallebone he went to the Jesuit college in Genoa, and then studied at the abbey of San Fruttuoso.
He wrote Latin verse and was drawn to astronomy through astrology, which was then still a respectable learned pursuit and a source of patronage. He read widely in it, and became convinced that its predictions had no foundation. The astronomy behind the horoscopes interested him more than the horoscopes themselves. His skill at calculation brought him to the notice of wealthy patrons in Genoa, one of whom introduced him to a Bolognese senator with an observatory.
Bologna: Panzano and San Petronio, 1644–1664
The Marquis Cornelio Malvasia, a senator of Bologna and an amateur astronomer, was building an observatory at his villa at Panzano near Modena. In about 1644 he invited Cassini to work there, and from 1648 Cassini observed with instruments Malvasia had bought. In Bologna he also learned from the Jesuit astronomers Giovanni Battista Riccioli and Francesco Maria Grimaldi, who were then preparing Riccioli’s great survey of astronomy and his map of the Moon.
In 1650, with Malvasia’s support, the Senate of Bologna appointed him to the principal chair of astronomy at the university, vacant since the death of Bonaventura Cavalieri in 1647. He was twenty-five. He observed the comet of 1652 and wrote a book on it, and in 1662 published solar tables.
The sun in the church
The basilica of San Petronio had an old meridian line laid down by Egnazio Danti in the previous century, but the church had been extended and the line no longer worked. In 1653 Cassini proposed a new and much longer one, running diagonally across the nave between the columns. A small hole high in the roof let a beam of sunlight fall on a brass line set in the floor, and the position of the solar image at noon gave the Sun’s altitude with high precision. The line was completed in 1655. Cassini used it to measure the obliquity of the ecliptic, the length of the year, the effect of refraction, and above all the variation of the Sun’s apparent size through the year (Lesson 04). In 1656 he published the first results as Specimen observationum Bononiensium, dedicated to Queen Christina of Sweden.
Bologna also used him as an engineer. In 1657 he advised the Senate in its long dispute with Ferrara over the course of the river Reno, a question that Pope Alexander VII had to settle. He was later made superintendent of fortifications (1663) and of the waters of the Papal States (1665). He declined the Pope’s suggestion that he take holy orders.
Telescopes, waters and the call to Paris, 1664–1671
From 1664 Cassini had access to the long refracting telescopes of the Roman lens-maker Giuseppe Campani, the best in the world at the time. With them he followed markings on the planets long enough to measure how fast they turned. In July 1664 he began the observations of Jupiter’s spots that gave its rotation period and showed the planet’s flattening. He followed a prominent spot in 1665; credit for first seeing what may be the Great Red Spot is shared with Robert Hooke. In 1666 he found the rotation of Mars. In 1668 he published his Ephemerides Bononienses of Jupiter’s satellites, which made it possible to predict their eclipses (Lesson 06).
That work made his name in Paris. Jean-Baptiste Colbert, Louis XIV’s minister, was gathering foreign scientists for the new Académie Royale des Sciences, founded in 1666, and for an observatory being built on the southern edge of the city. Christiaan Huygens had already come from Holland. Colbert offered Cassini a large pension. Bologna and Pope Clement IX gave him leave for what all expected would be a short visit, and he left Bologna on 25 February 1669. He never returned to his chair.
In Paris he soon gained a decisive voice in the new Observatory. When it opened in 1671 he became its effective director. He took French nationality on 14 July 1673 and became Jean-Dominique Cassini. In 1674 he married Geneviève de Laistre, whose dowry included the château of Thury, the family’s country seat for generations.
A meridian line in a church
For the general reader. A hole in a high roof acts like a pinhole camera. At noon, the Sun’s image falls on the floor at a distance that depends on how high the Sun stands, and its size depends on how far away the Sun is. Cassini turned the nave of San Petronio into an instrument able to measure both, and used it to test whether Kepler was right about the orbit of the Earth.
- Relate the position and size of the noon image to the Sun’s altitude.
- Extract the obliquity of the ecliptic from solstice measurements.
- Understand the bisection of the eccentricity and how the solar diameter tests it.
Geometry of a meridiana
Let the aperture be at height \(H\) above a horizontal floor. At local noon the Sun has altitude \(h=90^\circ-\varphi+\delta\), where \(\varphi\) is the latitude and \(\delta\) the Sun’s declination. The centre of the image lies on the meridian line at distance \(D=H\cot h\) from the point vertically beneath the hole. The beam has length \(L=H/\sin h\), and a Sun of angular diameter \(\theta\) makes an image about \(L\theta\) wide across the line and \(L\theta/\sin h\) long along it.
If \(h_s\) and \(h_w\) are the noon altitudes at the summer and winter solstices, corrected for refraction and for the solar semi-diameter, then
\[ \varepsilon=\tfrac12(h_s-h_w),\qquad \varphi=90^\circ-\tfrac12(h_s+h_w). \]Since \(\delta=\pm\varepsilon\) at the solstices, adding and subtracting the two altitude formulas gives both results. The winter value is the more sensitive to refraction, which Cassini studied with the same instrument.
The bisection of the eccentricity
Ptolemy and later Copernicus described the Sun’s apparent motion by a circle whose centre is displaced from the Earth. Kepler showed that for the planets the displacement must be split: the centre of the orbit lies halfway between the Sun and the point about which motion appears uniform. For the Earth–Sun orbit this has a measurable consequence.
Let the Sun’s observed equation of centre have amplitude \(A\) radians. Under Kepler’s laws, with eccentricity \(e\), the equation of centre is \(2e\sin M+O(e^2)\) and the distance is \(r=a(1-e\cos M)+O(e^2)\). So \(e=A/2\), and the apparent diameter varies by \(\pm A/2\) in relative terms. A simple eccentric circle with uniform motion about its centre gives the same equation of centre with eccentricity \(A\), and a diameter variation of \(\pm A\).
The observed amplitude is \(A\approx1.92^\circ\approx0.0335\). Kepler predicts the Sun’s diameter changes by about \(\pm1.7\%\) over the year; the simple eccentric predicts \(\pm3.4\%\). The solar image at San Petronio is large enough to tell these apart. Cassini’s measurements came out close to the smaller value, in favour of the bisected eccentricity. It was one of the first direct observational supports for Kepler’s theory of the Earth’s orbit.
Exercise 4.1At San Petronio the aperture is 27.07 m above the floor and the latitude is \(44.49^\circ\). Take \(\varepsilon=23.44^\circ\). Find the distance of the noon image from the foot of the vertical at both solstices. Compare with the line’s length of 66.8 m.
Show solution
Exercise 4.2With the Sun’s diameter \(0.533^\circ\), how long is the noon image along the line at each solstice? What fractional change in its length corresponds to a \(\pm1.7\%\) change in the Sun’s distance?
Show solution
Exercise 4.3Prove the first-order Kepler formulas \(\nu-M\approx2e\sin M\) and \(r\approx a(1-e\cos M)\), starting from \(E-e\sin E=M\) and \(r=a(1-e\cos E)\).
Show solution
The rotation of the planets
For the general reader. Before Cassini nobody knew how long a day lasted on another planet. By watching the same spot return to the same place on the disc, he found that Jupiter turns in under ten hours and Mars in a little more than an Earth day. He also saw that Jupiter is visibly squashed, a fact Newton later explained by its fast spin.
- Convert observed (synodic) rotation periods into sidereal ones.
- Relate rotation rate to the flattening of a fluid planet.
Cassini found Jupiter’s period to be about \(9^{\mathrm h}56^{\mathrm m}\) and that of Mars about \(24^{\mathrm h}40^{\mathrm m}\), within a few minutes of the modern values of \(9^{\mathrm h}55.5^{\mathrm m}\) (System III) and \(24^{\mathrm h}37.4^{\mathrm m}\). Around 1690 he noticed that spots near Jupiter’s equator went round faster than those at higher latitude: the first evidence that a planet’s visible surface does not rotate as a rigid body.
A marking that returns to the central meridian as seen from the Sun does so with the solar period \(P_\odot\), related to the sidereal rotation period \(P\) and the orbital period \(T\) by
\[ \frac1{P_\odot}=\frac1P-\frac1T \qquad\text{(prograde rotation).} \]Seen from the moving Earth there is a further small, variable correction from the change in the planet’s direction.
Let \(q=\omega^2a^3/(GM)\) be the ratio of centrifugal to gravitational acceleration at the equator. For a homogeneous fluid planet, the flattening is \(f=\tfrac54q\). For a planet with all its mass at the centre, \(f=\tfrac12q\). Real planets lie between.
The homogeneous result is Newton’s; the point-mass limit is Huygens’s. Jupiter has \(q\approx0.089\) and observed \(f\approx0.065\), between \(0.045\) and \(0.111\), which reveals a dense core. The same reasoning, applied by Newton to the Earth, predicted the oblate shape that Cassini’s school disputed (Lesson 10).
Exercise 5.1Mars has a sidereal rotation period of \(24.6229\) h and an orbital period of \(686.98\) days. Find the length of the Martian solar day.
Show solution
Exercise 5.2Jupiter has equatorial radius \(71\,492\) km, \(GM=1.267\times10^{17}\ \mathrm{m^3\,s^{-2}}\) and rotation period \(9.925\) h. Compute \(q\), the equatorial rotation speed, and the flattening predicted by the homogeneous model.
Show solution
Jupiter’s satellites, longitude and the speed of light
For the general reader. Galileo had suggested that the moons of Jupiter, disappearing into its shadow at predictable instants, could serve as a clock in the sky visible from anywhere on Earth. Comparing local time with the predicted time of an eclipse gives longitude. Cassini’s tables made the method work on land. Then the eclipses began to arrive early or late, and the reason turned out to be the time light takes to cross space.
- Compute longitude from the timing of a satellite eclipse.
- Derive the light-time inequality in the eclipses of Io.
- Understand the dispute between Cassini and Ole Rømer.
Longitude
The Earth turns \(15^\circ\) per hour. If an eclipse of Io is predicted for \(T_0\) in Paris time and observed at local time \(T\), the observer is at longitude \(15^\circ\times(T-T_0)\) east of Paris (with time in hours). Using Cassini’s tables, astronomers of the Academy, Jean Picard among them, fixed the longitudes of places across France in the 1670s and 1680s. The results shrank the outline of the kingdom on the map, especially along the Atlantic coast. The method needed a large telescope on steady ground, so it never worked at sea.
Light time
Let \(\Delta(t)\) be the Earth–Jupiter distance. An event at Jupiter at time \(t\) is seen at \(t+\Delta(t)/c\). Successive eclipses of a satellite with period \(P\) are therefore observed at intervals
\[ P_{\text{obs}}\approx P\Big(1+\frac{\dot\Delta}{c}\Big), \]and the accumulated delay between conjunction and opposition of Jupiter is \((\Delta_{\max}-\Delta_{\min})/c\approx2a_\oplus/c\).
On 22 August 1676 Cassini announced to the Academy that his eclipse tables would include a new inequality in the motion of the satellites, and he mentioned that it could be explained by a finite speed of light. Ole Rømer, a Danish astronomer working at the Observatory, developed that explanation and predicted that an emergence of Io in November 1676 would be seen about ten minutes later than the old tables predicted. He presented his theory to the Academy on 21 November 1676, estimating that light took about 22 minutes to cross the diameter of the Earth’s orbit. Cassini then turned against the idea. The other satellites did not show the effect clearly, and Io had other irregularities. His 1693 tables used empirical corrections that differed from satellite to satellite. The finite speed of light was generally accepted after James Bradley’s discovery of aberration in 1728.
Exercise 6.1An eclipse of Io is predicted for \(22^{\mathrm h}14^{\mathrm m}\) Paris time. An observer sees it at \(21^{\mathrm h}20^{\mathrm m}\) local time. Find the observer’s longitude relative to Paris.
Show solution
Exercise 6.2Io’s period is \(1.769\) days. When the Earth is receding from Jupiter at its full orbital speed of \(29.8\) km/s, by how much does each observed interval exceed \(P\)? How many seconds accumulate over 40 orbits?
Show solution
Exercise 6.3Rømer’s 22 minutes for the diameter of the Earth’s orbit implies what speed of light, using \(a_\oplus=1.496\times10^{8}\) km? What is the modern light time for the diameter?
Show solution
Saturn: four moons and a gap
For the general reader. Huygens had found Saturn’s largest moon, Titan, and explained its strange appendages as a ring. Cassini, with longer telescopes, found four more moons between 1671 and 1684, and in 1675 saw that the ring was really two rings separated by a dark band. He suggested the ring was a swarm of tiny satellites, which is correct.
- Use Kepler’s third law to weigh Saturn from its moons.
- Explain the inner edge of the Cassini division by a resonance with Mimas.
- Read the brightness changes of Iapetus as synchronous rotation.
Iapetus (1671): \(a=3\,560\,820\) km, \(P=79.32\) d. Rhea (1672): \(a=527\,108\) km, \(P=4.518\) d. Tethys (1684): \(a=294\,619\) km, \(P=1.888\) d. Dione (1684): \(a=377\,396\) km, \(P=2.737\) d.
For a satellite of negligible mass on an orbit of semi-major axis \(a\) and period \(P\) about a planet of mass \(M\),
\[ GM=\frac{4\pi^2a^3}{P^2}. \]Iapetus
Cassini noticed that Iapetus was easy to see when west of Saturn and nearly invisible when east of it. He concluded that one hemisphere is much darker than the other and that the moon always keeps the same face toward Saturn, as our Moon does toward the Earth. Spacecraft images confirmed the two-toned surface in detail.
The division
The Cassini division lies between about 117,600 and 122,200 km from Saturn’s centre. Its inner edge is set by the innermost of the larger moons, Mimas (\(a=185\,539\) km), found by William Herschel in 1789. A ring particle at radius \(r\) has period proportional to \(r^{3/2}\). Where the period is exactly half that of Mimas, the moon pulls the particle the same way at every second conjunction, and the disturbances add up. This 2:1 resonance clears particles from the edge of the B ring.
Exercise 7.1Compute \(GM\) for Saturn from Iapetus and from Rhea. Do they agree? Taking \(GM_\odot=1.327\times10^{20}\ \mathrm{m^3\,s^{-2}}\), what fraction of the Sun’s mass is Saturn?
Show solution
Exercise 7.2Find the radius of the 2:1 resonance with Mimas and compare with the Cassini division.
Show solution
Mars in 1672 and the distance of the Sun
For the general reader. In September 1672 Mars came close to the Earth. The Academy had sent Jean Richer to Cayenne, in French Guiana, nearly 7,000 km from Paris. By comparing Mars against the stars from both places, Cassini measured its distance, and through Kepler’s third law the distance of the Sun. The answer, about 140 million kilometres, was the first value close to the truth.
- Compute the parallax shift between two stations on the same meridian.
- Convert a planetary parallax into the solar parallax and the astronomical unit.
The horizontal parallax of a body at distance \(d\) is \(\pi\), with \(\sin\pi=R/d\) for the Earth’s radius \(R\). An observer sees the body displaced from its geocentric position, away from the zenith, by about \(\pi\sin z\), where \(z\) is the zenith distance.
Two observers at latitudes \(\varphi_1>\varphi_2\), on nearly the same meridian, observe a body at declination \(\delta\) as it crosses the meridian south of both zeniths. The difference in its measured declination relative to a nearby star is
\[ \delta_2-\delta_1\approx\pi\,\big[\sin(\varphi_1-\delta)-\sin(\varphi_2-\delta)\big]. \]Each observer sees the body depressed toward the southern horizon by \(\pi\sin z_i\) with \(z_i=\varphi_i-\delta\); the star’s parallax is negligible. Paris and Cayenne differ by about 3.6 hours in longitude, so the two meridian crossings are not simultaneous, and Mars’s own motion in the interval had to be removed using observations on several nights.
If Mars is at distance \(\Delta\) AU, its parallax is \(\pi_\odot/\Delta\), where \(\pi_\odot\) is the solar parallax. Kepler’s laws give \(\Delta\) from the orbits, so the measured \(\pi_{\text{Mars}}\) gives \(\pi_\odot=\Delta\,\pi_{\text{Mars}}\).
The Paris–Cayenne campaign led to a solar parallax of about \(9.5''\), against the modern \(8.794''\). In England Flamsteed reached a similar bound from a single station (see the course on Flamsteed). Older values, going back to antiquity, had made the Sun twenty times closer. Halley later proposed the transits of Venus as a more precise method (see the course on Halley).
Exercise 8.1Paris is at latitude \(48.84^\circ\) N and Cayenne at \(4.93^\circ\) N. Take Mars at declination \(-15^\circ\) with horizontal parallax \(25''\). What declination difference do the two stations measure?
Show solution
Exercise 8.2A solar parallax of \(9.5''\) corresponds to what Earth–Sun distance with \(R=6378\) km? Compare with the modern \(1.496\times10^8\) km.
Show solution
Cassini’s laws of the Moon’s rotation
For the general reader. The Moon always shows us nearly the same face. Cassini went further. He worked out how its axis is tilted and how that tilt moves, and found three simple rules. They hold not only for the Moon: many moons and planets have settled into the same arrangement, now called a Cassini state.
- State Cassini’s three laws.
- Derive the amplitudes of the optical librations from them.
- The Moon rotates uniformly about its axis with a period equal to its sidereal orbital period.
- The Moon’s equator is inclined to the ecliptic at a constant angle \(I\) (modern value \(1.54^\circ\)).
- The ascending node of the Moon’s orbit on the ecliptic coincides with the descending node of the Moon’s equator on the ecliptic. Equivalently, the normals to the ecliptic, the orbit and the lunar equator lie in one plane, with the ecliptic normal between the other two.
Since the orbit’s node regresses with a period of 18.6 years, the third law means the spin axis precesses with it, keeping the three normals coplanar. The angle between the Moon’s equator and its orbit is \(I+i\approx1.54^\circ+5.15^\circ\approx6.7^\circ\). The laws were later derived from gravitational dynamics by Lagrange and Laplace; the modern view treats them as a stable equilibrium of the spin axis driven by tides.
Librations
Because rotation is uniform but orbital motion is not, we see a little around the east and west limbs: the libration in longitude. Because the equator is tilted to the orbit, we see alternately over the north and south poles: the libration in latitude.
Exercise 9.1Using Lesson 04’s formula \(\nu-M\approx2e\sin M\) with \(e=0.0549\), find the amplitude of the optical libration in longitude.
Show solution
Exercise 9.2Show from the third law that the amplitude of the libration in latitude is \(I+i\), not \(|I-i|\).
Show solution
Ovals and the figure of the Earth
For the general reader. Cassini was an empiricist who distrusted grand theory. He proposed his own curves for planetary orbits in place of Kepler’s ellipses, and he believed his survey of France showed the Earth to be stretched toward the poles, against Newton. Both positions were later abandoned, but the mathematics of his ovals and the methods of his survey lasted.
- Derive the equation of a Cassini oval and classify its shapes.
- Relate the length of a degree of latitude to the flattening of the Earth.
Cassini ovals
Given foci \((\pm a,0)\) and \(b>0\), the Cassini oval is the set of points whose distances \(d_1,d_2\) from the foci satisfy \(d_1d_2=b^2\). Its equation is
\[ \big((x-a)^2+y^2\big)\big((x+a)^2+y^2\big)=b^4, \qquad\text{or in polar form}\qquad r^4-2a^2r^2\cos2\theta+a^4=b^4. \]If \(b\lt a\) the curve has two loops, one around each focus; if \(b=a\) it is the lemniscate of Bernoulli, \(r^2=2a^2\cos2\theta\); if \(b>a\) it is a single loop, convex when \(b\ge\sqrt2\,a\).
Derivation. Expanding, \(\big((x^2+y^2+a^2)-2ax\big)\big((x^2+y^2+a^2)+2ax\big)=(r^2+a^2)^2-4a^2x^2\). With \(x=r\cos\theta\), \(4a^2r^2\cos^2\theta=2a^2r^2(1+\cos2\theta)\), which gives the polar form. On the \(y\)-axis (\(\theta=90^\circ\)) we need \(r^4+2a^2r^2+a^4-b^4=0\), so \(r^2=-a^2+b^2\): there are points on the \(y\)-axis exactly when \(b\ge a\), which separates the one-loop and two-loop cases.
Cassini studied these curves around 1680 as possible planetary orbits, with the Sun at one focus. For small eccentricity they are close to ellipses, and the observations of his time could not easily distinguish them. Newton’s derivation of the ellipse from the inverse-square law settled the matter.
The length of a degree
From 1683 Cassini measured an arc of the meridian through Paris by triangulation, measuring south while Philippe de La Hire measured north. The work stopped in 1684 for lack of money and resumed in 1700 with his son Jacques, reaching Perpignan. The French results suggested that a degree of latitude grows shorter toward the north.
On an ellipsoid of revolution with equatorial radius \(a\) and small flattening \(f\), the length of one degree of latitude at latitude \(\varphi\) is, to first order in \(f\),
\[ L(\varphi)\approx\frac{\pi a}{180}\big(1-2f+3f\sin^2\varphi\big). \]So \(L\) increases toward the poles when \(f>0\) (oblate) and decreases when \(f<0\) (prolate).
The meridian radius of curvature is \(M=a(1-e^2)(1-e^2\sin^2\varphi)^{-3/2}\) with \(e^2=2f-f^2\). Expanding to first order gives the formula. Over the short French arc the expected change was tiny and easily swamped by errors. The expeditions to Lapland (1736–37) and Peru settled the matter for Newton (see the courses on Newton and Clairaut).
Exercise 10.1Show that the lemniscate \(r^2=2a^2\cos2\theta\) has \(d_1d_2=a^2\), and find its area.
Show solution
Exercise 10.2Modern degree lengths are 111.51 km at latitude \(66.3^\circ\) and 110.57 km at the equator. Use the first-order formula to estimate \(f\).
Show solution
Exercise 10.3For \(f=1/298\), how much longer is a degree at \(51^\circ\) than at \(43^\circ\) (roughly the ends of the French arc)? Why was the Cassini survey vulnerable to error?
Show solution
Director in Paris, 1671–1712
For forty years Cassini ran the Paris Observatory as the centre of French astronomy. Formally he was one academician among others, but the King’s favour and his own energy made him its master. He brought long-focus objectives from Campani and, later, very long aerial telescopes with no tube at all, the lenses mounted on masts. He sent observers abroad: Richer to Cayenne in 1672, and others to the coasts of France to fix longitudes. Jean Picard, who had measured a degree of the meridian near Paris, worked closely with him until Picard’s death in 1682. Ole Rømer worked at the Observatory from 1672 to 1681.
The discoveries of the Paris years were made there: Iapetus and Rhea, the division in Saturn’s ring, Tethys and Dione. In 1679 he presented to the Academy a large map of the Moon. In 1683 he described the zodiacal light, the faint cone of light along the ecliptic after sunset, as sunlight scattered by matter around the Sun. In 1680 and 1681 the young Edmond Halley worked with him on the great comet (see the course on Halley). Cassini also wrote an explanation of Siamese astronomical rules, published in Simon de La Loubère’s account of Siam in 1691.
He took his son Jacques on a journey through Italy in 1695, restoring the San Petronio meridian he had built forty years earlier. From about 1709 Jacques took over more of his duties. By 1711 Cassini was almost blind; the historian of the Academy, Bernard de Fontenelle, wrote that he bore it calmly, sustained by his faith. He died in Paris on 14 September 1712, aged 87.
DiscussionCassini accepted the finite speed of light at first and then opposed it; he rejected Newtonian gravitation and Newton’s flattened Earth. Was his caution good empirical practice or institutional conservatism? Use Lessons 06 and 10, and compare Flamsteed’s attitude to theory in his dealings with Newton.
The Cassini dynasty and legacy
Four generations of Cassinis directed the Paris Observatory: Giovanni Domenico; his son Jacques Cassini (1677–1756), who completed and published the meridian arc and defended an elongated Earth; Jacques’s son César-François Cassini de Thury (1714–1784), who accepted the flattened Earth after the Lapland results and began the great map of France; and his son Jean-Dominique Cassini (1748–1845), under whom the map was completed. The Carte de Cassini, built on a national network of triangles, was the first topographic map of a whole country based on geodetic survey. Giacomo Filippo Maraldi, Cassini’s nephew, also worked at the Observatory.
Historians have judged Cassini in two ways. Jean-Baptiste Delambre, writing in the nineteenth century, portrayed him as authoritarian and quick to take credit. Later historians, such as René Taton, emphasized the observer and organizer, more gifted at seeing than at theory.
Legacy
- Saturn: four moons and the Cassini division. NASA’s Cassini spacecraft, launched in 1997 with the European Huygens probe, orbited Saturn from 2004 to 2017.
- Planetary physics: the first rotation periods of planets, Jupiter’s flattening and differential rotation, and the Cassini states of rotating moons and planets.
- The scale of the solar system: the first reasonably accurate solar parallax.
- Geodesy and cartography: longitude from Jupiter’s satellites, the Paris meridian and the map of France.
- Names: craters on the Moon and Mars, the asteroid 24101 Cassini, and the Cassini ovals of geometry.
Final projectChoose one of Cassini’s measurements: Jupiter’s rotation, the solar parallax, or a Saturnian satellite’s period. Reconstruct how it could be made with a seventeenth-century telescope and clock, estimate the main sources of error, and compare his value with the modern one.
Sources and further reading
Biography
- J. J. O’Connor and E. F. Robertson, Giovanni Domenico Cassini, MacTutor History of Mathematics.
- Giovanni Domenico Cassini, Wikipedia (with extensive references).
- Jean Dominique (Giovanni Domenico) Cassini, High Altitude Observatory, NCAR.
- R. Taton, Cassini, Gian Domenico (Jean-Dominique), Dictionary of Scientific Biography, vol. 3, Scribner, 1971.
- J. L. Heilbron, The Sun in the Church: Cathedrals as Solar Observatories, Harvard University Press, 1999.
Astronomy
- Basilica of San Petronio (the meridian line), Wikipedia.
- Rømer’s determination of the speed of light, Wikipedia.
- L. Bobis, J. Lequeux, Cassini, Rømer and the velocity of light, Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage 11 (2008).
- Cassini’s laws, Wikipedia.
- Cassini oval, Wikipedia.
- Solar parallax, Encyclopaedia Britannica.
- C. D. Murray, S. F. Dermott, Solar System Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, 1999 (resonances, Cassini states).
- J. Meeus, Astronomical Algorithms, 2nd ed., Willmann-Bell, 1998 (librations, parallax).