The Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry
Sakharov conditions, sphaleron processes, and thermal leptogenesis as the origin of the baryon asymmetry of the universe
Overview
The observable universe is overwhelmingly composed of matter rather than antimatter, with a baryon-to-photon ratio $\eta_B = n_B/n_\gamma \approx 6.1\times10^{-10}$ measured independently by BBN and the CMB. Generating this asymmetry dynamically from symmetric initial conditions requires satisfying three necessary conditions identified by Sakharov (1967).
1. The Sakharov Conditions
Any dynamical mechanism for baryogenesis must satisfy three conditions simultaneously:
1. Baryon number violation: Processes that change $B$ must exist. In the SM, baryon number is an accidental symmetry at the perturbative level but is violated by non-perturbative electroweak processes (sphalerons).
2. C and CP violation: Both charge conjugation ($C$) and the combined $CP$ symmetry must be broken. Otherwise, every process producing a baryon excess has a conjugate process producing an equal antibaryon excess.
3. Departure from thermal equilibrium: In thermal equilibrium, CPT invariance ensures equal particle and antiparticle densities. An out-of-equilibrium epoch is essential.
2. Sphalerons and B+L Violation
The electroweak vacuum has a periodic structure labeled by the Chern-Simons number$N_{\rm CS}$. Transitions between adjacent vacua change both baryon and lepton number:
$$\Delta B = \Delta L = 3\,\Delta N_{\rm CS}\,,\qquad \Delta(B-L) = 0\,.$$
At zero temperature, these transitions proceed via quantum tunnelling with an exponentially suppressed rate:
$$\Gamma_{\rm tunnel} \propto e^{-4\pi/\alpha_W} \sim e^{-164} \approx 0\,.$$
At high temperatures $T \gtrsim 100$ GeV, the transitions proceed classically over the energy barrier (the sphaleron configuration) with a rate
$$\Gamma_{\rm sph} \sim \alpha_W^5\,T^4\,e^{-E_{\rm sph}/T}\,,\qquad E_{\rm sph} = \frac{8\pi v}{g} \approx 9\;\text{TeV}\,.$$
Above the electroweak phase transition ($T > T_{\rm EW} \approx 160$ GeV), the sphaleron rate is unsuppressed:
$$\Gamma_{\rm sph} \sim \alpha_W^5\,T^4 \gg H\,T^3\,,$$
so $B+L$ violating processes are in thermal equilibrium, while $B-L$is exactly conserved by sphalerons.
3. Thermal Leptogenesis
The seesaw mechanism introduces heavy right-handed Majorana neutrinos $N_i$ with masses $M_i \gg v_{\rm EW}$. The light neutrino mass matrix is
$$m_\nu = -m_D\,M_R^{-1}\,m_D^T\,,$$
where $m_D = Y_\nu v/\sqrt{2}$ is the Dirac mass matrix. The out-of-equilibrium decay of the lightest heavy neutrino $N_1$ can generate a lepton asymmetry through interference between tree-level and one-loop diagrams:
$$N_1 \to \ell_\alpha + H\,,\qquad N_1 \to \bar\ell_\alpha + H^\dagger\,.$$
The CP asymmetry in $N_1$ decays is
$$\epsilon_1 = \frac{\sum_\alpha[\Gamma(N_1\to\ell_\alpha H)-\Gamma(N_1\to\bar\ell_\alpha H^\dagger)]}{\sum_\alpha[\Gamma(N_1\to\ell_\alpha H)+\Gamma(N_1\to\bar\ell_\alpha H^\dagger)]}\,.$$
At one loop (vertex + self-energy corrections), this evaluates to
$$\epsilon_1 = -\frac{1}{8\pi}\frac{1}{(Y_\nu^\dagger Y_\nu)_{11}}\sum_{j\neq 1}\text{Im}\left[(Y_\nu^\dagger Y_\nu)_{1j}^2\right]\,g\!\left(\frac{M_j^2}{M_1^2}\right)\,,$$
where $g(x) = \sqrt{x}[1/(1-x)+1-(1+x)\ln((1+x)/x)]$. In the hierarchical limit$M_1 \ll M_2, M_3$, this simplifies to
$$\epsilon_1 \approx -\frac{3}{16\pi}\frac{M_1}{(Y_\nu^\dagger Y_\nu)_{11}}\sum_{j\neq 1}\text{Im}\left[(Y_\nu^\dagger Y_\nu)_{1j}^2\right]\frac{1}{M_j}\,.$$
4. From Lepton to Baryon Asymmetry
The lepton asymmetry $Y_{B-L}$ generated by $N_1$ decays is partially converted to a baryon asymmetry by sphalerons. In the SM with $n_g$ generations, the conversion factor is
$$Y_B = \frac{8n_g + 4}{22n_g + 13}\,Y_{B-L}\,.$$
For $n_g = 3$:
$$Y_B = \frac{28}{79}\,Y_{B-L} \simeq -\frac{28}{79}\,Y_{B-L}\,,$$
where the sign reflects the convention that a positive lepton asymmetry generates a positive baryon asymmetry. Including washout effects parametrized by an efficiency factor$\kappa_f < 1$:
$$Y_B \simeq -\frac{28}{79}\,\epsilon_1\,\kappa_f\,\frac{1}{g_*}\,.$$
5. The Davidson-Ibarra Bound
There is an upper bound on $|\epsilon_1|$ from unitarity and the seesaw relation, which in the hierarchical limit reads
$$|\epsilon_1| \leq \frac{3}{16\pi}\frac{M_1\,m_3}{v^2}\,,$$
where $m_3$ is the heaviest light neutrino mass and $v = 174$ GeV. Requiring successful leptogenesis ($Y_B \sim 10^{-10}$) then implies a lower bound on $M_1$:
$$M_{N_1} \gtrsim 10^9\;\text{GeV}\,,$$
assuming thermal initial abundance and a normal neutrino mass hierarchy with$m_3 \sim 0.05$ eV. This bound has profound implications: it requires a very high reheat temperature after inflation, $T_{\rm RH} \gtrsim 10^9$ GeV, which can conflict with gravitino overproduction in supersymmetric theories.
6. Washout and the Efficiency Factor
The lepton asymmetry generated by $N_1$ decays is partially erased by inverse decays and scattering processes. The washout parameter is defined as
$$K_1 \equiv \frac{\Gamma_{N_1}}{H(T=M_1)} = \frac{\tilde{m}_1}{m_*}\,,$$
where $\tilde{m}_1 = (Y_\nu^\dagger Y_\nu)_{11}v^2/M_1$ is the effective neutrino mass and $m_* \approx 1.1\times10^{-3}$ eV is the equilibrium neutrino mass. Three regimes emerge:
Weak washout ($K_1 \ll 1$): $N_1$decays out of equilibrium, $\kappa_f \approx 1$, but the asymmetry is sensitive to initial conditions (thermal vs. vanishing $N_1$ abundance).
Strong washout ($K_1 \gg 1$): Inverse decays erase most of the asymmetry; $\kappa_f \approx 0.3/(K_1(\ln K_1)^{0.6})$. The final asymmetry is independent of initial conditions, a desirable feature.
Intermediate ($K_1 \sim 1$): The efficiency factor peaks near $\kappa_f \sim 0.1\text{--}0.2$, providing optimal conditions for leptogenesis.
7. GUT Baryogenesis
In grand unified theories, heavy gauge or Higgs bosons ($X$, $Y$) with masses $M_X \sim 10^{16}$ GeV mediate baryon-number-violating interactions. Their out-of-equilibrium decays at $T \sim M_X$ can generate a baryon asymmetry:
$$Y_B \sim \epsilon_X\,\frac{n_X}{s}\bigg|_{T\sim M_X} \sim \frac{\epsilon_X}{g_*}\,,$$
where $\epsilon_X$ is the CP asymmetry in $X$ decays. A serious challenge for GUT baryogenesis is that sphalerons, active at $T \gg T_{\rm EW}$, can wash out any $B+L$ asymmetry. Only the $B-L$ component survives, so the GUT must generate a net $B-L$ asymmetry to be viable.
8. Affleck-Dine Mechanism
In supersymmetric theories, scalar fields carrying baryon number (flat directions of the scalar potential) can develop large field values during inflation. When the Hubble rate drops below their mass, they begin oscillating and decay. CP-violating A-terms in the potential rotate the field trajectory in the complex plane, generating a net baryon charge:
$$n_B \propto \text{Im}\left(A\,\phi^{*n}\right)\,|\phi|^2\,,$$
where $A$ is the soft SUSY-breaking A-term coefficient. This mechanism can produce the observed asymmetry for a wide range of parameters and is particularly efficient in scenarios with a low reheat temperature.
Key Results
$$\Delta B = \Delta L = 3\,\Delta N_{\rm CS}\,,\qquad Y_B = \frac{28}{79}\,Y_{B-L}$$
$$|\epsilon_1| \leq \frac{3M_1 m_3}{16\pi v^2}\,,\qquad M_{N_1} \gtrsim 10^9\;\text{GeV}$$