3. Quantum Entanglement

Quantum entanglement is a correlation between quantum systems that cannot be explained by classical physics. It is the key resource for quantum information processing and a fundamental feature distinguishing quantum from classical mechanics.

Definition of Entanglement

A pure state $|\psi\rangle_{AB}$ of a composite system AB is separable if:

$$|\psi\rangle_{AB} = |\phi\rangle_A \otimes |\chi\rangle_B$$

Otherwise, it is entangled.

For mixed states, $\hat{\rho}_{AB}$ is separable if:

$$\hat{\rho}_{AB} = \sum_i p_i \hat{\rho}_A^{(i)} \otimes \hat{\rho}_B^{(i)}$$

A convex combination of product states

Key insight: Entangled states exhibit correlations that cannot be explained by any local hidden variable theory

Bell States

The four maximally entangled states of two qubits:

\begin{align*} |\Phi^+\rangle &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|00\rangle + |11\rangle) \\ |\Phi^-\rangle &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|00\rangle - |11\rangle) \\ |\Psi^+\rangle &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|01\rangle + |10\rangle) \\ |\Psi^-\rangle &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|01\rangle - |10\rangle) \end{align*}

Properties:

  • Form an orthonormal basis (Bell basis)
  • Maximally entangled: reduced density matrices are maximally mixed
  • Cannot be written as product states
  • Measurement of one qubit instantly determines the other's state

EPR Paradox

Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen (1935) argued that quantum mechanics is incomplete:

Consider two particles in state $|\Psi^-\rangle$ (singlet state):

$$|\Psi^-\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|\uparrow\rangle_A|\downarrow\rangle_B - |\downarrow\rangle_A|\uparrow\rangle_B)$$

EPR argument:

  1. Measuring spin of particle A along any axis gives random result
  2. This measurement instantly determines spin of B along same axis
  3. Since particles are separated, measurement on A cannot affect B (locality)
  4. Therefore, B must have had definite spin all along (reality)
  5. But quantum mechanics doesn't describe these "elements of reality" → incomplete!

Resolution: Bell's theorem shows locality + realism incompatible with quantum predictions. Experiments confirm quantum mechanics; nature is non-local!

Schmidt Decomposition

Any pure state $|\psi\rangle_{AB}$ can be written as:

$$|\psi\rangle_{AB} = \sum_i \sqrt{\lambda_i} |i\rangle_A \otimes |i\rangle_B$$

Where $\{|i\rangle_A\}$ and $\{|i\rangle_B\}$ are orthonormal bases, and $\lambda_i \geq 0$, $\sum_i \lambda_i = 1$

Properties:

  • Schmidt rank: Number of nonzero $\lambda_i$
  • Separable iff Schmidt rank = 1
  • Maximally entangled iff all $\lambda_i$ equal

The $\lambda_i$ are eigenvalues of both $\hat{\rho}_A$ and $\hat{\rho}_B$:

$$\hat{\rho}_A = \sum_i \lambda_i |i\rangle_A\langle i|, \quad \hat{\rho}_B = \sum_i \lambda_i |i\rangle_B\langle i|$$

Entanglement Entropy

The von Neumann entropy of the reduced density matrix quantifies entanglement:

$$S_A = -\text{Tr}(\hat{\rho}_A \ln \hat{\rho}_A) = -\sum_i \lambda_i \ln \lambda_i$$

Properties for pure bipartite state $|\psi\rangle_{AB}$:

  • $S_A = S_B$ (symmetry)
  • $S_A = 0$ iff state is separable (no entanglement)
  • $S_A = \ln d$ for maximally entangled state in $d \times d$ system

Example: Bell state $|\Phi^+\rangle$

$$\hat{\rho}_A = \frac{\mathbb{I}}{2} \quad \Rightarrow \quad S_A = \ln 2$$

Maximal entanglement for two qubits

Entanglement Measures

Several measures quantify entanglement beyond entropy:

1. Concurrence (for two qubits):

$$C(\hat{\rho}) = \max\{0, \sqrt{\lambda_1} - \sqrt{\lambda_2} - \sqrt{\lambda_3} - \sqrt{\lambda_4}\}$$

Where $\lambda_i$ are eigenvalues of $\hat{\rho}(\sigma_y \otimes \sigma_y)\hat{\rho}^*(\sigma_y \otimes \sigma_y)$

Range: $C \in [0, 1]$, with 0 = separable, 1 = maximally entangled

2. Entanglement of Formation:

$$E_F(\hat{\rho}) = \min_{\{p_i, |\psi_i\rangle\}} \sum_i p_i S(\hat{\rho}_A^{(i)})$$

Minimum average entanglement needed to prepare $\hat{\rho}$

3. Negativity:

$$\mathcal{N}(\hat{\rho}) = \frac{||\hat{\rho}^{T_A}||_1 - 1}{2}$$

Based on partial transpose; easy to compute but not always monotone

Monogamy of Entanglement

Unlike classical correlations, entanglement cannot be freely shared:

$$S_A^2 \geq S_{AB}^2 + S_{AC}^2$$

If A is maximally entangled with B, it cannot be entangled with C

Example: Three qubits cannot all be pairwise maximally entangled

Implications:

  • Fundamental constraint on quantum networks
  • Security of quantum key distribution
  • Structure of quantum error-correcting codes

Multipartite Entanglement

Three-qubit entangled states come in inequivalent classes:

1. GHZ state:

$$|\text{GHZ}\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|000\rangle + |111\rangle)$$

Maximum violation of local realism; but tracing out one qubit gives separable state

2. W state:

$$|W\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}(|100\rangle + |010\rangle + |001\rangle)$$

Robust: any two qubits remain entangled after tracing out third

These states are inequivalent under local operations and classical communication (LOCC)

Entanglement and Quantum Operations

LOCC (Local Operations and Classical Communication):

Operations that cannot increase entanglement:

  • Local unitary operations
  • Local measurements
  • Classical communication of measurement results

Entanglement distillation:

Convert many copies of weakly entangled pairs into fewer maximally entangled pairs using LOCC

$$n \text{ copies of } \hat{\rho} \xrightarrow{\text{LOCC}} m \text{ Bell pairs}, \quad m/n \to S(\hat{\rho}_A)$$

Entanglement dilution:

Reverse process: create many weakly entangled pairs from few maximally entangled pairs

Quantum Teleportation

Transfer an unknown quantum state using entanglement and classical communication:

Protocol:

  1. Alice and Bob share Bell pair $|\Phi^+\rangle_{AB}$
  2. Alice has unknown state $|\psi\rangle_C = \alpha|0\rangle + \beta|1\rangle$ to send to Bob
  3. Alice performs Bell measurement on C and her half of pair, gets 2 classical bits
  4. Alice sends 2 bits to Bob classically
  5. Bob applies appropriate unitary based on bits received
  6. Bob's qubit is now in state $|\psi\rangle$

Key features:

  • Original state $|\psi\rangle_C$ is destroyed (no cloning theorem)
  • No faster-than-light communication (classical channel required)
  • Consumes one Bell pair (entanglement as resource)

Applications of Entanglement

  • Quantum cryptography: BB84 protocol, quantum key distribution
  • Quantum computing: Entanglement enables quantum algorithms (Shor, Grover)
  • Quantum metrology: Entangled states beat classical precision limits
  • Quantum networks: Quantum internet based on distributed entanglement
  • Fundamental tests: Bell inequality violations, loophole-free tests
  • Condensed matter: Entanglement in ground states, topological order
  • Black hole physics: ER=EPR conjecture linking entanglement to geometry

Einstein's "Spooky Action": Einstein called entanglement "spukhafte Fernwirkung" (spooky action at a distance) and believed it showed quantum mechanics was incomplete. Decades later, experiments confirmed that nature really is this "spooky" - entanglement is real, and local realism must be abandoned. This is now the foundation of quantum information technology.