courseshub.world · Lives in Mathematics and Physics

Albert A. Michelson

Albert Abraham Michelson

A course in two strands: the life of a Prussian-born naval officer who became the first American Nobel laureate in science, and the instruments he built to measure light, from the rotating mirror to the interferometer that found no ether wind.

Born 19 December 1852, Strelno (Strzelno), Prussia Died 9 May 1931, Pasadena Nobel Prize Physics, 1907 Level advanced undergraduate
The interferometer. A half-silvered plate splits the light into two perpendicular arms. The returning beams recombine, and a change of half a wavelength in one arm moves the fringes by one whole fringe.
Lesson 00

How to use this course

Albert Michelson is remembered for an experiment that failed. In 1887 he and Edward Morley looked for the motion of the Earth through the luminiferous ether and found none, a result that relativity later made central. The rest of his career is just as remarkable. For fifty years he measured the speed of light more accurately than anyone else. He expressed the metre in wavelengths of light, measured the first stellar diameter, measured the rotation of the Earth with light, and built the instrument that now detects gravitational waves. His Nobel citation honoured his optical precision instruments and the measurements made with them.

Prerequisites for Part II
  • First-year mechanics and waves: wavelength, frequency, interference.
  • Two-beam interference (see Lesson 04 of the Fizeau course).
  • For Lesson 06, the basic ideas of special relativity.
  • For Lessons 07 and 08, the Fourier transform.

Each technical lesson opens with a paragraph for the general reader, then gives precise statements, derivations and exercises with folded solutions. Numbers are in SI units; where Michelson’s own figures are known, they are quoted and checked.

Reference

Timeline

1852Born 19 December in Strelno (now Strzelno, Poland), in the Prussian province of Posen, to a Jewish merchant family.
c. 1855The family emigrates to the United States and reaches California by way of Panama.
1869Appointed to the U.S. Naval Academy at Annapolis by President Ulysses S. Grant.
1873Leaves the Academy; two years at sea, including a cruise in the West Indies.
1875Instructor in physics and chemistry at the Naval Academy.
1877Marries Margaret Hemingway. Begins devising his rotating-mirror method for the speed of light.
1879June–July: measures the speed of light at Annapolis, 299 940 km/s in vacuum. Posted to the Nautical Almanac Office under Simon Newcomb.
1880–82Studies in Berlin, Heidelberg and Paris. Builds his first interferometer in Berlin and uses it at Potsdam in 1881. Resigns from the Navy.
1883Professor of physics at the Case School of Applied Science, Cleveland.
1886With Edward Morley, repeats Fizeau’s moving-water experiment.
1887April–July: the Michelson–Morley experiment. Proposes a wavelength of light as the standard of length.
1888Rumford Prize of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Elected to the National Academy of Sciences.
1890Professor at Clark University, Worcester, Massachusetts.
1891Measures the diameters of Jupiter’s Galilean satellites by interference at Lick Observatory.
1892First head of the physics department of the new University of Chicago. 1892–93: measures the metre in wavelengths of cadmium light at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures, near Paris, with Jean-René Benoît.
1898Echelon spectroscope. Harmonic analyzer, with S. W. Stratton.
1899Marries Edna Stanton, after the end of his first marriage.
1900President of the American Physical Society.
1903Light Waves and Their Uses, from his Lowell lectures.
1907Nobel Prize in Physics, the first to an American scientist. Copley Medal of the Royal Society.
1910–11President of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.
1913–19With Henry Gale, measures the tides in the solid Earth with interferometers in water-filled pipes.
1917–21Naval Reserve service in the First World War; designs a rangefinder adopted by the Navy.
1920December: with Francis Pease, measures the angular diameter of Betelgeuse at Mount Wilson.
1923–27President of the National Academy of Sciences.
1925Michelson–Gale–Pearson experiment detects the Earth’s rotation with light.
1926–27Speed of light between Mount Wilson and Mount San Antonio: 299 796 ± 4 km/s.
1927Studies in Optics.
1929Leaves Chicago for Pasadena; begins a measurement in an evacuated pipe at the Irvine Ranch.
1931Dies 9 May in Pasadena, aged 78. The vacuum-pipe result is published in 1935.
Part I · Formation
Lesson 01

From Strelno to the mining camps, 1852–1869

Albert Abraham Michelson was born on 19 December 1852 in Strelno, a small town in the Prussian province of Posen, now Strzelno in Poland. His family was Jewish and not religious; he remained an agnostic all his life. When he was about two the family emigrated to the United States, crossing the isthmus of Panama to reach California in the years of the gold rush. Records give the year as 1854 or 1855.

His father kept a dry-goods store in the mining town of Murphy’s Camp, in Calaveras County, and later moved the business to Virginia City, Nevada, the boom town of the Comstock silver lode. A local violinist taught the boy the violin, which he played for the rest of his life. His younger sister Miriam Michelson became a successful novelist and journalist.

There was no serious school in the camps, so Albert was sent to San Francisco for his secondary education. He lived for a time with the family of his high-school principal and earned a few dollars a month by looking after the school’s scientific apparatus. Millikan’s memoir of him records the arrangement, and it is the first sign of the experimenter he became.

Lesson 02

Annapolis, 1869–1879

In 1869 Michelson competed for his Nevada district’s appointment to the U.S. Naval Academy and did not receive it. He travelled to Washington and obtained one of the at-large appointments in the gift of President Ulysses S. Grant. He entered the Academy as a cadet midshipman on 29 June 1869. He was strong in science and weak in seamanship, and he left the Academy in 1873 for two years at sea, which included a cruise in the West Indies. He was promoted ensign in 1874.

In December 1875 he returned to Annapolis as instructor in physics and chemistry. In April 1877 he married Margaret Hemingway, the daughter of a wealthy New York family; they had two sons and a daughter. Preparing a class demonstration of Foucault’s rotating-mirror method for the speed of light, he saw how to improve it enormously. He began trials in the winter of 1877–78 with apparatus costing a few dollars. In 1878 his father-in-law gave him $2000 for better equipment, and in June and July 1879 he made the measurements that made his name (Lesson 04). His result, published in 1880, was the most accurate yet obtained.

The same year he was posted to the Nautical Almanac Office in Washington, directed by Simon Newcomb, the leading American astronomer, who was planning his own measurement of the speed of light. Michelson worked with him on it before leaving for Europe.

Lesson 03

Europe and Cleveland, 1880–1889

In 1880 Michelson took leave from the Navy to study in Europe, as ambitious American physicists then did. He spent the winter of 1880–81 in the Berlin laboratory of Hermann von Helmholtz, then studied at Heidelberg and in Paris at the Collège de France and the École polytechnique, where Alfred Cornu was among his teachers. In Berlin he designed an instrument to detect the Earth’s motion through the ether by splitting a beam of light into two perpendicular paths and recombining them. Street traffic made it unusable in Berlin, so in 1881 he moved it to the Astrophysical Observatory at Potsdam. He found no effect (Lesson 05). He resigned from the Navy in 1881.

In 1883 he became professor of physics at the new Case School of Applied Science in Cleveland, Ohio. Next door, at Western Reserve University, worked the chemist Edward Morley, a meticulous experimenter known for his determination of the atomic weight of oxygen. In 1884 Michelson repeated Foucault’s comparison of light in air and water, extending it to carbon disulphide. In 1886 he and Morley repeated Fizeau’s experiment on light in moving water with a much larger apparatus and confirmed Fresnel’s drag coefficient. Then, in the spring and summer of 1887, they performed the ether-drift experiment again with an instrument ten times more sensitive than the Potsdam one (Lesson 06).

The same year they proposed that a wavelength of light, rather than a metal bar, should serve as the ultimate standard of length. Michelson was elected to the National Academy of Sciences in 1888 and received the Rumford Prize of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. In 1889 he accepted a professorship at the new Clark University in Worcester, Massachusetts, and moved there in 1890.

Part II · The physics
Lesson 04

The rotating mirror, 1879

For the general reader. To time something as fast as light over a short distance, turn time into an angle. A mirror spinning hundreds of times a second reflects a beam to a distant mirror and back. By the time the light returns, the spinning mirror has turned slightly, so the returning beam comes back at a slightly different angle. Measure the angle and you know the travel time. Léon Foucault invented the method; Michelson made the deflection more than a hundred times larger.

Goals
  • Derive the deflection formula for the rotating-mirror method.
  • Understand Michelson’s optical change and why it enlarged the deflection.
  • Reproduce his 1879 value from his own numbers.

The deflection

Proposition (rotating mirror)

A plane mirror turns at \(n\) revolutions per second. Light leaves it, travels a distance \(D\) to a fixed mirror, and returns to the rotating mirror after time \(\tau=2D/c\). The returning beam is deviated by

\[ \varphi = 2\cdot 2\pi n\,\tau = \frac{8\pi nD}{c}, \]

and an image formed a distance \(r\) from the rotating mirror is displaced by \(d=r\tan\varphi\approx r\varphi\). Hence \(c=8\pi nDr/d\).

The factor 2 arises because a mirror turned through angle \(\alpha\) turns a reflected ray through \(2\alpha\), and the mirror turns through \(2\pi n\tau\) during the round trip.

Michelson’s improvement

In Foucault’s arrangement a lens formed an image of the source on a concave fixed mirror centred on the rotating mirror. The fixed mirror had to stay close, and Foucault folded his path with five concave mirrors to reach about 20 m. The image displacement was well under a millimetre. Michelson placed the rotating mirror near the focus of a lens of very long focal length (150 feet, about 46 m, made by Alvan Clark and Sons) and put a large plane mirror at the far end, perpendicular to the beam. The returning light was focused back near the slit whatever the distance, so \(D\) could be made large, and the displacement grew with both \(D\) and the radius \(r\). Michelson’s formula, in his own notation, is \(\tan\varphi=d/r\) with \(V=2592000''\,Dn/\varphi''\), where his \(D\) is twice the mirror separation; it is the same as the proposition.

The 1879 measurement

The mirrors stood 1986.23 feet (605.4 m) apart along the sea wall of the Naval Academy. The mirror turned at about 257 revolutions per second, timed against a tuning fork, and the radius was about 28 feet (8.6 m). The displacement of the slit image was over 100 mm, measured with a micrometer. After corrections for temperature and for the refractive index of air, his final value was

\[ c = 299\,940 \pm 50\ \text{km/s}, \]

within 0.05% of the modern value. Newcomb’s more elaborate measurement in Washington (1880–82) gave 299 860 ± 30 km/s, and Michelson’s own repetition at Cleveland in 1882–83 gave 299 853 ± 60 km/s.

Exercise 4.1Take \(D=605.4\) m, \(n=257.4\) rev/s and \(r=8.58\) m. What displacement \(d\) should Michelson have seen in air, where light travels at about 299 710 km/s?

Show solution
\(\varphi=8\pi nD/c=8\pi\times257.4\times605.4/2.9971\times10^{8}\approx1.307\times10^{-2}\) rad, about 2695″. Then \(d=r\tan\varphi\approx8.58\times0.01307\approx0.112\) m. Michelson’s specimen readings were about 112 micrometer divisions of 0.996 mm, in agreement.

Exercise 4.2If \(d\) can be read to ±0.02 mm, what is the relative error from this source alone in Michelson’s experiment, and in an experiment like Foucault’s with \(d\approx0.7\) mm?

Show solution
Michelson: \(0.02/112\approx1.8\times10^{-4}\). Foucault-type: \(0.02/0.7\approx3\%\). Enlarging the deflection reduces the reading error in direct proportion, which is why Michelson worked to increase \(D\) and \(r\).

Exercise 4.3Michelson corrected his mean value in air by adding about 80 km/s to reduce it to vacuum. What refractive index of air does this imply?

Show solution
\(c_{\text{vac}}/c_{\text{air}}=n\), so \(n-1\approx80/299\,864\approx2.7\times10^{-4}\). This is the index of air for visible light near room temperature (the standard value is about \(2.8\times10^{-4}\)). Strictly, a time-of-flight experiment measures the group velocity, a subtlety Lord Rayleigh raised after Michelson’s carbon disulphide measurements; for air the difference is small.
Lesson 05

The interferometer, 1881

For the general reader. If light is a wave in an ether at rest, then the Earth, moving around the Sun at 30 km/s, moves through that ether, and light should take slightly longer to go out and back along the direction of motion than across it. The difference is one part in a hundred million, far beyond any clock. Michelson’s idea was to race two beams against each other and let interference compare their travel times to a fraction of a wavelength.

Goals
  • Understand the optics of the Michelson interferometer.
  • Derive the round-trip times in a moving interferometer, correcting Michelson’s 1881 error.
  • See why first-order experiments could not detect the ether wind.

The instrument

Light from a source falls on a plate of glass half-silvered on one face, set at 45°. Half the light is transmitted to mirror \(M_1\), half reflected to mirror \(M_2\). Each beam returns along its path, and the plate recombines parts of both towards an observer. One beam passes through the glass plate three times and the other once, so Michelson added a compensating plate of the same glass in the second arm. Then the two arms differ only in their air paths, and white-light fringes can be found when the paths are equal.

Proposition (fringes)

If the arm lengths are \(L_1\) and \(L_2\) and the light has wavelength \(\lambda\), the intensity at the centre of the field is

\[ I=\tfrac{I_0}{2}\Big(1+\cos\frac{2\pi\cdot2(L_1-L_2)}{\lambda}\Big). \]

Moving one mirror by \(\lambda/2\) moves the pattern by one fringe. A change in the round-trip time difference \(\Delta t\) shifts it by \(c\,\Delta t/\lambda\) fringes.

Round trips in the ether

Suppose the apparatus moves through the ether at speed \(v\) parallel to arm 1, and write \(\beta=v/c\). Along arm 1 light travels at \(c-v\) going and \(c+v\) returning, relative to the apparatus:

\[ t_\parallel=\frac{L}{c-v}+\frac{L}{c+v}=\frac{2L}{c}\,\frac{1}{1-\beta^2}. \]

For the transverse arm, in the ether frame the light must travel along the hypotenuse of a triangle while the mirror moves sideways, so its speed relative to the apparatus is \(\sqrt{c^2-v^2}\) each way:

\[ t_\perp=\frac{2L}{\sqrt{c^2-v^2}}=\frac{2L}{c}\,\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\beta^2}}. \]
Proposition (second-order effect)

For equal arms, \(t_\parallel-t_\perp=\dfrac{L}{c}\beta^2+O(\beta^4)\). Rotating the apparatus by 90° exchanges the roles of the arms, so the expected fringe shift on rotation is

\[ \Delta N=\frac{2L\beta^2}{\lambda}. \]

In 1881 Michelson took the transverse time to be simply \(2L/c\), ignoring the sideways motion. That doubled the predicted effect. Alfred Potier pointed out the error in 1882 and Hendrik Lorentz analysed it in 1886. With arms of about 1.2 m, Michelson expected a shift of about 0.04 fringe; the corrected prediction was half that, comparable to the noise. His conclusion that the ether was carried along with the Earth was therefore not secure.

Why second order?

Experiments that compare a single light path with something else, such as Arago’s prism of 1810 or Fizeau’s and Hoek’s tests, are sensitive to first-order effects in \(\beta\). Fresnel’s partial drag (see the Fizeau course, Lesson 08) made all such first-order effects cancel. Only a round-trip experiment sensitive to \(\beta^2\approx10^{-8}\) could test the stationary ether, and James Clerk Maxwell had written in 1879 that such an effect was too small to measure. The interferometer was Michelson’s answer.

Exercise 5.1Expand \(t_\parallel\) and \(t_\perp\) to second order in \(\beta\) and confirm the proposition. What would Michelson’s 1881 formula have given?

Show solution
\(t_\parallel\approx\frac{2L}{c}(1+\beta^2)\), \(t_\perp\approx\frac{2L}{c}(1+\tfrac12\beta^2)\), so the difference is \(\frac{L}{c}\beta^2\). With \(t_\perp=2L/c\) one gets \(\frac{2L}{c}\beta^2\), twice the correct value.

Exercise 5.2An interferometer is illuminated with sodium light, \(\lambda=589\) nm. A mirror is moved by a micrometer screw, and 2000 fringes are counted. How far did the mirror move?

Show solution
Each fringe corresponds to \(\lambda/2\), so the displacement is \(2000\times294.5\) nm \(=0.589\) mm. Counting fringes turns the interferometer into a ruler graduated in half-wavelengths, the idea behind Lesson 07.
Lesson 06

Michelson and Morley, 1887

For the general reader. In Cleveland in 1887 Michelson and Morley built an interferometer ten times more sensitive, floated it on mercury so that it could be turned smoothly, and watched the fringes as it rotated. The ether wind should have moved them by four tenths of a fringe. They moved by less than one hundredth. Within twenty years this null result had become one of the supports of Einstein’s special relativity.

Goals
  • Compute the expected shift and the upper bound on the ether wind.
  • Derive the FitzGerald–Lorentz contraction as an explanation.
  • Understand how special relativity reinterprets the result.

The apparatus

The optics were mounted on a sandstone slab about 1.5 m square and 0.3 m thick, resting on a wooden float in a circular trough of mercury in the basement of a dormitory at Western Reserve University. Mirrors at the corners reflected each beam back and forth several times, giving an effective arm length \(L\approx11\) m. The slab turned slowly, about once in six minutes, and the observers read the fringe position at sixteen marked directions. Observations were made at noon and in the evening on several days in July 1887, so that the Earth’s orbital and rotational velocities would combine differently.

Result (Michelson and Morley, November 1887)

The expected fringe shift for \(v=30\) km/s was about 0.4 fringe. The observed shift was less than about one fortieth of this. The authors concluded that the relative velocity of the Earth and the ether was probably less than one sixth of the Earth’s orbital velocity, and certainly less than one fourth.

The contraction hypothesis

In 1889 George FitzGerald, and independently Lorentz in 1892, proposed that a body moving through the ether contracts along its motion by the factor \(\sqrt{1-\beta^2}\).

Proposition

If the arm parallel to the motion has length \(L\sqrt{1-\beta^2}\) and the transverse arm has length \(L\), then \(t_\parallel=t_\perp\) exactly, for every orientation of the interferometer.

Proof. \(t_\parallel=\frac{2L\sqrt{1-\beta^2}}{c(1-\beta^2)}=\frac{2L}{c\sqrt{1-\beta^2}}=t_\perp\). The same holds for an arm at any angle to the motion (Exercise 6.3), so rotating the apparatus changes nothing.

Lorentz and others regarded the contraction as a physical effect of the ether on molecular forces. In 1905 Einstein derived it, together with time dilation, from two postulates: the principle of relativity and the constancy of the speed of light. In special relativity there is no ether wind to detect, and the round-trip speed of light in every direction is \(c\) in every inertial frame. Historians still debate how much the Michelson–Morley result itself influenced Einstein, who said at different times that it played little direct role in his thinking and that it had mattered. It was, in any case, the most cited experimental support for the theory, and Michelson himself remained attached to the ether.

Later repetitions

Morley and Dayton Miller repeated the experiment in 1902–04, again with a null result. Miller later claimed a small positive drift of about 10 km/s from observations on Mount Wilson in the 1920s; the result was never reproduced, and Georg Joos in 1930 set an upper limit of about 1.5 km/s. Roy Kennedy and Edward Thorndike in 1932 used unequal arms to test the combination of contraction and time dilation. Modern versions with optical resonators bound any anisotropy of the speed of light to parts in \(10^{17}\) or better.

Exercise 6.1With \(L=11\) m, \(v=30\) km/s and \(\lambda=500\) nm, compute the expected fringe shift. What upper bound on \(v\) follows from an observed shift below 0.01 fringe?

Show solution
\(\beta^2=10^{-8}\), so \(\Delta N=2\times11\times10^{-8}/5\times10^{-7}=0.44\). Since \(\Delta N\propto v^2\), a shift below 0.01 gives \(v<30\sqrt{0.01/0.44}\approx4.5\) km/s, about one seventh of the orbital speed.

Exercise 6.2By how much would the contraction shorten the diameter of the Earth along its orbital motion?

Show solution
\(\Delta L\approx\tfrac12\beta^2L=\tfrac12\times10^{-8}\times1.27\times10^{7}\) m \(\approx6\) cm. No terrestrial measurement could detect it, because every ruler contracts too.

Exercise 6.3An arm of rest length \(L\) makes angle \(\theta\) with the velocity. Show that, with the contraction, the round-trip time is \(2L/(c\sqrt{1-\beta^2})\) independent of \(\theta\).

Show solution
Work in the ether frame. The contracted arm has components \(\ell_x=L\cos\theta\sqrt{1-\beta^2}\) and \(\ell_y=L\sin\theta\). Light leaving at time 0 meets the mirror at time \(t_1\) when \(c^2t_1^2=(\ell_x+vt_1)^2+\ell_y^2\), so \((1-\beta^2)c^2t_1^2-2v\ell_xt_1-(\ell_x^2+\ell_y^2)=0\). The return leg solves the same equation with \(v\to-v\). Adding the positive roots, \(t_1+t_2=\frac{2\sqrt{v^2\ell_x^2+(1-\beta^2)c^2(\ell_x^2+\ell_y^2)}}{(1-\beta^2)c^2}\). Substituting \(\ell_x,\ell_y\): \(v^2\ell_x^2+(1-\beta^2)c^2\ell_x^2=c^2\ell_x^2=c^2L^2\cos^2\theta(1-\beta^2)\), and \((1-\beta^2)c^2\ell_y^2=c^2L^2\sin^2\theta(1-\beta^2)\). The square root is \(cL\sqrt{1-\beta^2}\), so \(t_1+t_2=2L/(c\sqrt{1-\beta^2})\).
Lesson 07

Visibility, spectral lines and the metre

For the general reader. Fringes from a perfectly pure colour would persist however unequal the two arms of an interferometer. Real spectral lines have a width and often a hidden structure, so the fringes fade as the path difference grows. Michelson realized that the way they fade reveals the structure of the line. That let him find the purest line available, the red line of cadmium, and use it to measure the standard metre in wavelengths of light.

Goals
  • Prove that the visibility curve is the Fourier transform of the spectrum.
  • Compute visibility curves for doublets and broadened lines.
  • Follow the measurement of the metre in 1892–93 and the echelon spectroscope of 1898.

The visibility curve

Michelson defined the visibility of fringes as \(V=(I_{\max}-I_{\min})/(I_{\max}+I_{\min})\). Write the spectrum as a normalized intensity \(S(\sigma)\) in wavenumber \(\sigma=1/\lambda\), with \(\int S\,d\sigma=1\).

Theorem (visibility and spectrum)

In a two-beam interferometer with equal beams and path difference \(x\), the intensity is

\[ I(x)=I_0\Big(1+\operatorname{Re}\int S(\sigma)\,e^{2\pi i\sigma x}\,d\sigma\Big), \]

and if \(S\) is concentrated near \(\sigma_0\), the visibility is \(V(x)=\big|\int S(\sigma)\,e^{2\pi i(\sigma-\sigma_0)x}\,d\sigma\big|\), the modulus of the Fourier transform of the line profile.

Proof. Each wavenumber contributes \(S(\sigma)\,(1+\cos2\pi\sigma x)\) and incoherent components add in intensity. Factor out \(e^{2\pi i\sigma_0x}\): the remaining integral \(\gamma(x)\) varies slowly with \(x\), while the fast oscillation \(\cos(2\pi\sigma_0x+\arg\gamma)\) swings between \(\pm1\). So \(I\) oscillates between \(I_0(1\pm|\gamma|)\), and \(V=|\gamma|\).

Michelson could measure only \(|\gamma|\), not its phase, and he inferred line profiles by guessing shapes that fitted the visibility curves, aided by his harmonic analyzer. With this method, in 1891–92, he showed that many lines thought simple were close doublets or had fine structure, among them the red line of hydrogen. The full method, recording \(I(x)\) and computing the spectrum by a Fourier transform, became Fourier-transform spectroscopy in the 1950s.

Examples

(a) Two equal lines separated by \(\Delta\sigma\): \(V=|\cos(\pi\Delta\sigma x)|\).

(b) A Gaussian line of full width at half maximum \(\Delta\sigma\): \(V=\exp\!\big(-\pi^2\Delta\sigma^2x^2/(4\ln2)\big)\), which falls to \(1/2\) at \(x=2\ln2/(\pi\Delta\sigma)\approx0.44/\Delta\sigma\).

The metre in wavelengths

At the invitation of the International Committee for Weights and Measures, Michelson worked at the International Bureau at Sèvres in 1892–93 with Jean-René Benoît. Nobody could count a million and a half fringes directly, so Michelson built a chain of nine intermediate standards, or étalons, each about twice the length of the previous, from a fraction of a millimetre up to 10 cm. The fringes were counted for the shortest étalon; each longer one was compared with twice the previous by interference, with only a small fractional excess to measure; the 10 cm étalon was stepped ten times along the metre. They used the red, green and blue lines of cadmium, chosen because their visibility curves showed them to be nearly simple. The red line came out at about 643.85 nm in standard air, about 1 553 164 wavelengths to the metre. In 1907 the cadmium red line was adopted to define the ångström, the spectroscopists’ unit, and in 1960 the metre itself was redefined by a wavelength of krypton-86, compared through the chain back to cadmium.

The echelon

In 1898 Michelson introduced the echelon spectroscope: a stack of \(N\) glass plates of equal thickness \(t\), each set back from the next by a fixed step, forming a staircase. Light through successive steps acquires path differences of about \((n-1)t\), so the echelon is a grating with few lines working in very high order.

Proposition (resolving power of the echelon)

To first approximation, a transmission echelon of \(N\) plates of thickness \(t\) has resolving power

\[ \frac{\lambda}{\delta\lambda}\approx N\,\frac{t}{\lambda}\Big((n-1)-\lambda\frac{dn}{d\lambda}\Big). \]

As for any grating, the resolving power is the order times the number of elements; the order is the path difference per step in wavelengths, and dispersion of the glass adds the second term. Michelson’s later work on ruling engines produced large diffraction gratings: after about eight years of work, a 6-inch grating with 110 000 lines, and 8-inch and 10-inch gratings by 1915.

Exercise 7.1The visibility for the hydrogen red line (656.3 nm) is observed to fall to zero at a path difference of about 1.3 cm and to recover at 2.6 cm. Interpreting it as an equal doublet, find its separation in wavenumber and in wavelength.

Show solution
For a doublet, \(V=0\) first at \(x=1/(2\Delta\sigma)\), so \(\Delta\sigma=1/(2\times0.013)\approx38\ \text{m}^{-1}=0.38\ \text{cm}^{-1}\). Then \(\Delta\lambda=\lambda^2\Delta\sigma=(6.563\times10^{-7})^2\times38\approx1.6\times10^{-11}\) m \(=0.016\) nm. This is the order of the fine-structure splitting of \(\mathrm H\alpha\), about \(0.33\ \text{cm}^{-1}\). (The numbers in this exercise are illustrative.)

Exercise 7.2How many wavelengths of the cadmium red line, 643.847 nm in air, fit into the 10 cm étalon? Into the metre?

Show solution
\(0.1/6.43847\times10^{-7}\approx155\,316.4\) wavelengths; the metre is ten times this, about 1 553 164. Measuring the metre to one part in a few million requires knowing the fractional fringe at each step of the chain.

Exercise 7.3An echelon has 30 plates, each 1.0 cm thick, of glass with \(n-1=0.52\) at 500 nm. Ignoring dispersion, estimate its resolving power and the smallest resolvable wavelength difference at 500 nm.

Show solution
Order \(\approx(n-1)t/\lambda=0.52\times10^{-2}/5\times10^{-7}=10\,400\). Resolving power \(\approx30\times10\,400\approx3.1\times10^5\), so \(\delta\lambda\approx500/3.1\times10^5\approx0.0016\) nm. The dispersion term makes it somewhat larger.
Lesson 08

Measuring the stars

For the general reader. Fizeau had suggested in 1868 that interference could measure the sizes of stars. Michelson worked out the theory independently in 1890 and showed how to do it: watch the fringes from two separated mirrors and increase their separation until the fringes vanish. He measured the moons of Jupiter in 1891. In 1920, on the 100-inch telescope at Mount Wilson, he and Francis Pease measured the giant star Betelgeuse, the first star other than the Sun whose size was known.

Goals
  • Derive the visibility for a uniform disc and the vanishing baseline.
  • Understand why separate mirrors beat the bare aperture and the atmosphere.
  • Reproduce the Betelgeuse measurement.

The visibility of fringes from two apertures a distance \(B\) apart is the Fourier transform of the source brightness at spatial frequency \(B/\lambda\) (the van Cittert–Zernike theorem, stated in Lesson 10 of the Fizeau course). This is the angular analogue of Lesson 07, where the visibility was the Fourier transform of the spectrum.

Theorem (uniform disc)

For a uniformly bright disc of angular diameter \(\theta\), the visibility at baseline \(B\) is

\[ V(B)=\left|\frac{2J_1(\pi B\theta/\lambda)}{\pi B\theta/\lambda}\right|, \]

which first vanishes at \(B=1.22\,\lambda/\theta\).

Derivation. The disc has brightness \(1\) for \(|\boldsymbol\alpha|\le\theta/2\). Its two-dimensional Fourier transform at spatial frequency \(q=B/\lambda\) is \(\int_0^{\theta/2}\!\int_0^{2\pi}e^{-2\pi iq\rho\cos\phi}\rho\,d\phi\,d\rho=2\pi\int_0^{\theta/2}J_0(2\pi q\rho)\rho\,d\rho\). Using \(\int_0^a J_0(k\rho)\rho\,d\rho=aJ_1(ka)/k\) and normalizing by the area \(\pi\theta^2/4\) gives \(2J_1(x)/x\) with \(x=\pi q\theta\). The first zero of \(J_1\) is at \(x=3.832\), so \(B=3.832\lambda/(\pi\theta)=1.22\lambda/\theta\).

Jupiter’s satellites and Betelgeuse

In 1891, at Lick Observatory, Michelson placed a mask with two adjustable slits over the 12-inch refractor and measured the diameters of the four Galilean satellites, in good agreement with micrometer measurements. For stars a much longer baseline was needed. In 1920 a steel beam 20 feet (about 6 m) long was mounted across the top of the 100-inch Hooker telescope, carrying two movable outer mirrors that fed light to two inner mirrors and so into the telescope. The telescope only had to bring the two beams together; the baseline was set by the outer mirrors. Pease made most of the observations. On 13 December 1920 the fringes of Betelgeuse vanished at a separation of about 121 inches (3.07 m), giving an angular diameter of 0.047 arcseconds. With the distance then estimated, the star was about 240 million miles across, larger than the orbit of the Earth.

The method works through turbulence because the atmosphere shifts the fringes but, for small mirrors, hardly reduces their contrast. Larger beams proved mechanically unstable, and stellar interferometry stalled until the 1970s, when separate telescopes were combined with laser-controlled delay lines. Modern arrays such as the CHARA array on Mount Wilson and the VLT Interferometer are its direct descendants.

Exercise 8.1For Betelgeuse, take \(B=3.07\) m and an effective wavelength of 575 nm. Find the angular diameter of a uniform disc.

Show solution
\(\theta=1.22\lambda/B=1.22\times5.75\times10^{-7}/3.07\approx2.28\times10^{-7}\) rad \(=0.047''\). Limb darkening makes the true disc somewhat larger than the uniform-disc value.

Exercise 8.2Jupiter’s satellite Ganymede has a diameter of 5270 km. At opposition Jupiter is about \(6.3\times10^{8}\) km away. At what slit separation would its fringes vanish at 550 nm? Why was a 12-inch telescope enough?

Show solution
\(\theta=5270/6.3\times10^{8}=8.4\times10^{-6}\) rad \(\approx1.7''\). Then \(B=1.22\times5.5\times10^{-7}/8.4\times10^{-6}\approx0.080\) m. Eight centimetres fit easily inside a 30 cm aperture.
Lesson 09

The rotating and the yielding Earth

For the general reader. Two of Michelson’s late experiments used light to study the Earth itself. In the first, with Henry Gale, long pipes half filled with water served as giant levels, and interference measured how the Moon and Sun tilt the ground. The result showed that the Earth is as rigid as steel. In the second, light sent in both directions around a rectangle of evacuated pipe more than a kilometre and a half around showed the rotation of the Earth, without looking at the sky.

Goals
  • Derive the Sagnac phase shift for a rotating loop.
  • Reproduce the predicted shift of the Michelson–Gale–Pearson experiment.
  • Understand how the Earth-tide experiment measured rigidity.

The Sagnac effect

Proposition (Sagnac, 1913)

Two beams travel in opposite senses around a closed loop of area \(A\) that rotates at angular velocity \(\Omega\) about its normal. To first order in \(\Omega\), their arrival times differ by

\[ \Delta t=\frac{4A\Omega}{c^2}, \]

and with light of wavelength \(\lambda\) the fringes shift by \(\Delta N=4A\Omega/(\lambda c)\). For a horizontal loop at latitude \(\phi\) on the Earth, \(\Omega\) is replaced by \(\Omega_\oplus\sin\phi\).

Derivation for a circle. Let the loop be a circle of radius \(R\), rotating with rim speed \(v=\Omega R\), and work in the inertial frame. The co-rotating beam must cover \(2\pi R+v t_+\), so \(t_+=2\pi R/(c-v)\); the counter-rotating beam needs \(t_-=2\pi R/(c+v)\). Then \(\Delta t=\frac{4\pi Rv}{c^2-v^2}\approx\frac{4\pi R^2\Omega}{c^2}=\frac{4A\Omega}{c^2}\). The result holds for any shape by applying Stokes’s theorem to \(\oint\mathbf v\cdot d\mathbf l=2\Omega A\).

Michelson proposed the experiment in 1904. It was carried out in 1925 at Clearing, Illinois (latitude 41°46′), with Gale and Fred Pearson. A rectangle of 12-inch water pipe, about 613 m by 339 m, was evacuated, and a much smaller rectangle sharing one side served as a reference, since the large loop could not be rotated to set a zero. The predicted shift was 0.237 fringe; the observed shift was 0.230 ± 0.005. Ring-laser gyroscopes and fibre-optic gyroscopes in aircraft use the same effect.

Earth tides

From 1913 Michelson and Gale buried two long iron pipes, one running north–south and one east–west, each half filled with water. As the Moon and Sun pulled on the Earth, the water surface tilted relative to the pipe. Interferometers at the ends measured the water level to small fractions of a wavelength. The observed tides were somewhat smaller than those expected for a perfectly rigid Earth, and the ratio measured the Earth’s elastic yielding. The results, published in 1919, implied that the Earth as a whole is about as rigid as steel.

Exercise 9.1Compute the expected shift for the 1925 experiment: \(A=613\times339\ \text{m}^2\), latitude \(41.77^\circ\), \(\Omega_\oplus=7.292\times10^{-5}\) rad/s, \(\lambda=570\) nm.

Show solution
\(A\approx2.08\times10^{5}\ \text{m}^2\), \(\Omega_\oplus\sin\phi=4.86\times10^{-5}\) rad/s. \(\Delta N=4\times2.08\times10^{5}\times4.86\times10^{-5}/(5.7\times10^{-7}\times3.0\times10^{8})\approx0.236\), matching the published prediction.

Exercise 9.2A fibre-optic gyroscope has a coil of 1000 turns, each of radius 5 cm, and uses light of 1.55 µm. Find the phase shift \(2\pi\Delta N\) produced by the Earth’s rotation at the pole.

Show solution
Total area \(1000\times\pi\times0.05^2=7.85\ \text{m}^2\). \(\Delta N=4\times7.85\times7.29\times10^{-5}/(1.55\times10^{-6}\times3\times10^{8})\approx4.9\times10^{-6}\), so the phase is about \(3\times10^{-5}\) rad. Modern instruments resolve this.
Lesson 10

Mount Wilson and the last measurements of c

For the general reader. In his seventies Michelson returned to the speed of light. He sent a beam from Mount Wilson to Mount San Antonio, 35 km away, and back, using a spinning many-sided mirror. The distance was surveyed by the Coast and Geodetic Survey to a few parts in a million. His 1926 result was within a few kilometres per second of today’s value. His final experiment, in a mile-long evacuated pipe, was finished after his death.

Goals
  • Derive the null condition for a polygonal rotating mirror.
  • Understand the error budget of the 1926 measurement.
  • Place Michelson’s values in the history of \(c\).
Proposition (polygonal mirror null method)

A regular prism with \(m\) mirror faces turns at \(n\) revolutions per second. Light reflected by one face travels to a mirror at distance \(D\) and returns to be reflected by another face. If during the round trip the prism turns exactly through \(1/m\) of a revolution, the next face is in the position of the previous one and the returned image is undeflected. This happens when

\[ \frac{2D}{c}=\frac{1}{mn},\qquad c=2mnD. \]

Instead of measuring a small angle, Michelson adjusted the speed until the image was stationary, timing the rotation precisely, and measured only the small residual displacement. The precision then rested on the rotation rate and the distance. With \(m=8\) and \(D\approx35.4\) km the null speed is about 529 revolutions per second. He used prisms of glass and steel with 8, 12 and 16 faces, and the agreement among them tested systematic errors. The 1926 series gave

\[ c=299\,796\pm4\ \text{km/s}. \]

A practical difficulty was the refractive index of air over a 35 km mountain path, which had to be estimated from temperatures and pressures at the two ends. To remove it, in 1929 Michelson, Pease and Fred Pearson began measurements in an evacuated pipe about a mile long at the Irvine Ranch near Santa Ana, with the light folded by mirrors into a path of several miles. Michelson died with only part of the programme done. The published result, in 1935, was 299 774 ± 11 km/s, about 18 km/s too low, a reminder that the quoted error bars of that era were often too small.

Exercise 10.1With \(D=35\,385\) m and an octagonal mirror, find the rotation rate for a stationary image using \(c=299\,796\) km/s. What rate is needed with a 16-sided mirror?

Show solution
\(n=c/(2mD)=2.99796\times10^{8}/(16\times35\,385)\approx529.5\) rev/s. With \(m=16\), half that: about 264.8 rev/s.

Exercise 10.2Over a 35 km path in air with \(n-1\approx2.5\times10^{-4}\), what correction must be applied to obtain \(c\) in vacuum? How well must \(n-1\) be known to keep this error below 2 km/s?

Show solution
The group speed in air is lower by a fraction \(n_g-1\approx2.5\times10^{-4}\), so about 75 km/s must be added. An error of 2 km/s is a fraction \(6.7\times10^{-6}\), so \(n-1\) must be known to within about 3% of its value. That requires the mean temperature along the path to within a few kelvin.
Part III · Life and legacy
Lesson 11

Chicago and the Nobel Prize, 1890–1931

After two years at Clark University, Michelson accepted in 1892 the post of professor and first head of the department of physics at the new University of Chicago, founded with John D. Rockefeller’s money. The Ryerson Physical Laboratory was dedicated in 1894. He held the post until 1929; in 1925 he was named one of the university’s first Distinguished Service Professors. Robert Millikan, who joined the department in 1896, later wrote the National Academy’s memoir of him and described a man who preferred the laboratory to administration and set the highest standards of precision.

His first marriage ended in divorce in the late 1890s. In 1899 he married Edna Stanton, with whom he had three daughters. He played the violin, tennis and billiards, and he painted landscapes and seascapes in watercolour and oil with real skill. His popular lectures of 1899 became Light Waves and Their Uses (1903). In 1898, with Samuel Stratton, he built a harmonic analyzer that could add or decompose Fourier series of up to 80 terms; its plots of the partial sums of a square wave were part of the background to the discussion of what is now called the Gibbs phenomenon.

In 1907 he received the Nobel Prize in Physics for his optical precision instruments and the spectroscopic and metrological investigations carried out with them, the first Nobel Prize in a science awarded to an American. The same year the Royal Society gave him its Copley Medal. Other honours included the Matteucci Medal, the Elliott Cresson Medal (1912), the Henry Draper Medal (1916), the Gold Medal of the Royal Astronomical Society and the Franklin Medal (both 1923), and the Duddell Medal (1929). He was president of the American Physical Society (1900), of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (1910–11) and of the National Academy of Sciences (1923–27), and a Foreign Member of the Royal Society from 1902.

In the First World War he rejoined the Navy as a reserve officer and designed an optical rangefinder that the Navy adopted. In 1929 he moved to Pasadena to be near Mount Wilson. In 1928 he attended a conference there on the Michelson–Morley experiment, his last major public appearance. He was still at work on the vacuum-pipe measurement when he died in Pasadena on 9 May 1931, aged 78.

DiscussionMichelson never accepted the conclusion that most physicists drew from his most famous experiment. Does the interpretation of an experiment belong to its author? Compare his position with Lorentz’s and with Einstein’s.

Lesson 12

Legacy

Michelson’s career shows what precision can do. He rarely proposed new theories; he built instruments that measured an existing quantity a hundred times better, and the improvement repeatedly changed physics.

  • Relativity. The null result of 1887 led to the contraction hypothesis and became the most cited experimental support for special relativity. Its modern successors test Lorentz invariance at levels beyond \(10^{-17}\).
  • The speed of light. From 1879 to 1926 his values of \(c\) were the most accurate of their time. Since 1983 \(c\) has been fixed at 299 792 458 m/s and the metre is defined from it.
  • Metrology. His measurement of the metre in wavelengths of cadmium light led to the krypton definition of 1960. Laser interferometers measuring displacement by counting fringes are now standard in industry.
  • Spectroscopy. Visibility curves became Fourier-transform spectroscopy, used from infrared astronomy to chemical analysis.
  • Astronomy. The stellar interferometer led to the optical arrays that now image the surfaces of stars, and radio interferometry follows the same principle.
  • Gravitational waves. LIGO and Virgo are Michelson interferometers with arms of 4 km and 3 km. In 2015 LIGO detected a change in arm length a small fraction of a proton’s diameter.

A crater on the Moon, the Michelson Laboratory at the Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, and Michelson Hall at the Naval Academy bear his name.

Exercise 12.1A LIGO arm is 4 km long. A gravitational wave of strain amplitude \(h=10^{-21}\) changes the arm-length difference by about \(hL\). Compare this with the wavelength of LIGO’s 1064 nm laser and with the size of a proton (\(\sim1.7\times10^{-15}\) m).

Show solution
\(hL=10^{-21}\times4\times10^{3}=4\times10^{-18}\) m, about \(4\times10^{-12}\) of a wavelength and about \(1/400\) of a proton diameter. Optical cavities in the arms multiply the effective path many times, and high laser power reduces shot noise, which together make such phase shifts measurable.

Final projectChoose one of Michelson’s instruments from Part II. Write a two-page account for a strong undergraduate that describes the instrument, derives the effect it measures, compares Michelson’s numbers with the prediction, and identifies a modern instrument that uses the same principle.

Reference

Sources and further reading

Biography

  1. R. A. Millikan, Biographical memoir of Albert Abraham Michelson, National Academy of Sciences, 1938.
  2. Albert A. Michelson, biographical, NobelPrize.org.
  3. Albert A. Michelson, Wikipedia.
  4. D. M. Livingston, The Master of Light: A Biography of Albert A. Michelson, Scribner, 1973 (by his daughter).
  5. L. S. Swenson, The Ethereal Aether: A History of the Michelson–Morley–Miller Aether-Drift Experiments, 1880–1930, University of Texas Press, 1972.
  6. U.S. Naval Academy, Nimitz Library, Albert Michelson collection.

Physics

  1. A. A. Michelson, Experimental Determination of the Velocity of Light (1880), Project Gutenberg.
  2. A. A. Michelson, The relative motion of the Earth and the luminiferous ether, American Journal of Science 22 (1881).
  3. A. A. Michelson and E. W. Morley, On the relative motion of the Earth and the luminiferous ether, American Journal of Science 34 (1887).
  4. A. A. Michelson and E. W. Morley, Influence of motion of the medium on the velocity of light, American Journal of Science 31 (1886).
  5. A. A. Michelson and F. G. Pease, Measurement of the diameter of α Orionis with the interferometer, Astrophysical Journal 53 (1921).
  6. A. A. Michelson, H. G. Gale and F. Pearson, The effect of the Earth’s rotation on the velocity of light, Astrophysical Journal 61 (1925).
  7. A. A. Michelson, Measurement of the velocity of light between Mount Wilson and Mount San Antonio, Astrophysical Journal 65 (1927).
  8. A. A. Michelson, Light Waves and Their Uses, University of Chicago Press, 1903; Studies in Optics, 1927.
  9. Michelson–Morley experiment and Michelson–Gale–Pearson experiment, Wikipedia.
  10. D. Kleppner, Master Michelson’s measurement, Physics Today 60 (2007).
  11. M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics, Cambridge University Press (visibility, coherence, stellar interferometry).